camper/pkg/booking/admin.go

625 lines
18 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

/*
* SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2023 jordi fita mas <jfita@peritasoft.com>
* SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-only
*/
package booking
import (
"context"
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/ods"
"errors"
"net/http"
"strconv"
"strings"
"time"
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
"golang.org/x/text/language"
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/auth"
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/database"
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/form"
httplib "dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/http"
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/locale"
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/template"
"dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/uuid"
)
type AdminHandler struct {
}
func NewAdminHandler() *AdminHandler {
return &AdminHandler{}
}
func (h *AdminHandler) Handler(user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn) http.Handler {
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
var head string
head, r.URL.Path = httplib.ShiftPath(r.URL.Path)
switch head {
case "":
switch r.Method {
case http.MethodGet:
serveBookingIndex(w, r, user, company, conn)
case http.MethodPost:
addBooking(w, r, user, company, conn)
default:
httplib.MethodNotAllowed(w, r, http.MethodGet, http.MethodPost)
}
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
case "new":
switch r.Method {
case http.MethodGet:
serveAdminBookingForm(w, r, user, company, conn, 0, "/admin/bookings/new")
default:
httplib.MethodNotAllowed(w, r, http.MethodGet)
}
default:
if !uuid.Valid(head) {
http.NotFound(w, r)
return
}
h.bookingHandler(user, company, conn, head).ServeHTTP(w, r)
}
})
}
func serveAdminBookingForm(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn, id int, url string) {
f, err := newAdminBookingForm(r, conn, company, user.Locale)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
f.ID = id
f.URL = url
f.MustRender(w, r, user, company)
}
func (h *AdminHandler) bookingHandler(user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn, slug string) http.Handler {
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
var head string
head, r.URL.Path = httplib.ShiftPath(r.URL.Path)
switch head {
case "":
switch r.Method {
case http.MethodGet:
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if len(r.Form) > 0 {
// Act as if it was a new form, because everything needed to render form fields is
// already passed as in request query.
id, err := conn.GetInt(r.Context(), "select booking_id from booking where slug = $1", slug)
if err != nil {
if database.ErrorIsNotFound(err) {
http.NotFound(w, r)
return
}
panic(err)
}
serveAdminBookingForm(w, r, user, company, conn, id, "/admin/bookings/"+slug)
return
}
f := newEmptyAdminBookingForm(r.Context(), conn, company, user.Locale)
if err := f.FillFromDatabase(r.Context(), conn, company, slug, user.Locale); err != nil {
if database.ErrorIsNotFound(err) {
http.NotFound(w, r)
return
}
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
panic(err)
}
f.MustRender(w, r, user, company)
case http.MethodPut:
updateBooking(w, r, user, company, conn, slug)
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
default:
httplib.MethodNotAllowed(w, r, http.MethodGet, http.MethodPut)
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
}
case "check-in":
switch r.Method {
case http.MethodGet:
serveCheckInForm(w, r, user, company, conn, slug)
case http.MethodPost:
checkInBooking(w, r, user, company, conn, slug)
default:
httplib.MethodNotAllowed(w, r, http.MethodGet, http.MethodPost)
}
case "guest":
switch r.Method {
case http.MethodGet:
serveGuestForm(w, r, user, company, conn, slug)
default:
httplib.MethodNotAllowed(w, r, http.MethodGet)
}
default:
http.NotFound(w, r)
}
})
}
func serveBookingIndex(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn) {
bookings, err := collectBookingEntries(r.Context(), conn, user.Locale.Language)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
page := bookingIndex(bookings)
page.MustRender(w, r, user, company)
}
func collectBookingEntries(ctx context.Context, conn *database.Conn, lang language.Tag) ([]*bookingEntry, error) {
rows, err := conn.Query(ctx, `
select left(slug::text, 10)
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
, '/admin/bookings/' || slug
, lower(stay)
, upper(stay)
, holder_name
, booking.booking_status
, coalesce(i18n.name, status.name)
from booking
join booking_status as status using (booking_status)
left join booking_status_i18n as i18n on status.booking_status = i18n.booking_status and i18n.lang_tag = $1
order by stay desc
`, lang)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
defer rows.Close()
var entries []*bookingEntry
for rows.Next() {
entry := &bookingEntry{}
if err = rows.Scan(&entry.Reference, &entry.URL, &entry.ArrivalDate, &entry.DepartureDate, &entry.HolderName, &entry.Status, &entry.StatusLabel); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
