2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
package pkg
import (
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
"archive/zip"
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
"bytes"
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
"context"
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
"errors"
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
"fmt"
"github.com/julienschmidt/httprouter"
"html/template"
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
"io"
"log"
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
"math"
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
"net/http"
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
"os"
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
"os/exec"
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
"sort"
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
"strconv"
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
"strings"
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
"time"
)
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
type InvoiceEntry struct {
Slug string
Date time . Time
Number string
2023-02-22 13:39:38 +00:00
Total string
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
CustomerName string
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
Tags [ ] string
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
Status string
StatusLabel string
}
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
type InvoicesIndexPage struct {
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
Invoices [ ] * InvoiceEntry
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
Filters * invoiceFilterForm
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
InvoiceStatuses map [ string ] string
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
func IndexInvoices ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , _ httprouter . Params ) {
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
conn := getConn ( r )
locale := getLocale ( r )
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
filters := newInvoiceFilterForm ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale , company )
if err := filters . Parse ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
return
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
page := & InvoicesIndexPage {
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
Invoices : mustCollectInvoiceEntries ( r . Context ( ) , conn , company , locale , filters ) ,
Filters : filters ,
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
InvoiceStatuses : mustCollectInvoiceStatuses ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale ) ,
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
2023-03-23 09:55:02 +00:00
mustRenderMainTemplate ( w , r , "invoices/index.gohtml" , page )
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
func mustCollectInvoiceEntries ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , company * Company , locale * Locale , filters * invoiceFilterForm ) [ ] * InvoiceEntry {
args := [ ] interface { } { locale . Language . String ( ) , company . Id }
where := [ ] string { "invoice.company_id = $2" }
appendWhere := func ( expression string , value interface { } ) {
args = append ( args , value )
where = append ( where , fmt . Sprintf ( expression , len ( args ) ) )
}
maybeAppendWhere := func ( expression string , value string , conv func ( string ) interface { } ) {
if value != "" {
if conv == nil {
appendWhere ( expression , value )
} else {
appendWhere ( expression , conv ( value ) )
}
}
}
maybeAppendWhere ( "contact_id = $%d" , filters . Customer . String ( ) , func ( v string ) interface { } {
customerId , _ := strconv . Atoi ( filters . Customer . Selected [ 0 ] )
return customerId
} )
maybeAppendWhere ( "invoice.invoice_status = $%d" , filters . InvoiceStatus . String ( ) , nil )
maybeAppendWhere ( "invoice_number = $%d" , filters . InvoiceNumber . String ( ) , nil )
maybeAppendWhere ( "invoice_date >= $%d" , filters . FromDate . String ( ) , nil )
maybeAppendWhere ( "invoice_date <= $%d" , filters . ToDate . String ( ) , nil )
if len ( filters . Tags . Tags ) > 0 {
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
if filters . TagsCondition . Selected == "and" {
2023-04-14 00:40:48 +00:00
appendWhere ( "invoice.tags @> $%d" , filters . Tags )
} else {
appendWhere ( "invoice.tags && $%d" , filters . Tags )
}
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
}
rows := conn . MustQuery ( ctx , fmt . Sprintf ( `
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
select invoice . slug
, invoice_date
, invoice_number
, contact . business_name
Replace tag relations with array attributes
It all started when i wanted to try to filter invoices by multiple tags
using an “AND”, instead of “OR” as it was doing until now. But
something felt off and seemed to me that i was doing thing much more
complex than needed, all to be able to list the tags as a suggestion
in the input field—which i am not doing yet.
I found this article series[0] exploring different approaches for
tagging, which includes the one i was using, and comparing their
performance. I have not actually tested it, but it seems that i have
chosen the worst option, in both query time and storage.
I attempted to try using an array attribute to each table, which is more
or less the same they did in the articles but without using a separate
relation for tags, and i found out that all the queries were way easier
to write, and needed two joins less, so it was a no-brainer.
