tandem/camper
tandem
/
camper
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 7 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
camper/test/booking.sql

254 lines
11 KiB
MySQL
Raw Normal View History

Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
-- Test booking
set client_min_messages to warning;
create extension if not exists pgtap;
reset client_min_messages;
begin;
Add marshal_payment and unmarshal_booking functions The idea is that we will marshal the payment, send it to the campsite’s instance by email, and then unmarshal it as a booking, that way we can have a one way replication from the internal to the public instance with a way back to send the payments. For testing purposes, i just create the booking in the same instance. Had to change the booking relation’s permissions to allow insert from a guest, much like for payments, because the notification from Redsys comes as a guest connection. I need this even with all the marshal/unmarshal shenanigans because not everyone will have an internal instance, thus need to allow bookings from guest connections.
2024-04-29 18:59:22 +00:00
select plan(142);
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
set search_path to camper, public;
select has_table('booking');
select has_pk('booking');
Add marshal_payment and unmarshal_booking functions The idea is that we will marshal the payment, send it to the campsite’s instance by email, and then unmarshal it as a booking, that way we can have a one way replication from the internal to the public instance with a way back to send the payments. For testing purposes, i just create the booking in the same instance. Had to change the booking relation’s permissions to allow insert from a guest, much like for payments, because the notification from Redsys comes as a guest connection. I need this even with all the marshal/unmarshal shenanigans because not everyone will have an internal instance, thus need to allow bookings from guest connections.
2024-04-29 18:59:22 +00:00
select table_privs_are('booking', 'guest', array['SELECT', 'INSERT']);
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
select table_privs_are('booking', 'employee', array['SELECT', 'INSERT', 'UPDATE']);
select table_privs_are('booking', 'admin', array['SELECT', 'INSERT', 'UPDATE', 'DELETE']);
select table_privs_are('booking', 'authenticator', array[]::text[]);
select has_column('booking', 'booking_id');
select col_is_pk('booking', 'booking_id');
select col_type_is('booking', 'booking_id', 'integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'booking_id');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'booking_id');
select has_column('booking', 'company_id');
select col_is_fk('booking', 'company_id');
select fk_ok('booking', 'company_id', 'company', 'company_id');
select col_type_is('booking', 'company_id', 'integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'company_id');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'company_id');
select has_column('booking', 'slug');
select col_is_unique('booking', 'slug');
select col_type_is('booking', 'slug', 'uuid');
select col_not_null('booking', 'slug');
select col_has_default('booking', 'slug');
select col_default_is('booking', 'slug', 'gen_random_uuid()');
select has_column('booking', 'campsite_type_id');
select col_is_fk('booking', 'campsite_type_id');
select fk_ok('booking', 'campsite_type_id', 'campsite_type', 'campsite_type_id');
select col_type_is('booking', 'campsite_type_id', 'integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'campsite_type_id');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'campsite_type_id');
select has_column('booking', 'holder_name');
select col_type_is('booking', 'holder_name', 'text');
select col_not_null('booking', 'holder_name');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'holder_name');
Show booking on booking grid I need the campsite_id in booking to know what row to show the booking at. Besides the need of knowing which actual campsite has been booked, of course. This field is nullable because we can not now it until an employee has confirmed the booking; until that point we only know the campsite type customer requested. I do not care much if the campsite_id is from a different campsite_type, because maybe the customer requested the change by phone or what have you, therefore the database can not be that strict. It must have a value if the booking is confirmed. It helps me if the arrival_date and departure_date is a single daterange, because then i can use `&&` and other range operators to work with these dates. For instance, i have to intersect it with the range displayed on the screen in order to know which day i have to put it. But then i have to know whether the booking begins and ends in the display range, because i only have to show arrival and departure (i.e., the box half-way within the first or last boxes) on these days only.
2024-04-19 19:09:28 +00:00
select has_column('booking', 'stay');
select col_type_is('booking', 'stay', 'daterange');
select col_not_null('booking', 'stay');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'stay');
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
select has_column('booking', 'number_dogs');
“Finish” the new booking form Had to bring the same fields that i have for a payment to booking, except that some of those should be nullable, because it is unreasonable to ask front desk to gather all customer data when they have a booking via phone, for instance. Therefore, i can not take advantage of the validation for customer data that i use in the public-facing form, but, fortunately, most of the validations where in separated functions, thus only had to rewrite that one for this case. I already have to create a booking from a payment, when receiving a payment from the public instance, thus i made that function and reused it here. Then i “overwrite” the newly created pre-booking with the customer data from the form, and set is as confirmed, as we do not see any point of allowing pre-bookings from employees.