entries = append(entries, entry)
}
return entries, nil
}
type bookingEntry struct {
Reference string
URL string
ArrivalDate time.Time
DepartureDate time.Time
HolderName string
Status string
StatusLabel string
}
type bookingIndex []*bookingEntry
func (page bookingIndex) MustRender(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company) {
switch r.URL.Query().Get("format") {
case "ods":
columns := []string{
"Reference",
"Arrival Date",
"Departure Date",
"Holder Name",
"Status",
}
table, err := ods.WriteTable(page, columns, user.Locale, func(sb *strings.Builder, entry *bookingEntry) error {
if err := ods.WriteCellString(sb, entry.Reference); err != nil {
return err
}
ods.WriteCellDate(sb, entry.ArrivalDate)
ods.WriteCellDate(sb, entry.DepartureDate)
if err := ods.WriteCellString(sb, entry.HolderName); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := ods.WriteCellString(sb, entry.StatusLabel); err != nil {
return err
}
return nil
})
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
ods.MustWriteResponse(w, table, user.Locale.Pgettext("bookings.ods", "filename"))
default:
template.MustRenderAdmin(w, r, user, company, "booking/index.gohtml", page)
}
}
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
type adminBookingForm struct {
*bookingForm
ID int
URL string
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
Campsites []*CampsiteEntry
selected []int
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
Months []*Month
Error error
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
}
func newEmptyAdminBookingForm(ctx context.Context, conn *database.Conn, company *auth.Company, l *locale.Locale) *adminBookingForm {
return &adminBookingForm{
bookingForm: newEmptyBookingForm(ctx, conn, company, l),
}
}
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
func newAdminBookingForm(r *http.Request, conn *database.Conn, company *auth.Company, l *locale.Locale) (*adminBookingForm, error) {
inner, err := newBookingForm(r, company, conn, l)
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if inner.Options != nil {
for _, option := range inner.Options.Options {
option.Subtotal = findSubtotal(option.ID, inner.Cart)
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
}
}
f := &adminBookingForm{
bookingForm: inner,
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
}
// Dates and Campsite are valid
if inner.Guests != nil {
selected := r.Form["campsite"]
if err = f.FetchCampsites(r.Context(), conn, company, selected); err != nil {
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
return nil, err
}
}
return f, nil
}
func (f *adminBookingForm) FetchCampsites(ctx context.Context, conn *database.Conn, company *auth.Company, selected []string) error {
arrivalDate, _ := time.Parse(database.ISODateFormat, f.Dates.ArrivalDate.Val)
from := arrivalDate.AddDate(0, 0, -1)
departureDate, _ := time.Parse(database.ISODateFormat, f.Dates.DepartureDate.Val)
to := departureDate.AddDate(0, 0, 2)
f.Months = CollectMonths(from, to)
var err error
f.Campsites, err = CollectCampsiteEntries(ctx, company, conn, from, to, f.CampsiteType.String())
if err != nil {
return err
}
for _, s := range selected {
ID, _ := strconv.Atoi(s)
for _, c := range f.Campsites {
if c.ID == ID {
f.selected = append(f.selected, c.ID)
c.Selected = true
break
}
}
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
}
return nil
“Mockup” for the new booking form It does nothing but compute the total of a booking, much like it does for guests. In fact, i use the same payment relations to do the exact same computation, otherwise i am afraid i will make a mistake in the ACSI or such, now or in future version; better if both are exactly the same. The idea is that once the user creates the booking, i will delete that payment, because it makes no sense to keep it in this case; nobody is going to pay for it. Had to reuse the grid showing the bookings of campsites because employees need to select one or more campsites to book, and need to see which are available. In this case, i have to filter by campsite type and use the arrival and departure dates to filter the months, now up to the day, not just month. Had to change max width of th and td in the grid to take into account that now a month could have a single day, for instance, and the month heading can not stretch the day or booking spans would not be in their correct positions. For that, i needed to access campsiteEntry, bookingEntry, and Month from campsite package, but campsite imports campsite/types, and campsite/types already imports booking for the BookingDates type. To break the cycle, had to move all that to booking and use from campsite; it is mostly unchanged, except for the granularity of dates up to days instead of just months. The design of this form calls for a different way of showing the totals, because here employees have to see the amount next to the input with the units, instead of having a footer with the table. I did not like the idea of having to query the database for that, therefore i “lifter” the payment draft into a struct that both public and admin forms use to show they respective views of the cart.
