tandem/camper
tandem
/
camper
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 7 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
camper/web/templates/admin/form.gohtml

53 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add profile form, inside a user menu This is the first form that uses HTMx, and can not return a 400 error code because otherwise HTMx does not render the content. Since now there are pages that do not render the whole html, with header and body, i need a different layout for these, and moved the common code to handle forms and such a new template file that both layouts can use. I also need the request in template.MustRender to check which layout i should use. Closes #7.
2023-07-26 18:46:09 +00:00
<!--
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2023 jordi fita mas <jordi@tandem.blog>
SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-only
-->
{{ define "error-attrs" }}{{ if .Error }}aria-invalid="true" aria-errormessage="{{ .Name }}-error"{{ end }}{{ end }}
{{ define "error-message" -}}
{{ if .Error -}}
<span id="{{ .Name }}-error" class="error">{{ .Error }}</span><br>
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{ define "list-options" -}}
{{- range .Options }}
<option value="{{ .Value }}" {{ if $.IsSelected .Value }} selected="selected"{{ end }}>{{ .Label }}</option>
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
Manage all media uploads in a single place It made no sense to have a file upload in each form that needs a media, because to reuse an existing media users would need to upload the exact same file again; this is very unusual and unfriendly. A better option is to have a “centralized” media section, where people can upload files there, and then have a picker to select from there. Ideally, there would be an upload option in the picker, but i did not add it yet. I’ve split the content from the media because i want users to have the option to update a media, for instance when they need to upload a reduced or cropped version of the same photo, without an edit they would need to upload the file as a new media and then update all places where the old version was used. And i did not want to trouble people that uploads the same photo twice: without the separate relation, doing so would throw a constraint error. I do not believe there is any security problem to have all companies link their media to the same file, as they were already readable by everyone and could upload the data from a different company to their own; in other words, it is not worse than it was now.
2023-09-20 23:56:44 +00:00
Add the payment form to admin Had to change setup_redsys because admins can not read the current encrypt key, thus it is not possible to `set encrypt_key = coalesce(…, encrypt_key)`. Not that it did much sense, anyway, as i was already inside the branch of the if when encrpty_key is null. However, it seems that this also affects in the `on conflict` update. I assume this is because `excluded` is some kind of row of the relation and has the same restrictions.
2023-10-27 14:04:43 +00:00
{{ define "radio-options" -}}
{{- range .Options }}
<label><input type="radio" name="{{ $.Name }}" value="{{ .Value }}"
{{ if $.IsSelected .Value }}checked{{ end }}> {{ .Label }}</label>
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
Manage all media uploads in a single place It made no sense to have a file upload in each form that needs a media, because to reuse an existing media users would need to upload the exact same file again; this is very unusual and unfriendly. A better option is to have a “centralized” media section, where people can upload files there, and then have a picker to select from there. Ideally, there would be an upload option in the picker, but i did not add it yet. I’ve split the content from the media because i want users to have the option to update a media, for instance when they need to upload a reduced or cropped version of the same photo, without an edit they would need to upload the file as a new media and then update all places where the old version was used. And i did not want to trouble people that uploads the same photo twice: without the separate relation, doing so would throw a constraint error. I do not believe there is any security problem to have all companies link their media to the same file, as they were already readable by everyone and could upload the data from a different company to their own; in other words, it is not worse than it was now.
2023-09-20 23:56:44 +00:00
{{ define "media-picker" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/camper/pkg/form.Media*/ -}}
Add the upload form to the media picker It makes easier to upload new images from the place where we need it, instead of having to go to the media section each time. It was a little messy, this one. First of all, I realized that POSTint to /admin/media/picker to get the new media field was wrong: i was not asking the server to “accept an entity”, but only requesting a new HTML value, just like a GET to /admin/media/upload requests the form to upload a new media, thus here i should do the same, except i needed the query parameters to change the field, which is fine—it is actually a different resource, thus a different URL. Then, i thought that i could not POST the upload to /admin/media, because i returned a different HTML —the media field—, so i reused the recently unused POST to /admin/media/picker to upload that file and return the HTML for the field. It was wrong, because i was not requesting the server to put the file as a subordinate of /admin/media/picker, only /admin/media, but i did not come up with any other solution. Since i had two different upload functions now, i created uploadForm’s Handle method to refactorize the duplicated logic to a single place. Unfortunately, i did not work as i expected because uploadForm’s and mediaPicker’s MustRender methods are different, and mediaPicker has to embed uploadForm to render the form in the picker. That made me change Handle’s output to a boolean and error in order for the HTTP handler function know when to render the form with the error messages with the proper MustRender handler. However, I saw the opportunity of reusing that Handler method for editMedia, that was doing mostly the same job, but had to call a different Validate than uploadForm’s, because editMedia does not require the uploaded file. That’s when i realized that i could use an interface and that this interface could be reused not only within media but throughout the application, and added HandleMultipart in form. Had to create a different interface for multipart forms because they need different parameters in Parse that non-multipart form, when i add that interface, hence had to also change Parse to ParseForm to account for the difference in signature; not a big deal. After all that, i realized that i **could** POST to /admin/media in both cases, because i always return “an HTML entity”, it just happens that for the media section it is empty with a redirect, and for the picker is the field. That made the whole Handle method a bit redundant, but i left it nevertheless, as i find it slightly easier to read the uploadMedia function now.
