tandem
/
numerus
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 37 Pull Requests Packages Projects 1 Releases 1 Wiki Activity
numerus/web/template/form.gohtml

202 lines
8.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add the bare-bones form for invoices
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
{{ define "hidden-field" -}}
Add the form to add products to an invoice and create invoices too Still missing: the invoice number, that requires more tables and possibly a PL/pgSQL function to do it properly.
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.InputField*/ -}}
<input type="hidden" name="{{ .Name }}"
Add the bare-bones form for invoices
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
{{- range $attribute := .Attributes }} {{$attribute}} {{ end }}
Use .String in hidden-field template, so that it works for TagsField too
2023-03-28 08:01:41 +00:00
value="{{ .String }}">
Add the bare-bones form for invoices
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
{{- end }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
{{ define "input-field" -}}
Add the form to add products to an invoice and create invoices too Still missing: the invoice number, that requires more tables and possibly a PL/pgSQL function to do it properly.
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.InputField*/ -}}
Use HTMx to add product rows “inline” in the invoice form I actually find more comfortable to select the product from the list presented up until now, but this is mostly because i have very few products and the list is not too long, so the idea is that with JavaScript we will dynamically add an empty product row to the invoice and then use the name field to search the product by name. I have the feeling that i am doing something wrong because i ended up with a lot of HTMx attribute for what i feel is not that much work, but for now it will work. I have added the `Is` field to `InputField` in order to include the `id` attribute to the HTML element, because the HTMLAttributes are attached to the `input`, not the `div`, and i felt like this one should also be a custom element based on div, like all the others. These is not yet any keyboard control to select the search results. I am not happy with having the search of products in a different URL than the index, specially since they use the exact same SQL query and ProductFilter struct, but i did not know how else ask for a different representation without resorting to the more complicated MIME types.
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
<div class="input{{ if .Errors }} has-errors{{ end }}"{{ if .Is }} is="{{ .Is }}"{{ end }}>
Add template for InputField of type textarea
2023-02-07 14:28:22 +00:00
{{ if eq .Type "textarea" }}
Allow multiple taxes, and even not tax, for products It seems that we do not agree en whether the IRPF tax should be something of the product or the contact, so we decided to make the product have multiple taxes, just in case, and if only one is needed, then users can just select one; no need to limit to one.
2023-02-08 12:47:36 +00:00
<textarea name="{{ .Name }}" id="{{ .Name }}-field"
Add template for InputField of type textarea
2023-02-07 14:28:22 +00:00
{{- range $attribute := .Attributes }} {{$attribute}} {{ end }}
Allow multiple taxes, and even not tax, for products It seems that we do not agree en whether the IRPF tax should be something of the product or the contact, so we decided to make the product have multiple taxes, just in case, and if only one is needed, then users can just select one; no need to limit to one.
2023-02-08 12:47:36 +00:00
{{ if .Required }}required="required"{{ end }} placeholder="{{ .Label }}"
>{{ .Val }}</textarea>
Add template for InputField of type textarea
2023-02-07 14:28:22 +00:00
{{ else }}
<input type="{{ .Type }}" name="{{ .Name }}" id="{{ .Name }}-field"
{{- range $attribute := .Attributes }} {{$attribute}} {{ end }}
{{ if .Required }}required="required"{{ end }} value="{{ .Val }}" placeholder="{{ .Label }}">
{{ end }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
<label for="{{ .Name }}-field">{{ .Label }}</label>
Start the tag input custom element This is more or less the same as a multiselect, except that now it adds a list of string element that you write into the search element. It is supposed to fetch a list of tag suggestions from the server, but i have not implemented it yet.
2023-03-19 22:11:40 +00:00
{{- if .Errors }}
<ul>
{{- range $error := .Errors }}
<li>{{ . }}</li>
{{- end }}
</ul>
{{- end }}
Add expense’s file input to new and edit forms I had to change MethodOverrider to check whether the form is encoded as multipart/form-data or i would not be able to get the method field from forms with files. For now i add the file manually, i.e., outside add_expense and edit_expense PL/pgSQL functions, because it was faster for me, but i will probably add an attach_to_expense function, or something like that, to avoid having the whole ON CONFLICT logic inside Golang—this belongs to the database.
