2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ define "title" -}}
|
|
|
|
{{( pgettext "Invoices" "title" )}}
|
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-20 12:09:52 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ define "breadcrumbs" -}}
|
|
|
|
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.InvoicesIndexPage*/ -}}
|
2023-07-07 09:16:43 +00:00
|
|
|
<nav data-hx-target="main">
|
|
|
|
<p data-hx-boost="true">
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
<a href="{{ companyURI "/" }}">{{( pgettext "Home" "title" )}}</a> /
|
|
|
|
<a>{{( pgettext "Invoices" "title" )}}</a>
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<form id="batch-form" action="{{ companyURI "/invoices/batch" }}" method="post">
|
|
|
|
{{ csrfToken }}
|
Add option to export the list of quotes, invoices, and expenses to ODS
This was requested by a potential user, as they want to be able to do
whatever they want to do to these lists with a spreadsheet.
In fact, they requested to be able to export to CSV, but, as always,
using CSV is a minefield because of Microsoft: since their Excel product
is fucking unable to write and read CSV from different locales, even if
using the same exact Excel product, i can not also create a CSV file
that is guaranteed to work on all locales. If i used the non-standard
sep=; thing to tell Excel that it is a fucking stupid application, then
proper applications would show that line as a row, which is the correct
albeit undesirable behaviour.
The solution is to use a spreadsheet file format that does not have this
issue. As far as I know, by default Excel is able to read XLSX and ODS
files, but i refuse to use the artificially complex, not the actually
used in Excel, and lobbied standard that Microsoft somehow convinced ISO
to publish, as i am using a different format because of the mess they
made, and i do not want to bend over in front of them, so ODS it is.
ODS is neither an elegant or good format by any means, but at least i
can write them using simple strings, because there is no ODS library
in Debian and i am not going to write yet another DEB package for an
overengineered package to write a simple table—all i want is to say
“here are these n columns, and these m columns; have a good day!”.
Part of #51.
2023-07-18 11:29:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ with .Filters }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-select-field" .Customer }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-select-field" .InvoiceStatus }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-field" .FromDate }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-field" .ToDate }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-field" .InvoiceNumber }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-field" .Tags }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "hidden-field" .TagsCondition }}
|
|
|
|
{{ end }}
|
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>
|
2023-05-24 10:13:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ template "filters-toggle" }}
|
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
|
|
|
<button type="submit"
|
|
|
|
name="action" value="download"
|
|
|
|
>{{( pgettext "Download invoices" "action" )}}</button>
|
Add option to export the list of quotes, invoices, and expenses to ODS
This was requested by a potential user, as they want to be able to do
whatever they want to do to these lists with a spreadsheet.
In fact, they requested to be able to export to CSV, but, as always,
using CSV is a minefield because of Microsoft: since their Excel product
is fucking unable to write and read CSV from different locales, even if
using the same exact Excel product, i can not also create a CSV file
that is guaranteed to work on all locales. If i used the non-standard
sep=; thing to tell Excel that it is a fucking stupid application, then
proper applications would show that line as a row, which is the correct
albeit undesirable behaviour.
The solution is to use a spreadsheet file format that does not have this
issue. As far as I know, by default Excel is able to read XLSX and ODS
files, but i refuse to use the artificially complex, not the actually
used in Excel, and lobbied standard that Microsoft somehow convinced ISO
to publish, as i am using a different format because of the mess they
made, and i do not want to bend over in front of them, so ODS it is.
ODS is neither an elegant or good format by any means, but at least i
can write them using simple strings, because there is no ODS library
in Debian and i am not going to write yet another DEB package for an
overengineered package to write a simple table—all i want is to say
“here are these n columns, and these m columns; have a good day!”.
Part of #51.