[0]: http://www.databasesoup.com/2015/01/tag-all-things.html
2023-04-07 19:31:35 +00:00
, invoice . tags
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
, invoice . invoice_status
, isi18n . name
, to_price ( total , decimal_digits )
from invoice
join contact using ( contact_id )
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
join invoice_status_i18n isi18n on invoice . invoice_status = isi18n . invoice_status and isi18n . lang_tag = $ 1
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
join invoice_amount using ( invoice_id )
join currency using ( currency_code )
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
where ( % s )
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
order by invoice_date desc
, invoice_number desc
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
` , strings . Join ( where , ") AND (" ) ) , args ... )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
defer rows . Close ( )
var entries [ ] * InvoiceEntry
for rows . Next ( ) {
entry := & InvoiceEntry { }
2023-03-28 07:50:19 +00:00
if err := rows . Scan ( & entry . Slug , & entry . Date , & entry . Number , & entry . CustomerName , & entry . Tags , & entry . Status , & entry . StatusLabel , & entry . Total ) ; err != nil {
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
panic ( err )
}
entries = append ( entries , entry )
}
if rows . Err ( ) != nil {
panic ( rows . Err ( ) )
}
return entries
}
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
func mustCollectInvoiceStatuses ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , locale * Locale ) map [ string ] string {
rows := conn . MustQuery ( ctx , "select invoice_status.invoice_status, isi18n.name from invoice_status join invoice_status_i18n isi18n using(invoice_status) where isi18n.lang_tag = $1 order by invoice_status" , locale . Language . String ( ) )
defer rows . Close ( )
statuses := map [ string ] string { }
for rows . Next ( ) {
var key , name string
if err := rows . Scan ( & key , & name ) ; err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
statuses [ key ] = name
}
if rows . Err ( ) != nil {
panic ( rows . Err ( ) )
}
return statuses
}
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
type invoiceFilterForm struct {
locale * Locale
company * Company
Customer * SelectField
InvoiceStatus * SelectField
InvoiceNumber * InputField
FromDate * InputField
ToDate * InputField
Tags * TagsField
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
TagsCondition * ToggleField
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
}
func newInvoiceFilterForm ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , locale * Locale , company * Company ) * invoiceFilterForm {
return & invoiceFilterForm {
locale : locale ,
company : company ,
Customer : & SelectField {
Name : "customer" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Customer" , locale ) ,
EmptyLabel : gettext ( "All customers" , locale ) ,
2023-05-03 10:40:07 +00:00
Options : mustGetContactOptions ( ctx , conn , company ) ,
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
} ,
InvoiceStatus : & SelectField {
Name : "invoice_status" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Invoice Status" , locale ) ,
EmptyLabel : gettext ( "All status" , locale ) ,
Options : MustGetOptions ( ctx , conn , "select invoice_status.invoice_status, isi18n.name from invoice_status join invoice_status_i18n isi18n using(invoice_status) where isi18n.lang_tag = $1 order by invoice_status" , locale . Language . String ( ) ) ,
} ,
InvoiceNumber : & InputField {
Name : "number" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Invoice Number" , locale ) ,
Trigger filter form on change and search, as well as submit as before
Changed the invoice number field’s type to search to add the delete icon
on Chromium. Firefox does not add that icon, but i do not care; it is
still better that type="text".
Had to emit the change event to the numerus-tag field, otherwise the
form would not detect the change.
I also can not use keyup as a trigger because the changed modifier can
not be used in the <form>, as nothing ever changes, i do not know how to
trigger the form from children (i.e., data-hx-trigger on the <input>
does nothing), and i can not trigger for just any keyup, or i would
make the request even if they only moved the cursor with the arrow keys,
which is very confusing as Firefox resets the position (this may be due
the fact that i reload the whole <main>, but still).
2023-04-03 10:45:15 +00:00
Type : "search" ,
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
} ,
FromDate : & InputField {
Name : "from_date" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "From Date" , locale ) ,
Type : "date" ,
} ,
ToDate : & InputField {
Name : "to_date" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "To Date" , locale ) ,
Type : "date" ,
} ,
Tags : & TagsField {
Name : "tags" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Tags" , locale ) ,
} ,
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
TagsCondition : & ToggleField {
2023-04-14 00:40:48 +00:00
Name : "tags_condition" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Tags Condition" , locale ) ,
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
Selected : "and" ,
2023-04-16 17:01:11 +00:00
FirstOption : & ToggleOption {
Value : "and" ,
Label : pgettext ( "tag condition" , "All" , locale ) ,
Description : gettext ( "Invoices must have all the specified labels." , locale ) ,
2023-04-15 02:05:59 +00:00
} ,
2023-04-16 17:01:11 +00:00
SecondOption : & ToggleOption {
Value : "or" ,
Label : pgettext ( "tag condition" , "Any" , locale ) ,
Description : gettext ( "Invoices must have at least one of the specified labels." , locale ) ,
2023-04-14 00:40:48 +00:00
} ,
} ,
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
}
}
func ( form * invoiceFilterForm ) Parse ( r * http . Request ) error {
if err := r . ParseForm ( ) ; err != nil {
return err
}
form . Customer . FillValue ( r )
form . InvoiceStatus . FillValue ( r )
form . InvoiceNumber . FillValue ( r )
form . FromDate . FillValue ( r )
form . ToDate . FillValue ( r )
form . Tags . FillValue ( r )
2023-04-14 00:40:48 +00:00
form . TagsCondition . FillValue ( r )
Add filters form for invoices
Instead of using links in the invoice tags, that we will replace with a
“click-to-edit field”, with Oriol agreed to add a form with filters that
includes not only the tags but also dates, customer, status, and the
invoice number.
This means i now need dynamic SQL, and i do not think this belongs to
the database (i.e., no PL/pgSQL function for that). I have looked at
query builder libraries for Golang, and did not find anything that
suited me: either they wanted to manage not only the SQL query but also
all structs, or they managed to confuse Goland’s SQL analyzer.
For now, at least, i am using a very simple approach with arrays, that
still confuses Goland’s analyzer, but just in a very specific part,
which i find tolerable—not that their analyzer is that great to begin
with, but that’s a story for another day.