2023-05-14 16:46:16 +00:00
</div>
{{- end }}
{{ define "file-field" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.FileField*/ -}}
<div class="input{{ if .Errors }} has-errors{{ end }}">
<input type="file" name="{{ .Name }}" id="{{ .Name }}-field" placeholder="{{ .Label }}">
Add a period filter for the dashboard I do not yet know whether Oriol wants a YTD or MAT period, and i went for the easiest for me: everything is MAT.
2023-05-17 10:05:30 +00:00
<label for="{{ .Name }}-field">{{ .Label }}{{ if gt .MaxSize 0 }} {{printf (pgettext "(Max. %s)" "input") (.MaxSize|humanizeBytes) }}{{ end }}</label>
Add expense’s file input to new and edit forms I had to change MethodOverrider to check whether the form is encoded as multipart/form-data or i would not be able to get the method field from forms with files. For now i add the file manually, i.e., outside add_expense and edit_expense PL/pgSQL functions, because it was faster for me, but i will probably add an attach_to_expense function, or something like that, to avoid having the whole ON CONFLICT logic inside Golang—this belongs to the database.
2023-05-14 16:46:16 +00:00
{{- if .Errors }}
<ul>
{{- range $error := .Errors }}
<li>{{ . }}</li>
{{- end }}
</ul>
{{- end }}
Start the tag input custom element This is more or less the same as a multiselect, except that now it adds a list of string element that you write into the search element. It is supposed to fetch a list of tag suggestions from the server, but i have not implemented it yet.
2023-03-19 22:11:40 +00:00
</div>
{{- end }}
{{ define "tags-field" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.InputField*/ -}}
<div class="input {{ if .Errors }}has-errors{{ end }}" is="numerus-tags">
<input type="text" name="{{ .Name }}" id="{{ .Name }}-field"
{{- range $attribute := .Attributes }} {{$attribute}} {{ end }}
Add tags for contacts too With Oriol we agreed that contacts should have tags, too, and that the “tag pool”, as it were, should be shared with the one for invoices (and all future tags we might add). I added the contact_tag relation and tag_contact function, just like with invoices, and then realized that the SQL queries that Go had to execute were becoming “complex” enough: i had to get not only the slug, but the contact id to call tag_contact, and all inside a transaction. Therefore, i opted to create the add_contact and edit_contact functions, that mirror those for invoice and products, so now each “major” section has these functions. They also simplified a bit the handling of the VATIN and phone numbers, because it is now encapsuled inside the PL/pgSQL function and Go does not know how to assemble the parts.
2023-03-26 00:32:53 +00:00
{{ if .Required }}required="required"{{ end }} value="{{ .String }}" placeholder="{{ .Label }}">
Start the tag input custom element This is more or less the same as a multiselect, except that now it adds a list of string element that you write into the search element. It is supposed to fetch a list of tag suggestions from the server, but i have not implemented it yet.
2023-03-19 22:11:40 +00:00
<label for="{{ .Name }}-field">{{ .Label }}</label>
Use a “proper” struct for the login form Similar to the profile form, the login form now parses and validates itself, with the InputField structs that the templates expect. I realized that i was doing more work than necessary when parsing fields fro the profile form because i was repeating the operation and the field name, so now it is a function of InputField. This time i needed extra attributes for the login form. I am not sure that the Go source code needs to know about HTML attributes, but it was the easiest way to pass them to the template.
2023-02-01 10:02:32 +00:00
{{- if .Errors }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
<ul>
{{- range $error := .Errors }}
<li>{{ . }}</li>
{{- end }}
</ul>
Use a “proper” struct for the login form Similar to the profile form, the login form now parses and validates itself, with the InputField structs that the templates expect. I realized that i was doing more work than necessary when parsing fields fro the profile form because i was repeating the operation and the field name, so now it is a function of InputField. This time i needed extra attributes for the login form. I am not sure that the Go source code needs to know about HTML attributes, but it was the easiest way to pass them to the template.
2023-02-01 10:02:32 +00:00
{{- end }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
</div>
{{- end }}
Add the form to add products to an invoice and create invoices too Still missing: the invoice number, that requires more tables and possibly a PL/pgSQL function to do it properly.