2023-07-18 11:29:36 +00:00
|
|
|
<button type="submit"
|
|
|
|
name="action" value="export"
|
|
|
|
>{{( pgettext "Export list" "action" )}}</button>
|
2023-07-07 09:16:43 +00:00
|
|
|
<a class="primary button" data-hx-boost="true"
|
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
|
|
|
href="{{ companyURI "/invoices/new" }}">{{( pgettext "New invoice" "action" )}}</a>
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
</form>
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
</nav>
|
2023-03-20 12:09:52 +00:00
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-20 12:09:52 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ define "content" }}
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{{- /*gotype: dev.tandem.ws/tandem/numerus/pkg.InvoicesIndexPage*/ -}}
|
2023-05-24 10:13:09 +00:00
|
|
|
<form class="filters" method="GET" action="{{ companyURI "/invoices"}}"
|
|
|
|
data-hx-target="main" data-hx-boost="true" data-hx-trigger="change,search,submit"
|
|
|
|
aria-labelledby="filters-toggle"
|
|
|
|
>
|
2023-07-16 18:56:11 +00:00
|
|
|
<fieldset>
|
|
|
|
{{ with .Filters }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "select-field" .Customer }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "select-field" .InvoiceStatus }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "input-field" .FromDate }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "input-field" .ToDate }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "input-field" .InvoiceNumber }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "tags-field" .Tags | addTagsAttr (print `data-conditions="` .TagsCondition.Name `-field"`) }}
|
|
|
|
{{ template "toggle-field" .TagsCondition }}
|
|
|
|
{{ end }}
|
|
|
|
</fieldset>
|
2023-05-24 10:13:09 +00:00
|
|
|
<noscript>
|
|
|
|
<button type="submit">{{( pgettext "Filter" "action" )}}</button>
|
|
|
|
</noscript>
|
2023-07-16 18:56:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ if .Filters.HasValue }}
|
|
|
|
<a href="{{ companyURI "/invoices" }}" class="button">{{( pgettext "Reset" "action" )}}</a>
|
|
|
|
{{ end }}
|
2023-05-24 10:13:09 +00:00
|
|
|
</form>
|
2023-05-23 21:13:21 +00:00
|
|
|
<table id="invoice-list">
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
<thead>
|
|
|
|
<tr>
|
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "All" "invoice" )}}</th>
|
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Date" "title" )}}</th>
|
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Invoice Num." "title" )}}</th>
|
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Customer" "title" )}}</th>
|
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Status" "title" )}}</th>
|
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Tags" "title" )}}</th>
|
2023-02-22 13:39:38 +00:00
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Amount" "title" )}}</th>
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Download" "title" )}}</th>
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
<th>{{( pgettext "Actions" "title" )}}</th>
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
</thead>
|
|
|
|
<tbody>
|
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ with .Invoices }}
|
|
|
|
{{- range $invoice := . }}
|
|
|
|
<tr>
|
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ $title := .Number | printf (pgettext "Select invoice %v" "action") }}
|
|
|
|
<td><input type="checkbox" form="batch-form"
|
|
|
|
name="invoice" value="{{ .Slug }}"
|
|
|
|
aria-label="{{ $title }}"
|
|
|
|
title="{{ $title }}"/></td>
|
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
|
|
|
<td>{{ .Date|formatDate }}</td>
|
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
|
|
|
<td><a href="{{ companyURI "/invoices/"}}{{ .Slug }}" data-hx-target="main"
|
|
|
|
data-hx-boost="true">{{ .Number }}</a></td>
|
2023-03-28 07:50:19 +00:00
|
|
|
<td>{{ .CustomerName }}</td>
|
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
<td>
|
|
|
|
<details class="invoice-status menu">
|
|
|
|
<summary class="invoice-status-{{ .Status }}">{{ .StatusLabel }}</summary>
|
2023-10-02 16:48:28 +00:00
|
|
|
<form action="{{companyURI "/invoices/"}}{{ .Slug }}" method="POST"
|
|
|
|
enctype="multipart/form-data" data-hx-boost="true">
|
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ csrfToken }}
|
|
|
|
{{ putMethod }}
|
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
|
|
|
<input type="hidden" name="quick" value="status">
|
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
<ul role="menu">
|
|
|
|
{{- range $status, $name := $.InvoiceStatuses }}
|
|
|
|
{{- if ne $status $invoice.Status }}
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
<li role="presentation">
|
|
|
|
<button role="menuitem" type="submit"
|
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
|
|
|