2023-03-29 14:16:31 +00:00
return nil
}
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
func ServeInvoice ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
slug := params [ 0 ] . Value
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
switch slug {
case "new" :
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
locale := getLocale ( r )
form := newInvoiceForm ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale , company )
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
if invoiceToDuplicate := r . URL . Query ( ) . Get ( "duplicate" ) ; invoiceToDuplicate != "" {
form . MustFillFromDatabase ( r . Context ( ) , conn , invoiceToDuplicate )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
form . InvoiceStatus . Selected = [ ] string { "created" }
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
}
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
form . Date . Val = time . Now ( ) . Format ( "2006-01-02" )
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusOK )
mustRenderNewInvoiceForm ( w , r , form )
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
case "product-form" :
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
query := r . URL . Query ( )
index , _ := strconv . Atoi ( query . Get ( "index" ) )
conn := getConn ( r )
form := newInvoiceProductForm ( index , company , getLocale ( r ) , mustGetTaxOptions ( r . Context ( ) , conn , company ) )
slug := query . Get ( "slug" )
if len ( slug ) > 0 {
if ! form . MustFillFromDatabase ( r . Context ( ) , conn , slug ) {
http . NotFound ( w , r )
return
}
quantity , _ := strconv . Atoi ( query . Get ( "product.quantity." + strconv . Itoa ( index ) ) )
if quantity > 0 {
form . Quantity . Val = strconv . Itoa ( quantity )
}
w . Header ( ) . Set ( HxTriggerAfterSettle , "recompute" )
}
mustRenderStandaloneTemplate ( w , r , "invoices/product-form.gohtml" , form )
default :
pdf := false
if strings . HasSuffix ( slug , ".pdf" ) {
pdf = true
slug = slug [ : len ( slug ) - len ( ".pdf" ) ]
}
inv := mustGetInvoice ( r . Context ( ) , conn , company , slug )
if inv == nil {
http . NotFound ( w , r )
return
}
if pdf {
w . Header ( ) . Set ( "Content-Type" , "application/pdf" )
mustWriteInvoicePdf ( w , r , inv )
} else {
mustRenderMainTemplate ( w , r , "invoices/view.gohtml" , inv )
}
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
}
}
func mustWriteInvoicePdf ( w io . Writer , r * http . Request , inv * invoice ) {
cmd := exec . Command ( "weasyprint" , "--format" , "pdf" , "--stylesheet" , "web/static/invoice.css" , "-" , "-" )
var stderr bytes . Buffer
cmd . Stderr = & stderr
stdin , err := cmd . StdinPipe ( )
if err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
stdout , err := cmd . StdoutPipe ( )
if err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
defer func ( ) {
err := stdout . Close ( )
if ! errors . Is ( err , os . ErrClosed ) {
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
panic ( err )
}
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
} ( )
if err = cmd . Start ( ) ; err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
go func ( ) {
defer mustClose ( stdin )
mustRenderAppTemplate ( stdin , r , "invoices/view.gohtml" , inv )
} ( )
if _ , err = io . Copy ( w , stdout ) ; err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
if err := cmd . Wait ( ) ; err != nil {
log . Printf ( "ERR - %v\n" , stderr . String ( ) )
panic ( err )
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
}
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
}
2023-02-27 11:55:18 +00:00
func mustClose ( closer io . Closer ) {
if err := closer . Close ( ) ; err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
}
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
type invoice struct {
2023-03-05 17:50:57 +00:00
Number string
Slug string
Date time . Time
Invoicer taxDetails
Invoicee taxDetails
Notes string
PaymentInstructions string
Products [ ] * invoiceProduct
Subtotal string
Taxes [ ] [ ] string
TaxClasses [ ] string
HasDiscounts bool
Total string
LegalDisclaimer string
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
}
type taxDetails struct {
Name string
VATIN string
Address string
City string
PostalCode string
Province string
Email string
Phone string
}
type invoiceProduct struct {
Name string
Description string
Price string
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
Discount int
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
Quantity int
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
Taxes map [ string ] int
Subtotal string
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
Total string
}
func mustGetInvoice ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , company * Company , slug string ) * invoice {
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint
Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many
people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for
the invoice.
I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean
maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i
would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not
know Groff or TeX that well.
I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can
be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running
Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a
daemon.
I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF,
much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS
standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow
break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does.
To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user,
passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice
as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint
does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but
then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much
work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less
likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API.
Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python
back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to
WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
inv := & invoice {
Slug : slug ,
}
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
var invoiceId int
var decimalDigits int
2023-03-05 17:50:57 +00:00
if notFoundErrorOrPanic ( conn . QueryRow ( ctx , "select invoice_id, decimal_digits, invoice_number, invoice_date, notes, instructions, business_name, vatin, phone, email, address, city, province, postal_code, to_price(subtotal, decimal_digits), to_price(total, decimal_digits) from invoice join payment_method using (payment_method_id) join contact using (contact_id) join invoice_amount using (invoice_id) join currency using (currency_code) where invoice.slug = $1" , slug ) . Scan ( & invoiceId , & decimalDigits , & inv . Number , & inv . Date , & inv . Notes , & inv . PaymentInstructions , & inv . Invoicee . Name , & inv . Invoicee . VATIN , & inv . Invoicee . Phone , & inv . Invoicee . Email , & inv . Invoicee . Address , & inv . Invoicee . City , & inv . Invoicee . Province , & inv . Invoicee . PostalCode , & inv . Subtotal , & inv . Total ) ) {
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
return nil