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
{{ define "hidden-select-field" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.SelectField*/ -}}
{{- range $selected := .Selected }}
<input type="hidden" name="{{ $.Name }}"
{{- range $attribute := $.Attributes }} {{$attribute}} {{ end }}
value="{{ . }}">
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
{{ define "select-field" -}}
Add the form to add products to an invoice and create invoices too Still missing: the invoice number, that requires more tables and possibly a PL/pgSQL function to do it properly.
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.SelectField*/ -}}
Reimplement the multiselect as a custom element What i really set off on was to refactor the multiselect’s x-data context to a separate JavaScript file. I did not see the need at first, thinking that it would not matter because it was used only in a template and i was not duplicating the code in my files. However, i then realized that having the context in the template means the visitor has to download it each and every time it accesses a form with a multiselect, even if nothing changed, and, worse, it would download it multiple times if there were many multiselect controls. It makes more sense to put all that into a file that the browser would only download and parse once, if the proper caching is set. Once i realized that, it was a shame that AlpineJS has no way to do the same for the HTML structure[0], for the exact same reasons: not wanting to download many times the same extra <template> and other markup required to build the control for JavaScript users. And then i remembered that this is supposed to be custom element’s main selling point. At first i tried to create a shadow DOW to replace the <select> with the same <div> and <ul> that i used with Alpine, but it turns out that <select> is not one of the allowed elements that can have a shadow root attached[0]. Therefore, i changed the custom element to extend the <div> for the <select> and <label> instead—the same element that had the x-init context—, but i would have to define or include all the styles inside the shadow DOM, and bring the lang attribute, for it to look like it did before. Out with the shadow DOM, and modify the <div>’s contents instead. At this point the code was so far removed from the declarative way that AlpineJS promotes that i did not see much value on using it, except for its reactivity. But, given that this is such a small component, at the end decided to write it all in plain JavaScript. It is more code, at least looking only at the code i had to write, but i love how i only have to add an is="numerus-multiselect" attribute to HTML for it to work. [0]: https://github.com/alpinejs/alpine/discussions/1205 [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/attachShadow
2023-03-17 13:55:12 +00:00
<div class="input{{ if .Errors }} has-errors{{ end }}"{{ if .Multiple }} is="numerus-multiselect"{{ end -}}>
Handle tax details and new tax forms with structs and validation I implemented the Valuer and Scanner interfaces to InputField and SelectField for better passing values between the database and Go. I had a conflict with the Value name and renamed the struct member to Val. I also had to change the attributes array to be of type template.HTMLAttr or html/template would replace `form="newtax"` attribute to `zgotmplz="newtax"` because it deems it “unsafe”. I do not like having to use template.HTMLAttr when assigning values, but i do not know what else i can do now.
2023-02-01 13:15:02 +00:00
<select id="{{ .Name }}-field" name="{{ .Name }}"
Allow optional select with empty label This is not yet necessary, but the empty label is because i do not want to select a default tax for products—at least, not without a setting for it. Since i need to add the required attribute now to select, because otherwise the browser would allow sending that empty value, i did not want to do it unconditionally, just in case.
2023-02-05 13:06:33 +00:00
{{- range $attribute := .Attributes }} {{$attribute}} {{ end -}}
Add grouping for form’s select field We will only allow to select a tax from each of the tax classes, but the user needs to know what class each tax belongs to, and grouping the taxes by class in the select helps with that.
2023-03-01 10:40:23 +00:00
{{ if .Multiple }} multiple="multiple"{{ end -}}
{{ if .Required }} required="required"{{ end -}}
Handle tax details and new tax forms with structs and validation I implemented the Valuer and Scanner interfaces to InputField and SelectField for better passing values between the database and Go. I had a conflict with the Value name and renamed the struct member to Val. I also had to change the attributes array to be of type template.HTMLAttr or html/template would replace `form="newtax"` attribute to `zgotmplz="newtax"` because it deems it “unsafe”. I do not like having to use template.HTMLAttr when assigning values, but i do not know what else i can do now.
2023-02-01 13:15:02 +00:00
>
Allow optional select with empty label This is not yet necessary, but the empty label is because i do not want to select a default tax for products—at least, not without a setting for it. Since i need to add the required attribute now to select, because otherwise the browser would allow sending that empty value, i did not want to do it unconditionally, just in case.