2024-04-24 18:12:29 +00:00
select col_type_is('booking', 'number_dogs', 'nonnegative_integer');
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
select col_not_null('booking', 'number_dogs');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'number_dogs');
select has_column('booking', 'acsi_card');
select col_type_is('booking', 'acsi_card', 'boolean');
select col_not_null('booking', 'acsi_card');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'acsi_card');
select has_column('booking', 'booking_status');
select col_is_fk('booking', 'booking_status');
select fk_ok('booking', 'booking_status', 'booking_status', 'booking_status');
select col_type_is('booking', 'booking_status', 'text');
select col_not_null('booking', 'booking_status');
select col_has_default('booking', 'booking_status');
select col_default_is('booking', 'booking_status', 'created');
select has_column('booking', 'created_at');
select col_type_is('booking', 'created_at', 'timestamp with time zone');
select col_not_null('booking', 'created_at');
select col_has_default('booking', 'created_at');
select col_default_is('booking', 'created_at', 'CURRENT_TIMESTAMP');
“Finish” the new booking form Had to bring the same fields that i have for a payment to booking, except that some of those should be nullable, because it is unreasonable to ask front desk to gather all customer data when they have a booking via phone, for instance. Therefore, i can not take advantage of the validation for customer data that i use in the public-facing form, but, fortunately, most of the validations where in separated functions, thus only had to rewrite that one for this case. I already have to create a booking from a payment, when receiving a payment from the public instance, thus i made that function and reused it here. Then i “overwrite” the newly created pre-booking with the customer data from the form, and set is as confirmed, as we do not see any point of allowing pre-bookings from employees.
2024-04-24 18:12:29 +00:00
select has_column('booking', 'zone_preferences');
select col_type_is('booking', 'zone_preferences', 'text');
select col_not_null('booking', 'zone_preferences');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'zone_preferences');
select has_column('booking', 'address');
select col_type_is('booking', 'address', 'text');
select col_is_null('booking', 'address');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'address');
select has_column('booking', 'postal_code');
select col_type_is('booking', 'postal_code', 'text');
select col_is_null('booking', 'postal_code');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'postal_code');
select has_column('booking', 'city');
select col_type_is('booking', 'city', 'text');
select col_is_null('booking', 'city');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'city');
select has_column('booking', 'country_code');
select col_is_fk('booking', 'country_code');
select fk_ok('booking', 'country_code', 'country', 'country_code');
select col_type_is('booking', 'country_code', 'country_code');
select col_is_null('booking', 'country_code');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'country_code');
select has_column('booking', 'email');
select col_type_is('booking', 'email', 'email');
select col_is_null('booking', 'email');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'email');
select has_column('booking', 'phone');
select col_type_is('booking', 'phone', 'packed_phone_number');
select col_is_null('booking', 'phone');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'phone');
select has_column('booking', 'lang_tag');
select col_is_fk('booking', 'lang_tag');
select fk_ok('booking', 'lang_tag', 'language', 'lang_tag');
select col_type_is('booking', 'lang_tag', 'text');
select col_not_null('booking', 'lang_tag');
select col_has_default('booking', 'lang_tag');
select col_default_is('booking', 'lang_tag', 'und');
select has_column('booking', 'subtotal_nights');
select col_type_is('booking', 'subtotal_nights', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'subtotal_nights');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'subtotal_nights');
select has_column('booking', 'number_adults');
select col_type_is('booking', 'number_adults', 'positive_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'number_adults');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'number_adults');
select has_column('booking', 'subtotal_adults');
select col_type_is('booking', 'subtotal_adults', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'subtotal_adults');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'subtotal_adults');
select has_column('booking', 'number_teenagers');
select col_type_is('booking', 'number_teenagers', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'number_teenagers');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'number_teenagers');
select has_column('booking', 'subtotal_teenagers');
select col_type_is('booking', 'subtotal_teenagers', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'subtotal_teenagers');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'subtotal_teenagers');
select has_column('booking', 'number_children');
select col_type_is('booking', 'number_children', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'number_children');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'number_children');