}
2023-03-02 09:24:44 +00:00
if err := conn . QueryRow ( ctx , "select business_name, vatin, phone, email, address, city, province, postal_code, legal_disclaimer from company where company_id = $1" , company . Id ) . Scan ( & inv . Invoicer . Name , & inv . Invoicer . VATIN , & inv . Invoicer . Phone , & inv . Invoicer . Email , & inv . Invoicer . Address , & inv . Invoicer . City , & inv . Invoicer . Province , & inv . Invoicer . PostalCode , & inv . LegalDisclaimer ) ; err != nil {
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
panic ( err )
}
if err := conn . QueryRow ( ctx , "select array_agg(array[name, to_price(amount, $2)]) from invoice_tax_amount join tax using (tax_id) where invoice_id = $1" , invoiceId , decimalDigits ) . Scan ( & inv . Taxes ) ; err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
2023-04-01 14:07:26 +00:00
rows := conn . MustQuery ( ctx , "select invoice_product.name, description, to_price(price, $2), (discount_rate * 100)::integer, quantity, to_price(subtotal, $2), to_price(total, $2), array_agg(array[tax_class.name, (tax_rate * 100)::integer::text]) filter (where tax_rate is not null) from invoice_product join invoice_product_amount using (invoice_product_id) left join invoice_product_tax using (invoice_product_id) left join tax using (tax_id) left join tax_class using (tax_class_id) where invoice_id = $1 group by invoice_product.name, description, discount_rate, price, quantity, subtotal, total" , invoiceId , decimalDigits )
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
defer rows . Close ( )
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
taxClasses := map [ string ] bool { }
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
for rows . Next ( ) {
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
product := & invoiceProduct {
Taxes : make ( map [ string ] int ) ,
}
var taxes [ ] [ ] string
if err := rows . Scan ( & product . Name , & product . Description , & product . Price , & product . Discount , & product . Quantity , & product . Subtotal , & product . Total , & taxes ) ; err != nil {
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
panic ( err )
}
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
for _ , tax := range taxes {
taxClass := tax [ 0 ]
taxClasses [ taxClass ] = true
product . Taxes [ taxClass ] , _ = strconv . Atoi ( tax [ 1 ] )
}
if product . Discount > 0 {
inv . HasDiscounts = true
}
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
inv . Products = append ( inv . Products , product )
}
2023-03-01 13:08:12 +00:00
for taxClass := range taxClasses {
inv . TaxClasses = append ( inv . TaxClasses , taxClass )
}
sort . Strings ( inv . TaxClasses )
2023-02-24 11:22:15 +00:00
if rows . Err ( ) != nil {
panic ( rows . Err ( ) )
}
return inv
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
2023-02-23 14:31:57 +00:00
type newInvoicePage struct {
Form * invoiceForm
Subtotal string
Taxes [ ] [ ] string
Total string
}
func newNewInvoicePage ( form * invoiceForm , r * http . Request ) * newInvoicePage {
page := & newInvoicePage {
Form : form ,
}
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
err := conn . QueryRow ( r . Context ( ) , "select subtotal, taxes, total from compute_new_invoice_amount($1, $2)" , company . Id , NewInvoiceProductArray ( form . Products ) ) . Scan ( & page . Subtotal , & page . Taxes , & page . Total )
if err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
return page
}
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
func mustRenderNewInvoiceForm ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , form * invoiceForm ) {
2023-02-14 11:55:19 +00:00
locale := getLocale ( r )
form . Customer . EmptyLabel = gettext ( "Select a customer to bill." , locale )
2023-02-23 14:31:57 +00:00
page := newNewInvoicePage ( form , r )
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
mustRenderMainTemplate ( w , r , "invoices/new.gohtml" , page )
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
func mustRenderNewInvoiceProductsForm ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , action string , form * invoiceForm ) {
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
page := newInvoiceProductsPage {
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
Action : companyURI ( company , action ) ,
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
Form : form ,
Products : mustGetProductChoices ( r . Context ( ) , conn , company ) ,
}
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
mustRenderMainTemplate ( w , r , "invoices/products.gohtml" , page )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
func mustGetProductChoices ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , company * Company ) [ ] * productChoice {
2023-04-26 11:50:02 +00:00
rows := conn . MustQuery ( ctx , "select product.slug, product.name, to_price(price, decimal_digits) from product join company using (company_id) join currency using (currency_code) where company_id = $1 order by name" , company . Id )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
defer rows . Close ( )
var choices [ ] * productChoice
for rows . Next ( ) {
entry := & productChoice { }
2023-04-26 11:50:02 +00:00
if err := rows . Scan ( & entry . Slug , & entry . Name , & entry . Price ) ; err != nil {
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
panic ( err )
}
choices = append ( choices , entry )
}
if rows . Err ( ) != nil {
panic ( rows . Err ( ) )
}
return choices
}
type newInvoiceProductsPage struct {
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
Action string
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
Form * invoiceForm
Products [ ] * productChoice
}
type productChoice struct {
2023-04-26 11:50:02 +00:00
Slug string
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
Name string
Price string
}
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
func HandleAddInvoice ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , _ httprouter . Params ) {
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
locale := getLocale ( r )
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
form := newInvoiceForm ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale , company )
if err := form . Parse ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
return
}
if err := verifyCsrfTokenValid ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusForbidden )
return
}
2023-02-27 12:13:28 +00:00
if ! form . Validate ( ) {
2023-04-19 17:18:29 +00:00
if ! IsHTMxRequest ( r ) {
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusUnprocessableEntity )
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
mustRenderNewInvoiceForm ( w , r , form )
2023-02-27 12:13:28 +00:00
return
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
Remove the number field from new invoice form
Initially, this field was meant to be left almost always blank, except
for when we deleted invoiced and had to “replace” its number with a new
invoice; using the automatic numbering in this cas would not “fill in”
the missing number in the sequence.
However, we decide to not allow removing invoicer not edit their
numbers, therefore, if everything goes as planned, there should not be
any gap in the sequence, and that field is rendered useless.