2023-02-05 13:06:33 +00:00
{{- with .EmptyLabel }}
<option value="">{{ . }}</option>
{{- end}}
Add grouping for form’s select field We will only allow to select a tax from each of the tax classes, but the user needs to know what class each tax belongs to, and grouping the taxes by class in the select helps with that.
2023-03-01 10:40:23 +00:00
{{- $withinGroup := "" -}}
Allow optional select with empty label This is not yet necessary, but the empty label is because i do not want to select a default tax for products—at least, not without a setting for it. Since i need to add the required attribute now to select, because otherwise the browser would allow sending that empty value, i did not want to do it unconditionally, just in case.
2023-02-05 13:06:33 +00:00
{{- range $option := .Options }}
Add grouping for form’s select field We will only allow to select a tax from each of the tax classes, but the user needs to know what class each tax belongs to, and grouping the taxes by class in the select helps with that.
2023-03-01 10:40:23 +00:00
{{- if ne .Group $withinGroup }}
{{- if ne $withinGroup "" }}
</optgroup>
{{ end }}
<optgroup label="{{ .Group }}">
{{- $withinGroup = .Group -}}
{{ end }}
Allow optional select with empty label This is not yet necessary, but the empty label is because i do not want to select a default tax for products—at least, not without a setting for it. Since i need to add the required attribute now to select, because otherwise the browser would allow sending that empty value, i did not want to do it unconditionally, just in case.
2023-02-05 13:06:33 +00:00
<option value="{{ .Value }}"
Allow multiple taxes, and even not tax, for products It seems that we do not agree en whether the IRPF tax should be something of the product or the contact, so we decided to make the product have multiple taxes, just in case, and if only one is needed, then users can just select one; no need to limit to one.
2023-02-08 12:47:36 +00:00
{{- if $.IsSelected .Value }} selected="selected"{{ end }}>{{ .Label }}</option>
Add grouping for form’s select field We will only allow to select a tax from each of the tax classes, but the user needs to know what class each tax belongs to, and grouping the taxes by class in the select helps with that.
2023-03-01 10:40:23 +00:00
{{- end }}
{{- if ne $withinGroup "" }}
</optgroup>
Allow optional select with empty label This is not yet necessary, but the empty label is because i do not want to select a default tax for products—at least, not without a setting for it. Since i need to add the required attribute now to select, because otherwise the browser would allow sending that empty value, i did not want to do it unconditionally, just in case.
2023-02-05 13:06:33 +00:00
{{- end }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
</select>
<label for="{{ .Name }}-field">{{ .Label }}</label>
Handle tax details and new tax forms with structs and validation I implemented the Valuer and Scanner interfaces to InputField and SelectField for better passing values between the database and Go. I had a conflict with the Value name and renamed the struct member to Val. I also had to change the attributes array to be of type template.HTMLAttr or html/template would replace `form="newtax"` attribute to `zgotmplz="newtax"` because it deems it “unsafe”. I do not like having to use template.HTMLAttr when assigning values, but i do not know what else i can do now.
2023-02-01 13:15:02 +00:00
{{- if .Errors }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
<ul>
{{- range $error := .Errors }}
<li>{{ . }}</li>
{{- end }}
</ul>
Handle tax details and new tax forms with structs and validation I implemented the Valuer and Scanner interfaces to InputField and SelectField for better passing values between the database and Go. I had a conflict with the Value name and renamed the struct member to Val. I also had to change the attributes array to be of type template.HTMLAttr or html/template would replace `form="newtax"` attribute to `zgotmplz="newtax"` because it deems it “unsafe”. I do not like having to use template.HTMLAttr when assigning values, but i do not know what else i can do now.