2024-04-23 19:07:41 +00:00
}
func findSubtotal(ID int, cart *bookingCart) string {
none := "0.0"
if cart == nil || cart.Draft == nil {
return none
}
for _, option := range cart.Draft.Options {
if option.ID == ID {
return option.Subtotal
}
}
return none
}
func (f *adminBookingForm) MustRender(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company) {
if httplib.IsHTMxRequest(r) {
template.MustRenderAdminNoLayoutFiles(w, r, user, company, f, "booking/fields.gohtml", "booking/grid.gohtml")
} else {
template.MustRenderAdminFiles(w, r, user, company, f, "booking/form.gohtml", "booking/fields.gohtml", "booking/grid.gohtml")
}
}
func addBooking(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn) {
processAdminBookingForm(w, r, user, company, conn, 0, func(ctx context.Context, tx *database.Tx, f *adminBookingForm) error {
var err error
f.ID, err = tx.AddBookingFromPayment(ctx, f.PaymentSlug.Val)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return tx.EditBooking(
ctx,
f.ID,
f.Customer.FullName.Val,
f.Customer.Address.Val,
f.Customer.PostalCode.Val,
f.Customer.City.Val,
f.Customer.Country.String(),
f.Customer.Email.Val,
f.Customer.Phone.Val,
language.Make("und"),
"confirmed",
f.selected,
)
})
}
func updateBooking(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn, slug string) {
var bookingID int
var bookingStatus string
var langTag string
row := conn.QueryRow(r.Context(), "select booking_id, booking_status, lang_tag from booking where slug = $1", slug)
if err := row.Scan(&bookingID, &bookingStatus, &langTag); err != nil {
if database.ErrorIsNotFound(err) {
http.NotFound(w, r)
return
}
panic(err)
}
processAdminBookingForm(w, r, user, company, conn, bookingID, func(ctx context.Context, tx *database.Tx, f *adminBookingForm) error {
var err error
_, err = tx.EditBookingFromPayment(ctx, slug, f.PaymentSlug.Val)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if bookingStatus == "created" {
bookingStatus = "confirmed"
}
return tx.EditBooking(
ctx,
f.ID,
f.Customer.FullName.Val,
f.Customer.Address.Val,
f.Customer.PostalCode.Val,
f.Customer.City.Val,
f.Customer.Country.String(),
f.Customer.Email.Val,
f.Customer.Phone.Val,
language.Make(langTag),
bookingStatus,
f.selected,
)
})
}
func processAdminBookingForm(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, user *auth.User, company *auth.Company, conn *database.Conn, bookingID int, act func(ctx context.Context, tx *database.Tx, f *adminBookingForm) error) {
f, err := newAdminBookingForm(r, conn, company, user.Locale)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err := user.VerifyCSRFToken(r); err != nil {
http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
f.ID = bookingID
if ok, err := f.Valid(r.Context(), conn, user.Locale); err != nil {
panic(err)
} else if !ok {
if !httplib.IsHTMxRequest(r) {
w.WriteHeader(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
}
f.MustRender(w, r, user, company)
return
}
tx := conn.MustBegin(r.Context())
defer tx.Rollback(r.Context())
if err := act(r.Context(), tx, f); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
tx.MustCommit(r.Context())
httplib.Redirect(w, r, "/admin/bookings", http.StatusSeeOther)
}
func (f *adminBookingForm) Valid(ctx context.Context, conn *database.Conn, l *locale.Locale) (bool, error) {
v := form.NewValidator(l)
if f.Dates == nil {
return false, errors.New("no booking date fields")
}
if f.Guests == nil {
return false, errors.New("no guests fields")
}
if f.Customer == nil {
return false, errors.New("no customer fields")
}
if f.Cart == nil {
return false, errors.New("no booking cart")
}
v.CheckSelectedOptions(f.CampsiteType, l.GettextNoop("Selected campsite type is not valid."))