Oriol suggested making it a read-only field, both for new and edit
forms, but i do not think it makes sense to have a field if you can not
edit it at all, specially in the new invoice dialog, where it would
always be blank. In the edit form we already show the number in the
title and breadcrumbs, thus no need for the read-only field as
reference.
I still keep a Number member to the form struct, but is now a string
(kind of “a read-only field”, in a way) and just to be written in the
title or breadcrumbs. I did not like the idea of adding a new SQL
query just for that value.
2023-04-01 13:57:56 +00:00
slug := conn . MustGetText ( r . Context ( ) , "" , "select add_invoice($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7)" , company . Id , form . Date , form . Customer , form . Notes , form . PaymentMethod , form . Tags , NewInvoiceProductArray ( form . Products ) )
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
htmxRedirect ( w , r , companyURI ( company , "/invoices/" + slug ) )
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
func HandleNewInvoiceAction ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
switch params [ 0 ] . Value {
case "new" :
handleInvoiceAction ( w , r , "/invoices/new" , mustRenderNewInvoiceForm )
case "batch" :
HandleBatchInvoiceAction ( w , r , params )
2023-02-27 12:13:28 +00:00
default :
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
http . Error ( w , "Method Not Allowed" , http . StatusMethodNotAllowed )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
2023-03-09 11:11:53 +00:00
func HandleBatchInvoiceAction ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , _ httprouter . Params ) {
if err := r . ParseForm ( ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
return
}
if err := verifyCsrfTokenValid ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusForbidden )
return
}
slugs := r . Form [ "invoice" ]
if len ( slugs ) == 0 {
http . Redirect ( w , r , companyURI ( mustGetCompany ( r ) , "/invoices" ) , http . StatusSeeOther )
return
}
locale := getLocale ( r )
switch r . Form . Get ( "action" ) {
case "download" :
invoices := mustWriteInvoicesPdf ( r , slugs )
w . Header ( ) . Set ( "Content-Type" , "application/zip" )
w . Header ( ) . Set ( "Content-Disposition" , fmt . Sprintf ( "attachment; filename=%s" , gettext ( "invoices.zip" , locale ) ) )
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusOK )
if _ , err := w . Write ( invoices ) ; err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
default :
http . Error ( w , gettext ( "Invalid action" , locale ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
}
}
func mustWriteInvoicesPdf ( r * http . Request , slugs [ ] string ) [ ] byte {
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
buf := new ( bytes . Buffer )
w := zip . NewWriter ( buf )
for _ , slug := range slugs {
inv := mustGetInvoice ( r . Context ( ) , conn , company , slug )
if inv == nil {
continue
}
f , err := w . Create ( inv . Number + ".pdf" )
if err != nil {
panic ( err )
}
mustWriteInvoicePdf ( f , r , inv )
}
mustClose ( w )
return buf . Bytes ( )
}
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
type invoiceForm struct {
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
locale * Locale
company * Company
Remove the number field from new invoice form
Initially, this field was meant to be left almost always blank, except
for when we deleted invoiced and had to “replace” its number with a new
invoice; using the automatic numbering in this cas would not “fill in”
the missing number in the sequence.
However, we decide to not allow removing invoicer not edit their
numbers, therefore, if everything goes as planned, there should not be
any gap in the sequence, and that field is rendered useless.
Oriol suggested making it a read-only field, both for new and edit
forms, but i do not think it makes sense to have a field if you can not
edit it at all, specially in the new invoice dialog, where it would
always be blank. In the edit form we already show the number in the
title and breadcrumbs, thus no need for the read-only field as
reference.
I still keep a Number member to the form struct, but is now a string
(kind of “a read-only field”, in a way) and just to be written in the
title or breadcrumbs. I did not like the idea of adding a new SQL
query just for that value.
2023-04-01 13:57:56 +00:00
Number string
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
InvoiceStatus * SelectField
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
Customer * SelectField
Date * InputField
Notes * InputField
PaymentMethod * SelectField
Add tags for contacts too
With Oriol we agreed that contacts should have tags, too, and that the
“tag pool”, as it were, should be shared with the one for invoices (and
all future tags we might add).
I added the contact_tag relation and tag_contact function, just like
with invoices, and then realized that the SQL queries that Go had to
execute were becoming “complex” enough: i had to get not only the slug,
but the contact id to call tag_contact, and all inside a transaction.
Therefore, i opted to create the add_contact and edit_contact functions,
that mirror those for invoice and products, so now each “major” section
has these functions. They also simplified a bit the handling of the
VATIN and phone numbers, because it is now encapsuled inside the
PL/pgSQL function and Go does not know how to assemble the parts.
2023-03-26 00:32:53 +00:00
Tags * TagsField
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
Products [ ] * invoiceProductForm
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
func newInvoiceForm ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , locale * Locale , company * Company ) * invoiceForm {
return & invoiceForm {
locale : locale ,
company : company ,
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
InvoiceStatus : & SelectField {
Name : "invoice_status" ,
Required : true ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Invoice Status" , locale ) ,
Selected : [ ] string { "created" } ,
Options : MustGetOptions ( ctx , conn , "select invoice_status.invoice_status, isi18n.name from invoice_status join invoice_status_i18n isi18n using(invoice_status) where isi18n.lang_tag = $1 order by invoice_status" , locale . Language . String ( ) ) ,
} ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
Customer : & SelectField {
Name : "customer" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Customer" , locale ) ,
Required : true ,
2023-05-03 10:40:07 +00:00
Options : mustGetContactOptions ( ctx , conn , company ) ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
} ,
Date : & InputField {
Name : "date" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Invoice Date" , locale ) ,
Type : "date" ,
Required : true ,
} ,
Notes : & InputField {
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
Name : "notes" ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Notes" , locale ) ,
Type : "textarea" ,
} ,
Add tags for contacts too
With Oriol we agreed that contacts should have tags, too, and that the
“tag pool”, as it were, should be shared with the one for invoices (and
all future tags we might add).