2023-02-01 13:15:02 +00:00
{{- end }}
Validate profile form and use templates for fields Let’s start first with a non-fancy validation method with just if conditionals instead of bringing yet another complicated library. I hope i do not regret it. I wanted to move all the input field to a template because all that gobbledygook with the .input div and repeating the label in the placeholder was starting to annoy me. Now with error messages was even more concerning. I did not know whether the label should be a part of the input fields or something that the template should do. At the end i decided that it makes more sense to be part of the input field because in the error messages i use that same label, thus the template does not have a say in that, and, besides, it was just easier to write the template. The same with the error messages: i’ve seen frameworks that have a map with the field’s id/name to the error slice, but then it would be a bit harder to write the template. I added AddError functions instead of just using append inside the validator function, and have a local variable for whether it all went OK, because i was worried that i would leave out the `ok = false` in some conditions. I had started writing “constructors” functions for InputField and SelectField, but then had to add other methods to change the required field and who knows what else, and in the end it was easier to just construct the field inline.
2023-01-31 14:40:12 +00:00
</div>
{{- end }}
Replace use of <select> for tags “and” and “or” with checkboxes I realized that using a select for just two, short, options is overkill: the select and its options use a lot more real state than the two radios, which can have tooltips (not yet, though). Since i am going to replace this field with a custom element that has a toggle-like aspect, i already added the is="numerus-toggle" attribute and use it for stying the non-JavaScript field.
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
{{ define "toggle-field" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.ToggleField*/ -}}
“Integrate” the tags’ condition into the input field We have reconsidered the toggle thing and instead moved the selection into a little menu on top of the input, like the input’s label does à la Material Design. I just moved the checkboxes into a new details, that works as a menu, but i had to add the type="search" to the existing input in the tags field, or the CSS would style the checkboxes as well. I do not do anything when the checkbox selection changes because that already triggers a POST to the server that returns the new HTML with the checkbox changed, and the JavaScript only has to retrieve that new structure, exactly as it does in the initial rendering. Since we want to add a little description to the options, i no longer can use the same SelectOption in ToggleField, even though i could have reused the Group element, but that felt wrong.
2023-04-16 17:01:11 +00:00
<fieldset id="{{ .Name}}-field" class="input{{ if .Errors }} has-errors{{ end }}" is="numerus-toggle">
Replace use of <select> for tags “and” and “or” with checkboxes I realized that using a select for just two, short, options is overkill: the select and its options use a lot more real state than the two radios, which can have tooltips (not yet, though). Since i am going to replace this field with a custom element that has a toggle-like aspect, i already added the is="numerus-toggle" attribute and use it for stying the non-JavaScript field.
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
<legend>{{ .Label }}</legend>
“Integrate” the tags’ condition into the input field We have reconsidered the toggle thing and instead moved the selection into a little menu on top of the input, like the input’s label does à la Material Design. I just moved the checkboxes into a new details, that works as a menu, but i had to add the type="search" to the existing input in the tags field, or the CSS would style the checkboxes as well. I do not do anything when the checkbox selection changes because that already triggers a POST to the server that returns the new HTML with the checkbox changed, and the JavaScript only has to retrieve that new structure, exactly as it does in the initial rendering. Since we want to add a little description to the options, i no longer can use the same SelectOption in ToggleField, even though i could have reused the Group element, but that felt wrong.
2023-04-16 17:01:11 +00:00
<label title="{{.FirstOption.Description }}">
<input type="radio" name="{{ .Name }}" value="{{ .FirstOption.Value }}"
{{ if eq .Selected .FirstOption.Value }}checked{{ end }}>
{{ .FirstOption.Label }}
</label>
<label title="{{ .SecondOption.Description }}">
<input type="radio" name="{{ .Name }}" value="{{ .SecondOption.Value }}"
{{ if eq .Selected .SecondOption.Value }}checked{{ end }}>
{{ .SecondOption.Label }}
</label>
Replace use of <select> for tags “and” and “or” with checkboxes I realized that using a select for just two, short, options is overkill: the select and its options use a lot more real state than the two radios, which can have tooltips (not yet, though). Since i am going to replace this field with a custom element that has a toggle-like aspect, i already added the is="numerus-toggle" attribute and use it for stying the non-JavaScript field.
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
</fieldset>
{{- end }}
Refactor the invoice product form template I was using the exact same form from edit and new pages of invoice, which is not too bad considering it won’t change very often, but i now want to be able to add new empty product lines with the add product button, and i will need to have a template for that form, which would mean a third copy.
2023-04-20 13:37:22 +00:00
Add a period filter for the dashboard I do not yet know whether Oriol wants a YTD or MAT period, and i went for the easiest for me: everything is MAT.