select has_column('booking', 'subtotal_children');
select col_type_is('booking', 'subtotal_children', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'subtotal_children');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'subtotal_children');
select has_column('booking', 'subtotal_dogs');
select col_type_is('booking', 'subtotal_dogs', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'subtotal_dogs');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'subtotal_dogs');
select has_column('booking', 'subtotal_tourist_tax');
select col_type_is('booking', 'subtotal_tourist_tax', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'subtotal_tourist_tax');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'subtotal_tourist_tax');
select has_column('booking', 'total');
select col_type_is('booking', 'total', 'nonnegative_integer');
select col_not_null('booking', 'total');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'total');
select has_column('booking', 'currency_code');
select col_is_fk('booking', 'currency_code');
select fk_ok('booking', 'currency_code', 'currency', 'currency_code');
select col_type_is('booking', 'currency_code', 'currency_code');
select col_not_null('booking', 'currency_code');
select col_hasnt_default('booking', 'currency_code');
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
set client_min_messages to warning;
truncate booking cascade;
truncate campsite_type cascade;
truncate media cascade;
truncate media_content cascade;
truncate company_host cascade;
truncate company_user cascade;
truncate company cascade;
truncate auth."user" cascade;
reset client_min_messages;
insert into auth."user" (user_id, email, name, password, cookie, cookie_expires_at)
values (1, 'employee2@tandem.blog', 'Demo', 'test', '44facbb30d8a419dfd4bfbc44a4b5539d4970148dfc84bed0e', current_timestamp + interval '1 month')
, (3, 'admin2@tandem.blog', 'Admin', 'test', '6d8215c4888ffac017c3e4b8438e9a1a5559decd719df9c790', current_timestamp + interval '1 month')
, (5, 'employee4@tandem.blog', 'Demo', 'test', '12af4c88b528c2ad4222e3740496ecbc58e76e26f087657524', current_timestamp + interval '1 month')
;
Add the number of maximum nights that tourist tax applies This is required by law. I do not know why i have this value and the tax amount in the database, but the payment percent and the number of days are hardcoded. I guess i am such an inconsistent mess.
2024-02-27 18:45:47 +00:00
insert into company (company_id, business_name, vatin, trade_name, phone, email, web, address, city, province, postal_code, rtc_number, tourist_tax, tourist_tax_max_days, country_code, currency_code, default_lang_tag)
values (2, 'Company 2', 'XX123', '', '555-555-555', 'a@a', '', '', '', '', '', '', 60, 7, 'ES', 'EUR', 'ca')
, (4, 'Company 4', 'XX234', '', '666-666-666', 'b@b', '', '', '', '', '', '', 60, 7, 'FR', 'USD', 'ca')
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
;
insert into company_user (company_id, user_id, role)
values (2, 1, 'employee')
, (2, 3, 'admin')
, (4, 5, 'employee')
;
insert into company_host (company_id, host)
values (2, 'co2')
, (4, 'co4')
;
insert into media_content (media_type, bytes)
values ('image/x-xpixmap', 'static char *s[]={"1 1 1 1","a c #ffffff","a"};')
;
insert into media (media_id, company_id, original_filename, content_hash)
values (6, 2, 'cover2.xpm', sha256('static char *s[]={"1 1 1 1","a c #ffffff","a"};'))
, (8, 4, 'cover4.xpm', sha256('static char *s[]={"1 1 1 1","a c #ffffff","a"};'))
;
Add campsite_type_pet_cost relation to hold price of dogs in campsites It is a separate relation, instead of having a field in campsite_type, because not all campsite types allow dogs. I could have added a new field to campsite_type, but then its values it would be meaningless for campsites that do not allow dogs, and a nullable field is not a valid solution because NULL means “unknown”, but we **do** know the price — none. A separate relation encodes the same information without ambiguities nor null values, and, in fact, removed the dogs_allowed field from campsite_type to prevent erroneous status, such as a campsite type that allows dogs without having a cost — even if the cost is zero, it has to be added to the new relation.
2024-02-10 05:18:30 +00:00
insert into campsite_type (campsite_type_id, company_id, name, media_id, max_campers, bookable_nights)
values (10, 2, 'Wooden lodge', 6, 7, '[1, 7]')
, (12, 4, 'Bungalow', 8, 6, '[2, 6]')
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
;
“Finish” the new booking form Had to bring the same fields that i have for a payment to booking, except that some of those should be nullable, because it is unreasonable to ask front desk to gather all customer data when they have a booking via phone, for instance. Therefore, i can not take advantage of the validation for customer data that i use in the public-facing form, but, fortunately, most of the validations where in separated functions, thus only had to rewrite that one for this case. I already have to create a booking from a payment, when receiving a payment from the public instance, thus i made that function and reused it here. Then i “overwrite” the newly created pre-booking with the customer data from the form, and set is as confirmed, as we do not see any point of allowing pre-bookings from employees.