I added the contact_tag relation and tag_contact function, just like
with invoices, and then realized that the SQL queries that Go had to
execute were becoming “complex” enough: i had to get not only the slug,
but the contact id to call tag_contact, and all inside a transaction.
Therefore, i opted to create the add_contact and edit_contact functions,
that mirror those for invoice and products, so now each “major” section
has these functions. They also simplified a bit the handling of the
VATIN and phone numbers, because it is now encapsuled inside the
PL/pgSQL function and Go does not know how to assemble the parts.
2023-03-26 00:32:53 +00:00
Tags : & TagsField {
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
Name : "tags" ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Tags" , locale ) ,
} ,
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
PaymentMethod : & SelectField {
Name : "payment_method" ,
Required : true ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Payment Method" , locale ) ,
Selected : [ ] string { conn . MustGetText ( ctx , "" , "select default_payment_method_id::text from company where company_id = $1" , company . Id ) } ,
Options : MustGetOptions ( ctx , conn , "select payment_method_id::text, name from payment_method where company_id = $1" , company . Id ) ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
} ,
}
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
func ( form * invoiceForm ) Parse ( r * http . Request ) error {
if err := r . ParseForm ( ) ; err != nil {
return err
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
form . InvoiceStatus . FillValue ( r )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
form . Customer . FillValue ( r )
form . Date . FillValue ( r )
form . Notes . FillValue ( r )
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
form . Tags . FillValue ( r )
2023-03-08 10:19:59 +00:00
form . PaymentMethod . FillValue ( r )
2023-02-13 09:32:26 +00:00
if _ , ok := r . Form [ "product.id.0" ] ; ok {
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
taxOptions := mustGetTaxOptions ( r . Context ( ) , getConn ( r ) , form . company )
2023-02-13 09:32:26 +00:00
for index := 0 ; true ; index ++ {
if _ , ok := r . Form [ "product.id." + strconv . Itoa ( index ) ] ; ! ok {
break
}
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
productForm := newInvoiceProductForm ( index , form . company , form . locale , taxOptions )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
if err := productForm . Parse ( r ) ; err != nil {
return err
}
form . Products = append ( form . Products , productForm )
}
}
return nil
}
func ( form * invoiceForm ) Validate ( ) bool {
validator := newFormValidator ( )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
validator . CheckValidSelectOption ( form . InvoiceStatus , gettext ( "Selected invoice status is not valid." , form . locale ) )
validator . CheckValidSelectOption ( form . Customer , gettext ( "Selected customer is not valid." , form . locale ) )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
if validator . CheckRequiredInput ( form . Date , gettext ( "Invoice date can not be empty." , form . locale ) ) {
validator . CheckValidDate ( form . Date , gettext ( "Invoice date must be a valid date." , form . locale ) )
}
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
validator . CheckValidSelectOption ( form . PaymentMethod , gettext ( "Selected payment method is not valid." , form . locale ) )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
allOK := validator . AllOK ( )
for _ , product := range form . Products {
allOK = product . Validate ( ) && allOK
}
return allOK
}
func ( form * invoiceForm ) Update ( ) {
products := form . Products
form . Products = nil
2023-02-21 12:57:40 +00:00
for n , product := range products {
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
if product . Quantity . Val != "0" {
2023-04-24 18:40:10 +00:00
product . Update ( )
2023-02-21 12:57:40 +00:00
if n != len ( form . Products ) {
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
product . Index = len ( form . Products )
product . Rename ( )
2023-02-21 12:57:40 +00:00
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
form . Products = append ( form . Products , product )
}
}
}
2023-04-26 11:50:02 +00:00
const selectProductBySlug = `
select ' '
, product_id
, name
, description
, to_price ( price , decimal_digits )
, 1 as quantity
, 0 as discount
, array_remove ( array_agg ( tax_id ) , null )
from product
join company using ( company_id )
join currency using ( currency_code )
left join product_tax using ( product_id )
where product . slug = any ( $ 1 )
group by product_id
, name
, description
, price
, decimal_digits
`
func ( form * invoiceForm ) AddProducts ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , productsSlug [ ] string ) {
form . mustAddProductsFromQuery ( ctx , conn , selectProductBySlug , productsSlug )
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
}
func ( form * invoiceForm ) mustAddProductsFromQuery ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , sql string , args ... interface { } ) {
2023-02-27 12:13:28 +00:00
index := len ( form . Products )
2023-03-05 17:43:22 +00:00
taxOptions := mustGetTaxOptions ( ctx , conn , form . company )
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
rows := conn . MustQuery ( ctx , sql , args ... )
2023-02-27 12:13:28 +00:00
defer rows . Close ( )
for rows . Next ( ) {
2023-03-04 21:15:52 +00:00
product := newInvoiceProductForm ( index , form . company , form . locale , taxOptions )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
if err := rows . Scan ( product . InvoiceProductId , product . ProductId , product . Name , product . Description , product . Price , product . Quantity , product . Discount , product . Tax ) ; err != nil {
2023-02-27 12:13:28 +00:00
panic ( err )
}
form . Products = append ( form . Products , product )
index ++
}
if rows . Err ( ) != nil {
panic ( rows . Err ( ) )
}
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
func ( form * invoiceForm ) MustFillFromDatabase ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , slug string ) bool {
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
var invoiceId int
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
selectedInvoiceStatus := form . InvoiceStatus . Selected
form . InvoiceStatus . Clear ( )
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
selectedPaymentMethod := form . PaymentMethod . Selected
form . PaymentMethod . Clear ( )
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
if notFoundErrorOrPanic ( conn . QueryRow ( ctx , `
select invoice_id
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
, invoice_status
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
, contact_id
, invoice_number
, invoice_date
, notes
, payment_method_id
Replace tag relations with array attributes
It all started when i wanted to try to filter invoices by multiple tags
using an “AND”, instead of “OR” as it was doing until now. But
something felt off and seemed to me that i was doing thing much more
complex than needed, all to be able to list the tags as a suggestion
in the input field—which i am not doing yet.