name="invoice_status" value="{{ $status }}"
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
class="invoice-status-{{ $status }}"
|
|
|
|
>{{ $name }}</button>
|
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
</form>
|
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
<td data-hx-get="{{companyURI "/invoices/"}}{{ .Slug }}/tags/edit"
|
|
|
|
data-hx-target="this"
|
|
|
|
data-hx-swap="outerHTML"
|
|
|
|
>
|
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{{- range $index, $tag := .Tags }}
|
|
|
|
{{- if gt $index 0 }}, {{ end -}}
|
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ . }}
|
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
2023-02-22 13:39:38 +00:00
|
|
|
<td class="numeric">{{ .Total|formatPrice }}</td>
|
2023-07-06 09:49:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{{- $title = .Number | printf (pgettext "Download invoice %s" "action") -}}
|
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
<td class="invoice-download"><a href="{{ companyURI "/invoices/"}}{{ .Slug }}.pdf"
|
2023-07-07 09:32:59 +00:00
|
|
|
download="{{ .Number}}-{{ .CustomerName | slugify}}.pdf"
|
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
|
|
|
title="{{( pgettext "Download invoice" "action" )}}"
|
2023-07-06 09:49:36 +00:00
|
|
|
aria-label="{{ $title }}"><i
|
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
|
|
|
class="ri-download-line"></i></a></td>
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
<td class="actions">
|
|
|
|
<details class="menu">
|
2023-07-06 09:49:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{{- $title = .Number | printf (gettext "Actions for invoice %s") -}}
|
|
|
|
<summary aria-label="{{ $title }}"><i class="ri-more-line"></i></summary>
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
<ul role="menu" class="action-menu">
|
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
|
|
|
<li role="presentation">
|
2023-03-31 11:01:26 +00:00
|
|
|
<a role="menuitem" href="{{ companyURI "/invoices"}}/{{ .Slug }}/edit"
|
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
|
|
|
data-hx-target="main" data-hx-boost="true"
|
2023-03-31 11:01:26 +00:00
|
|
|
>
|
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
|
|
|
<i class="ri-edit-line"></i>
|
|
|
|
{{( pgettext "Edit" "action" )}}
|
|
|
|
</a>
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
<li role="presentation">
|
Show the duplicate invoice form in a dialog
Had to add a new hidden field to the form to know whether, when the
request is HTMx-triggered, to refresh the page, as i do when duplicating
from the index, or redirect the client to the new invoice’s view page,
but only if i was duplicating from that same page, not the index.
Since i now have to target main when redirecting to the view page, so
i had to add a location structure with the required json fields and all
that, when “refreshing” i actually tell HTMx to open the index page
again, which seems faster, now that i am used to boosted links.
2023-04-04 12:39:55 +00:00
|
|
|
<a role="menuitem" href="{{ companyURI "/invoices/new"}}?duplicate={{ .Slug }}"
|
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
|
|
|
data-hx-target="main" data-hx-boost="true"
|
Show the duplicate invoice form in a dialog
Had to add a new hidden field to the form to know whether, when the
request is HTMx-triggered, to refresh the page, as i do when duplicating
from the index, or redirect the client to the new invoice’s view page,
but only if i was duplicating from that same page, not the index.
Since i now have to target main when redirecting to the view page, so
i had to add a location structure with the required json fields and all
that, when “refreshing” i actually tell HTMx to open the index page
again, which seems faster, now that i am used to boosted links.
2023-04-04 12:39:55 +00:00
|
|
|
>
|
2023-03-08 10:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
<i class="ri-file-copy-line"></i>
|
|
|
|
{{( pgettext "Duplicate" "action" )}}
|
|
|
|
</a>
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
|
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|
|
|
|
{{ else }}
|
|
|
|
<tr>
|
2023-05-14 16:47:16 +00:00
|
|
|
<td colspan="9">{{( gettext "No invoices added yet." )}}</td>
|
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
|
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
{{ end }}
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
</tbody>
|
2023-06-20 09:33:28 +00:00
|
|
|
{{ if .Invoices }}
|
|
|
|
<tfoot>
|
|
|
|
<tr>
|
|
|
|
<th scope="row" colspan="6">{{( gettext "Total" )}}</th>
|
|
|
|
<td class="numeric">{{ .TotalAmount|formatPrice }}</td>
|
|
|
|
<td colspan="2"></td>
|
|
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
</tfoot>
|
|
|
|
{{ end }}
|
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
|
|
|
</table>
|
|
|
|
{{- end }}
|