f.Dates.Valid(v, l)
f.Guests.Valid(v, l)
if f.Options != nil {
f.Options.Valid(v, l)
}
var country string
if f.Customer.Country.ValidOptionsSelected() {
country = f.Customer.Country.Selected[0]
}
if v.CheckRequired(f.Customer.FullName, l.GettextNoop("Full name can not be empty.")) {
v.CheckMinLength(f.Customer.FullName, 1, l.GettextNoop("Full name must have at least one letter."))
}
if f.Customer.PostalCode.Val != "" {
if country == "" {
v.Check(f.Customer.PostalCode, false, l.GettextNoop("Country can not be empty to validate the postcode."))
} else if _, err := v.CheckValidPostalCode(ctx, conn, f.Customer.PostalCode, country, l.GettextNoop("This postcode is not valid.")); err != nil {
return false, err
}
}
if f.Customer.Email.Val != "" {
v.CheckValidEmail(f.Customer.Email, l.GettextNoop("This email is not valid. It should be like name@domain.com."))
}
if f.Customer.Phone.Val != "" {
if country == "" {
v.Check(f.Customer.Phone, false, l.GettextNoop("Country can not be empty to validate the phone."))
} else if _, err := v.CheckValidPhone(ctx, conn, f.Customer.Phone, country, l.GettextNoop("This phone number is not valid.")); err != nil {
return false, err
}
}
if len(f.selected) == 0 {
f.Error = errors.New(l.Gettext("You must select at least one accommodation."))
v.AllOK = false
} else if f.Dates.ArrivalDate.Error == nil && f.Dates.DepartureDate.Error == nil {
if available, err := datesAvailable(ctx, conn, f.ID, f.Dates, f.selected); err != nil {
return false, err
} else if !available {
f.Error = errors.New(l.Gettext("The selected accommodations have no available openings in the requested dates."))
v.AllOK = false
}
}
return v.AllOK, nil
}
func datesAvailable(ctx context.Context, conn *database.Conn, bookingID int, dates *DateFields, selectedCampsites []int) (bool, error) {
return conn.GetBool(ctx, `
select not exists (
select 1
from camper.booking_campsite
where booking_id <> $1
and campsite_id = any ($4)
and stay && daterange($2::date, $3::date)
)
`,
bookingID,
dates.ArrivalDate,
dates.DepartureDate,
selectedCampsites,
)
}
func (f *adminBookingForm) FillFromDatabase(ctx context.Context, conn *database.Conn, company *auth.Company, slug string, l *locale.Locale) error {
f.Cart = &bookingCart{Draft: &paymentDraft{}}
f.Customer = newBookingCustomerFields(ctx, conn, l)
var arrivalDate string
var departureDate string
var acsiCard bool
var zonePreferences string
var selected []string
row := conn.QueryRow(ctx, `
select booking_id
, '/admin/bookings/' || booking.slug
, array[campsite_type.slug::text]
, lower(booking.stay)::text
, upper(booking.stay)::text
, upper(booking.stay) - lower(booking.stay)
, to_price(subtotal_nights, decimal_digits)
, number_adults
, to_price(subtotal_adults, decimal_digits)
, number_teenagers
, to_price(subtotal_teenagers, decimal_digits)
, number_children
, to_price(subtotal_children, decimal_digits)