I found this article series[0] exploring different approaches for
tagging, which includes the one i was using, and comparing their
performance. I have not actually tested it, but it seems that i have
chosen the worst option, in both query time and storage.
I attempted to try using an array attribute to each table, which is more
or less the same they did in the articles but without using a separate
relation for tags, and i found out that all the queries were way easier
to write, and needed two joins less, so it was a no-brainer.
[0]: http://www.databasesoup.com/2015/01/tag-all-things.html
2023-04-07 19:31:35 +00:00
, array_to_string ( tags , ',' )
2023-03-10 13:02:55 +00:00
from invoice
Replace tag relations with array attributes
It all started when i wanted to try to filter invoices by multiple tags
using an “AND”, instead of “OR” as it was doing until now. But
something felt off and seemed to me that i was doing thing much more
complex than needed, all to be able to list the tags as a suggestion
in the input field—which i am not doing yet.
I found this article series[0] exploring different approaches for
tagging, which includes the one i was using, and comparing their
performance. I have not actually tested it, but it seems that i have
chosen the worst option, in both query time and storage.
I attempted to try using an array attribute to each table, which is more
or less the same they did in the articles but without using a separate
relation for tags, and i found out that all the queries were way easier
to write, and needed two joins less, so it was a no-brainer.
[0]: http://www.databasesoup.com/2015/01/tag-all-things.html
2023-04-07 19:31:35 +00:00
where slug = $ 1
Remove the number field from new invoice form
Initially, this field was meant to be left almost always blank, except
for when we deleted invoiced and had to “replace” its number with a new
invoice; using the automatic numbering in this cas would not “fill in”
the missing number in the sequence.
However, we decide to not allow removing invoicer not edit their
numbers, therefore, if everything goes as planned, there should not be
any gap in the sequence, and that field is rendered useless.
Oriol suggested making it a read-only field, both for new and edit
forms, but i do not think it makes sense to have a field if you can not
edit it at all, specially in the new invoice dialog, where it would
always be blank. In the edit form we already show the number in the
title and breadcrumbs, thus no need for the read-only field as
reference.
I still keep a Number member to the form struct, but is now a string
(kind of “a read-only field”, in a way) and just to be written in the
title or breadcrumbs. I did not like the idea of adding a new SQL
query just for that value.
2023-04-01 13:57:56 +00:00
` , slug ) . Scan ( & invoiceId , form . InvoiceStatus , form . Customer , & form . Number , form . Date , form . Notes , form . PaymentMethod , form . Tags ) ) {
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
form . PaymentMethod . Selected = selectedPaymentMethod
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
form . InvoiceStatus . Selected = selectedInvoiceStatus
return false
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
}
form . Products = [ ] * invoiceProductForm { }
Move the product_id field from invoice_product to a separate table
We are going to allow invoices with products that are not (yet) inserted
into the products table.
We always allowed to have products in invoices with a totally different
name, description, price, and whatnot, but until now we had the product
id in these invoice lines for statistics purposes.
However, Oriol raised the concern that this requires for the products
to be inserted before we can create an invoice with them, and we do not
plan to have a “create product while invoicing” feature, thus it would
mean that people would need to cancel the new invoice, create the new
product, and then start the invoice again from scratch.
The compromise is to allow products in the invoice that do not have a
product_id, meaning that at the time the invoice was created they were
not (yet) in the products table. Oriol sees this stop-invoice-create-
product issue more important than the accurate statistics of product
sales, as it will probably be only one or two units off, anyway.
I did not want to allow NULL values to the invoice product’s product_id
field, because NULL means “dunno” instead of “no product”, so i had to
split that field to a separate table that relates an invoice product
with a registered product.