2023-09-21 23:40:22 +00:00
<fieldset data-hx-target="this" data-hx-swap="outerHTML">
Manage all media uploads in a single place It made no sense to have a file upload in each form that needs a media, because to reuse an existing media users would need to upload the exact same file again; this is very unusual and unfriendly. A better option is to have a “centralized” media section, where people can upload files there, and then have a picker to select from there. Ideally, there would be an upload option in the picker, but i did not add it yet. I’ve split the content from the media because i want users to have the option to update a media, for instance when they need to upload a reduced or cropped version of the same photo, without an edit they would need to upload the file as a new media and then update all places where the old version was used. And i did not want to trouble people that uploads the same photo twice: without the separate relation, doing so would throw a constraint error. I do not believe there is any security problem to have all companies link their media to the same file, as they were already readable by everyone and could upload the data from a different company to their own; in other words, it is not worse than it was now.
2023-09-20 23:56:44 +00:00
<legend>{{( pgettext .Label "input" )}}</legend>
<input type="hidden" name="{{ .Name }}" value="{{ .Val }}">
Change media picker from <div> to <dialog> and make it modal Have to call Dialog.showModal when HTMx loaded the dialog in the DOM, so had to add a onLoad event listened that checks whether the loaded element is actually a DIALOG. Had to restrict the margin: 0 for all elements (*) to exclude dialog, because the browser sets it to auto, and i did not want to set it again just because i was too overzealous with my “reset”. The rest of the CSS is just to have a sticky header and footer, and see the cancel button, that works as a “close”, all the time. Finally, i realized that if i add the dialog at the end of the fieldset and let HTMx inherit its hx-target and hx-swap, i no longer need to set them in the dialog, as HTMx will always replace the fieldset, and i can have the dialog side by side the current content of the fieldset, that it was very confusing seeing it disappear when trying to select a new media. The cancel button could now just remove the dialog instead of making the POST, but in local it makes no difference; we’lls see what happens on production.
2023-09-22 00:11:03 +00:00
<button type="button"
data-hx-get="/admin/media/picker?name={{ .Name | queryEscape }}&amp;value={{ .Val | queryEscape }}&amp;label={{ .Label | queryEscape }}&amp;prompt={{ .Prompt | queryEscape }}"
data-hx-swap="beforeend"
>
Manage all media uploads in a single place It made no sense to have a file upload in each form that needs a media, because to reuse an existing media users would need to upload the exact same file again; this is very unusual and unfriendly. A better option is to have a “centralized” media section, where people can upload files there, and then have a picker to select from there. Ideally, there would be an upload option in the picker, but i did not add it yet. I’ve split the content from the media because i want users to have the option to update a media, for instance when they need to upload a reduced or cropped version of the same photo, without an edit they would need to upload the file as a new media and then update all places where the old version was used. And i did not want to trouble people that uploads the same photo twice: without the separate relation, doing so would throw a constraint error. I do not believe there is any security problem to have all companies link their media to the same file, as they were already readable by everyone and could upload the data from a different company to their own; in other words, it is not worse than it was now.
2023-09-20 23:56:44 +00:00
{{ if .Val -}}
<img src="/admin/media/{{ .Val }}/content" alt="">
{{ else -}}
{{( pgettext .Prompt "action" )}}
{{- end }}
</button>
{{ template "error-message" . }}
</fieldset>
{{- end }}
Replace use of L10NInput with I18nInput for campsite
2024-01-10 20:52:49 +00:00
{{ define "lang-selector" -}}
<div class="lang-selector" role="toolbar">
{{ range $lang, $input := . -}}
<button :aria-pressed="lang === '{{ $lang }}'"
@click.prevent="lang = '{{ $lang }}'">{{ $lang }}</button>
{{- end }}
</div>
{{- end }}