2024-04-24 18:12:29 +00:00
insert into booking (company_id, campsite_type_id, holder_name, stay, number_dogs, acsi_card, currency_code, zone_preferences, subtotal_nights, number_adults, subtotal_adults, number_teenagers, subtotal_teenagers, number_children, subtotal_children, subtotal_dogs, subtotal_tourist_tax, total)
values (2, 10, 'Holder 2', daterange('2024-01-18', '2024-01-19'), 0, false, 'EUR', '', 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
, (4, 12, 'Holder 4', daterange('2024-01-18', '2024-01-19'), 0, false, 'EUR', '', 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
;
select throws_ok(
“Finish” the new booking form Had to bring the same fields that i have for a payment to booking, except that some of those should be nullable, because it is unreasonable to ask front desk to gather all customer data when they have a booking via phone, for instance. Therefore, i can not take advantage of the validation for customer data that i use in the public-facing form, but, fortunately, most of the validations where in separated functions, thus only had to rewrite that one for this case. I already have to create a booking from a payment, when receiving a payment from the public instance, thus i made that function and reused it here. Then i “overwrite” the newly created pre-booking with the customer data from the form, and set is as confirmed, as we do not see any point of allowing pre-bookings from employees.
2024-04-24 18:12:29 +00:00
$$ insert into booking (company_id, campsite_type_id, holder_name, stay, number_dogs, acsi_card, currency_code, zone_preferences, subtotal_nights, number_adults, subtotal_adults, number_teenagers, subtotal_teenagers, number_children, subtotal_children, subtotal_dogs, subtotal_tourist_tax, total) values (2, 10, ' ', daterange('2024-01-18', '2024-01-19'), 0, false, 'EUR', '', 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) $$,
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
'23514', 'new row for relation "booking" violates check constraint "holder_name_not_empty"',
'Should not be able to add bookings with a blank holder name.'
);
select throws_ok(
“Finish” the new booking form Had to bring the same fields that i have for a payment to booking, except that some of those should be nullable, because it is unreasonable to ask front desk to gather all customer data when they have a booking via phone, for instance. Therefore, i can not take advantage of the validation for customer data that i use in the public-facing form, but, fortunately, most of the validations where in separated functions, thus only had to rewrite that one for this case. I already have to create a booking from a payment, when receiving a payment from the public instance, thus i made that function and reused it here. Then i “overwrite” the newly created pre-booking with the customer data from the form, and set is as confirmed, as we do not see any point of allowing pre-bookings from employees.
2024-04-24 18:12:29 +00:00
$$ insert into booking (company_id, campsite_type_id, holder_name, stay, number_dogs, acsi_card, currency_code, zone_preferences, subtotal_nights, number_adults, subtotal_adults, number_teenagers, subtotal_teenagers, number_children, subtotal_children, subtotal_dogs, subtotal_tourist_tax, total) values (2, 10, 'Holder', daterange('2024-01-18', '2024-01-18'), 0, false, 'EUR', '', 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) $$,
Show booking on booking grid I need the campsite_id in booking to know what row to show the booking at. Besides the need of knowing which actual campsite has been booked, of course. This field is nullable because we can not now it until an employee has confirmed the booking; until that point we only know the campsite type customer requested. I do not care much if the campsite_id is from a different campsite_type, because maybe the customer requested the change by phone or what have you, therefore the database can not be that strict. It must have a value if the booking is confirmed. It helps me if the arrival_date and departure_date is a single daterange, because then i can use `&&` and other range operators to work with these dates. For instance, i have to intersect it with the range displayed on the screen in order to know which day i have to put it. But then i have to know whether the booking begins and ends in the display range, because i only have to show arrival and departure (i.e., the box half-way within the first or last boxes) on these days only.
2024-04-19 19:09:28 +00:00
'23514', 'new row for relation "booking" violates check constraint "stay_not_empty"',
'Should not be able to add bookings with an empty stay.'
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
);
Show booking on booking grid I need the campsite_id in booking to know what row to show the booking at. Besides the need of knowing which actual campsite has been booked, of course. This field is nullable because we can not now it until an employee has confirmed the booking; until that point we only know the campsite type customer requested. I do not care much if the campsite_id is from a different campsite_type, because maybe the customer requested the change by phone or what have you, therefore the database can not be that strict. It must have a value if the booking is confirmed. It helps me if the arrival_date and departure_date is a single daterange, because then i can use `&&` and other range operators to work with these dates. For instance, i have to intersect it with the range displayed on the screen in order to know which day i have to put it. But then i have to know whether the booking begins and ends in the display range, because i only have to show arrival and departure (i.e., the box half-way within the first or last boxes) on these days only.
2024-04-19 19:09:28 +00:00
Add “part” of the bookings’ management “Part”, because it is not possible to add or actually manage any booking yet, but it has the export feature that we need to validate the project.
2024-01-18 20:05:30 +00:00
select *
from finish();
rollback;