2023-05-17 10:05:30 +00:00
{{ define "radio-field" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.RadioField*/ -}}
<fieldset id="{{ .Name}}-field" class="input radio{{ if .Errors }} has-errors{{ end }}">
<legend>{{ .Label }}</legend>
{{- range $option := .Options }}
<label><input type="radio" name="{{$.Name}}" value="{{.Value}}" {{- if $.IsSelected .Value }} checked="checked"{{ end }}> {{.Label}}</label>
{{- end }}
{{- if .Errors }}
<ul>
{{- range $error := .Errors }}
<li>{{ . }}</li>
{{- end }}
</ul>
{{- end }}
</fieldset>
{{- end }}
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
{{ define "check-field" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.CheckField*/ -}}
<input id="{{ .Name }}-field" type="checkbox" name="{{.Name}}"{{ if .Checked}} checked="checked"{{ end }}{{ if .Required }} required="required"{{ end }}>
<label for="{{ .Name }}-field">{{.Label }}</label>
{{- end }}
Refactor the invoice product form template I was using the exact same form from edit and new pages of invoice, which is not too bad considering it won’t change very often, but i now want to be able to add new empty product lines with the add product button, and i will need to have a template for that form, which would mean a third copy.
2023-04-20 13:37:22 +00:00
{{ define "invoice-product-form" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.invoiceProductForm*/ -}}
Use HTMx to add product rows “inline” in the invoice form I actually find more comfortable to select the product from the list presented up until now, but this is mostly because i have very few products and the list is not too long, so the idea is that with JavaScript we will dynamically add an empty product row to the invoice and then use the name field to search the product by name. I have the feeling that i am doing something wrong because i ended up with a lot of HTMx attribute for what i feel is not that much work, but for now it will work. I have added the `Is` field to `InputField` in order to include the `id` attribute to the HTML element, because the HTMLAttributes are attached to the `input`, not the `div`, and i felt like this one should also be a custom element based on div, like all the others. These is not yet any keyboard control to select the search results. I am not happy with having the search of products in a different URL than the index, specially since they use the exact same SQL query and ProductFilter struct, but i did not know how else ask for a different representation without resorting to the more complicated MIME types.
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
<fieldset class="new-invoice-product"
data-hx-select="unset"
data-hx-vals='{"index": {{ .Index }}}'
data-hx-include="[name='product.quantity.{{ .Index }}']"
>
Use HTMx to delete and restore invoice products It is better that way because it works without JavaScript; if HTMx is not available, it will just use regulars forms. The problem is that most of the submit buttons where using formaction to send the request to a different action, and only one button was the “real” action. Since i could not pass the formaction to invoice-product-form template, i have changed the “default” action to the one with “ancillary” functions. I have to use a different action to remove for each product because i can not pass the index to the backend without JavaScript: it only depends on the button click, that already has a name for the action. Thus, in a way, i have “merged” the action and the index in a single name.
2023-05-28 22:01:11 +00:00
<button type="submit" class="icon delete-product"
formnovalidate
name="action" value="remove-product.{{ .Index }}"
Add delete button to remove a product from the invoice form With this button, it is no longer necessary to set the quantity to zero to remove, at least not with JavaScript. This is why i am using Alpine: to use x-cloak and hide it from non-JavaScript users. Although, i wonder if it would not be better to use HTMx for that?
2023-05-26 11:51:10 +00:00
aria-label="{{( gettext "Delete product from invoice" )}}"
><i class="ri-delete-back-2-line"></i></button>
Use HTMx to add product rows “inline” in the invoice form I actually find more comfortable to select the product from the list presented up until now, but this is mostly because i have very few products and the list is not too long, so the idea is that with JavaScript we will dynamically add an empty product row to the invoice and then use the name field to search the product by name. I have the feeling that i am doing something wrong because i ended up with a lot of HTMx attribute for what i feel is not that much work, but for now it will work. I have added the `Is` field to `InputField` in order to include the `id` attribute to the HTML element, because the HTMLAttributes are attached to the `input`, not the `div`, and i felt like this one should also be a custom element based on div, like all the others. These is not yet any keyboard control to select the search results. I am not happy with having the search of products in a different URL than the index, specially since they use the exact same SQL query and ProductFilter struct, but i did not know how else ask for a different representation without resorting to the more complicated MIME types.
