This is required by law.
I do not know why i have this value and the tax amount in the database,
but the payment percent and the number of days are hardcoded. I guess i
am such an inconsistent mess.
I use Sortable, exactly like HTMx’s sorting example does[0]. Had to
export the slug or ID of some entries to be able to add it in the hidden
input.
For forms that use ID instead of slug, had to use an input name other
than “id” because otherwise the swap would fail due to bug #1496[1]. It
is apparently fixed in a recent version of HTMx, but i did not want to
update for fear of behaviour changes.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/sortable/
[1]: https://github.com/bigskysoftware/htmx/issues/1496
I just found out that this is a feature introduced in PostgreSQL 10,
back in 2017.
Besides this being the standard way to define an “auto incremental
column” introduced in SQL:2003[0], called “identity columns”, in
PostgreSQL the new syntax has the following pros, according to [1]:
* No need to explicitly grant usage on the generated sequence.
* Can restart the sequence with only the name of the table and column;
no need to know the sequence’s name.
* An identity column has no default, and the sequence is better
“linked” to the table, therefore you can not drop the default value
but leave the sequence around, and, conversely, can not drop the
sequence if the column is still defined.
Due to this, PostgreSQL’s authors recommendation is to use identity
columns instead of serial, unless there is the need for compatibility
with PostgreSQL older than 10[2], which is not our case.
According to PostgreSQL’s documentation[3], the identity column can be
‘GENERATED BY DEFAULT’ or ‘GENERATED ALWAYS’. In the latter case, it is
not possible to give a user-specified value when inserting unless
specifying ‘OVERRIDING SYSTEM VALUE’. I think this would make harder to
write pgTAP tests, and the old behaviour of serial, which is equivalent
to ‘GENERATED BY DEFAULT’, did not bring me any trouble so far.
[0]: https://sigmodrecord.org/publications/sigmodRecord/0403/E.JimAndrew-standard.pdf
[1]: https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/postgresql-10-identity-columns/
[2]: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Don't_Do_This#Don.27t_use_serial
[3]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-createtable.html
Seasons have a color to show on the calendar. I need them in HTML format
(e.g., #123abc) in order to set as value to `<input type="color">`, but
i did not want to save them as text in the database, as integers are
better representations of colors—in fact, that’s what the HTML syntax
also is: an integer.
I think the best would be to create an extension that adds an HTML color
type, with functions to convert from many representations (e.g., CSS’
rgb or even color names) to integer and back. However, that’s a lot of
work and i can satisfy Camper’s needs with just a couple of functions
and a domain.
To show the color on the index, at first tried to use a read-only
`<input type="color">`, but seems that this type of input can not be
read-only and must be disabled instead. However, i do not know whether
it makes sense to have a disabled input outside a form “just” to show
a color; i suspect it does not. Thus, at the end i use SVG with a
single circle, which is better that a 50%-rounded div with a background
color, even if the result is the same—SVG **is** intended for showing
pictures, which is this case.
jordi fita mas