, number_dogs
, to_price(subtotal_dogs, decimal_digits)
, to_price(subtotal_tourist_tax, decimal_digits)
, to_price(total, decimal_digits)
, acsi_card
, holder_name
, coalesce(address, '')
, coalesce(postal_code, '')
, coalesce(city, '')
, array[coalesce(country_code::text, '')]
, coalesce(email::text, '')
, coalesce(phone::text, '')
, zone_preferences
, array_agg(coalesce(campsite_id::text, ''))
from booking
join campsite_type using (campsite_type_id)
left join campsite_type_pet_cost as pet using (campsite_type_id)
left join booking_campsite using (booking_id)
join currency using (currency_code)
where booking.slug = $1
group by booking_id
, campsite_type.slug
, booking.stay
, subtotal_nights
, number_adults
, subtotal_adults
, number_teenagers
, subtotal_teenagers
, number_children
, subtotal_children
, number_dogs
, subtotal_dogs
, subtotal_tourist_tax
, total
, acsi_card
, holder_name
, address
, postal_code
, city
, country_code
, email
, phone
, zone_preferences
, decimal_digits
`, slug)
if err := row.Scan(
&f.ID,
&f.URL,
&f.CampsiteType.Selected,
&arrivalDate,
&departureDate,
&f.Cart.Draft.NumNights,
&f.Cart.Draft.Nights,
&f.Cart.Draft.NumAdults,
&f.Cart.Draft.Adults,
&f.Cart.Draft.NumTeenagers,
&f.Cart.Draft.Teenagers,
&f.Cart.Draft.NumChildren,
&f.Cart.Draft.Children,
&f.Cart.Draft.NumDogs,
&f.Cart.Draft.Dogs,
&f.Cart.Draft.TouristTax,
&f.Cart.Draft.Total,
&acsiCard,
&f.Customer.FullName.Val,
&f.Customer.Address.Val,
&f.Customer.PostalCode.Val,
&f.Customer.City.Val,
&f.Customer.Country.Selected,
&f.Customer.Email.Val,
&f.Customer.Phone.Val,
&zonePreferences,
&selected,
); err != nil {
return err
}
var err error
f.Dates, err = NewDateFields(ctx, conn, f.CampsiteType.String())
if err != nil {
return err
}
f.Dates.ArrivalDate.Val = arrivalDate
f.Dates.DepartureDate.Val = departureDate
f.Dates.AdjustValues(l)
f.Guests, err = newBookingGuestFields(ctx, conn, f.CampsiteType.String(), arrivalDate, departureDate)
if err != nil {
return err
}
f.Guests.NumberAdults.Val = strconv.Itoa(f.Cart.Draft.NumAdults)
f.Guests.NumberTeenagers.Val = strconv.Itoa(f.Cart.Draft.NumTeenagers)
f.Guests.NumberChildren.Val = strconv.Itoa(f.Cart.Draft.NumChildren)
if f.Guests.NumberDogs != nil {
f.Guests.NumberDogs.Val = strconv.Itoa(f.Cart.Draft.NumDogs)
}
if f.Guests.ACSICard != nil {
f.Guests.ACSICard.Checked = acsiCard
}
f.Guests.AdjustValues(f.Cart.Draft.NumAdults+f.Cart.Draft.NumTeenagers+f.Cart.Draft.NumChildren, l)
f.Options, err = newBookingOptionFields(ctx, conn, f.CampsiteType.String(), l)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if f.Options != nil {
if f.Options.ZonePreferences != nil {
f.Options.ZonePreferences.Val = zonePreferences
}
if err = f.Options.FillFromDatabase(ctx, conn, f.ID); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err = f.FetchCampsites(ctx, conn, company, selected); err != nil {
return err
}
return nil
}