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
{{ template "hidden-field" .InvoiceProductId }}
{{ template "hidden-field" .ProductId }}
{{ template "input-field" .Name }}
{{ template "input-field" .Price }}
{{ template "input-field" .Quantity }}
{{ template "input-field" .Discount }}
Change the rows of the product description to 1
2023-05-23 13:25:55 +00:00
{{ template "input-field" .Description | addInputAttr `rows="1"`}}
Use HTMx to add product rows “inline” in the invoice form I actually find more comfortable to select the product from the list presented up until now, but this is mostly because i have very few products and the list is not too long, so the idea is that with JavaScript we will dynamically add an empty product row to the invoice and then use the name field to search the product by name. I have the feeling that i am doing something wrong because i ended up with a lot of HTMx attribute for what i feel is not that much work, but for now it will work. I have added the `Is` field to `InputField` in order to include the `id` attribute to the HTML element, because the HTMLAttributes are attached to the `input`, not the `div`, and i felt like this one should also be a custom element based on div, like all the others. These is not yet any keyboard control to select the search results. I am not happy with having the search of products in a different URL than the index, specially since they use the exact same SQL query and ProductFilter struct, but i did not know how else ask for a different representation without resorting to the more complicated MIME types.
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
{{ template "select-field" .Tax }}
</fieldset>
Refactor the invoice product form template I was using the exact same form from edit and new pages of invoice, which is not too bad considering it won’t change very often, but i now want to be able to add new empty product lines with the add product button, and i will need to have a template for that form, which would mean a third copy.
2023-04-20 13:37:22 +00:00
{{- end }}
Toggle filters forms I tried this already when i started adding filters, but i tried to use AlpineJS for that, and could not because it would reset the context each time i submitted the filters, due to HTMx replacing the whole content. I realized that the only thing i need is some “flag” to show and hide the form with CSS. I do not even need AlpineJS for that, but i used it anyway because then i can use the x-cloak thing to hidde the toggle button for users with JavaScript disabled. Similarly, the body by default has that “flag” set in the markup, and is removed when AlpineJS is initialized, thus if JavaScript is disabled the filters form is shown nevertheless.
2023-05-24 10:13:09 +00:00
Add HTTP controller and view to add quotes It still does not support quotes without contact or payment.
2023-06-07 14:35:31 +00:00
{{ define "quote-product-form" -}}
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.quoteProductForm*/ -}}
<fieldset class="new-quote-product"
data-hx-select="unset"
data-hx-vals='{"index": {{ .Index }}}'
data-hx-include="[name='product.quantity.{{ .Index }}']"
>
<button type="submit" class="icon delete-product"
formnovalidate
name="action" value="remove-product.{{ .Index }}"
aria-label="{{( gettext "Delete product from quotation" )}}"
><i class="ri-delete-back-2-line"></i></button>
{{ template "hidden-field" .QuoteProductId }}
{{ template "hidden-field" .ProductId }}
{{ template "input-field" .Name }}
{{ template "input-field" .Price }}
{{ template "input-field" .Quantity }}
{{ template "input-field" .Discount }}
{{ template "input-field" .Description | addInputAttr `rows="1"`}}
{{ template "select-field" .Tax }}
</fieldset>
{{- end }}
Toggle filters forms I tried this already when i started adding filters, but i tried to use AlpineJS for that, and could not because it would reset the context each time i submitted the filters, due to HTMx replacing the whole content. I realized that the only thing i need is some “flag” to show and hide the form with CSS. I do not even need AlpineJS for that, but i used it anyway because then i can use the x-cloak thing to hidde the toggle button for users with JavaScript disabled. Similarly, the body by default has that “flag” set in the markup, and is removed when AlpineJS is initialized, thus if JavaScript is disabled the filters form is shown nevertheless.
2023-05-24 10:13:09 +00:00
{{ define "filters-toggle" -}}
<button id="filters-toggle" x-cloak x-data="{}"
@click="document.body.classList.toggle('filters-visible')"
type="button">{{(pgettext "Filters" "action")}}</button>
{{- end }}