2023-04-19 17:30:12 +00:00
form . mustAddProductsFromQuery ( ctx , conn , "select invoice_product_id::text, coalesce(product_id, 0), name, description, to_price(price, $2), quantity, (discount_rate * 100)::integer, array_remove(array_agg(tax_id), null) from invoice_product left join invoice_product_product using (invoice_product_id) left join invoice_product_tax using (invoice_product_id) where invoice_id = $1 group by invoice_product_id, coalesce(product_id, 0), name, description, discount_rate, price, quantity" , invoiceId , form . company . DecimalDigits )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
return true
2023-03-08 10:26:02 +00:00
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
func mustGetTaxOptions ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , company * Company ) [ ] * SelectOption {
2023-03-01 10:40:23 +00:00
return MustGetGroupedOptions ( ctx , conn , "select tax_id::text, tax.name, tax_class.name from tax join tax_class using (tax_class_id) where tax.company_id = $1 order by tax_class.name, tax.name" , company . Id )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
2023-05-03 10:40:07 +00:00
func mustGetContactOptions ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , company * Company ) [ ] * SelectOption {
return MustGetOptions ( ctx , conn , "select contact_id::text, business_name from contact where company_id = $1 order by business_name" , company . Id )
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
type invoiceProductForm struct {
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
locale * Locale
company * Company
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
Index int
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
InvoiceProductId * InputField
ProductId * InputField
Name * InputField
Description * InputField
Price * InputField
Quantity * InputField
Discount * InputField
Tax * SelectField
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
func newInvoiceProductForm ( index int , company * Company , locale * Locale , taxOptions [ ] * SelectOption ) * invoiceProductForm {
2023-04-27 22:22:28 +00:00
triggerRecompute := template . HTMLAttr ( ` data-hx-on="change: this.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('recompute', { bubbles: true}))" ` )
2023-02-21 12:57:40 +00:00
form := & invoiceProductForm {
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
locale : locale ,
company : company ,
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
Index : index ,
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
InvoiceProductId : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Id" , locale ) ,
Type : "hidden" ,
Required : true ,
} ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
ProductId : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Id" , locale ) ,
Type : "hidden" ,
Required : true ,
} ,
Name : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Name" , locale ) ,
Type : "text" ,
Required : true ,
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
Is : "numerus-product-search" ,
Attributes : [ ] template . HTMLAttr {
` autocomplete="off" ` ,
` data-hx-trigger="keyup changed delay:200" ` ,
` data-hx-target="next .options" ` ,
` data-hx-indicator="closest div" ` ,
` data-hx-swap="innerHTML" ` ,
template . HTMLAttr ( fmt . Sprintf ( ` data-hx-get="%v" ` , companyURI ( company , "/search/products" ) ) ) ,
} ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
} ,
Description : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Description" , locale ) ,
Type : "textarea" ,
} ,
Price : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Price" , locale ) ,
Type : "number" ,
Required : true ,
Attributes : [ ] template . HTMLAttr {
2023-04-27 22:22:28 +00:00
triggerRecompute ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
` min="0" ` ,
template . HTMLAttr ( fmt . Sprintf ( ` step="%v" ` , company . MinCents ( ) ) ) ,
} ,
} ,
Quantity : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Quantity" , locale ) ,
Type : "number" ,
Required : true ,
Attributes : [ ] template . HTMLAttr {
2023-04-27 22:22:28 +00:00
triggerRecompute ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
` min="0" ` ,
} ,
} ,
Discount : & InputField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Discount (%)" , locale ) ,
Type : "number" ,
Required : true ,
Attributes : [ ] template . HTMLAttr {
2023-04-27 22:22:28 +00:00
triggerRecompute ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
` min="0" ` ,
` max="100" ` ,
} ,
} ,
Tax : & SelectField {
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Taxes" , locale ) ,
Multiple : true ,
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
Options : taxOptions ,
2023-04-27 22:22:28 +00:00
Attributes : [ ] template . HTMLAttr {
triggerRecompute ,
} ,
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
} ,
}
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
form . Rename ( )
2023-02-21 12:57:40 +00:00
return form
}
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
func ( form * invoiceProductForm ) Rename ( ) {
suffix := "." + strconv . Itoa ( form . Index )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
form . InvoiceProductId . Name = "product.invoice_product_id" + suffix
2023-02-21 12:57:40 +00:00
form . ProductId . Name = "product.id" + suffix
form . Name . Name = "product.name" + suffix
form . Description . Name = "product.description" + suffix
form . Price . Name = "product.price" + suffix
form . Quantity . Name = "product.quantity" + suffix
form . Discount . Name = "product.discount" + suffix
form . Tax . Name = "product.tax" + suffix
2023-02-11 21:16:48 +00:00
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
func ( form * invoiceProductForm ) Parse ( r * http . Request ) error {
if err := r . ParseForm ( ) ; err != nil {
return err
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
form . InvoiceProductId . FillValue ( r )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
form . ProductId . FillValue ( r )
form . Name . FillValue ( r )
form . Description . FillValue ( r )
form . Price . FillValue ( r )
form . Quantity . FillValue ( r )
form . Discount . FillValue ( r )
form . Tax . FillValue ( r )
return nil
}
func ( form * invoiceProductForm ) Validate ( ) bool {
validator := newFormValidator ( )
2023-04-24 18:40:10 +00:00
if form . InvoiceProductId . Val != "" {
validator . CheckValidInteger ( form . ProductId , 1 , math . MaxInt32 , gettext ( "Product ID must be a number greater than zero." , form . locale ) )
}
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
validator . CheckRequiredInput ( form . Name , gettext ( "Name can not be empty." , form . locale ) )
if validator . CheckRequiredInput ( form . Price , gettext ( "Price can not be empty." , form . locale ) ) {
validator . CheckValidDecimal ( form . Price , form . company . MinCents ( ) , math . MaxFloat64 , gettext ( "Price must be a number greater than zero." , form . locale ) )
}
if validator . CheckRequiredInput ( form . Quantity , gettext ( "Quantity can not be empty." , form . locale ) ) {
2023-02-13 09:32:26 +00:00
validator . CheckValidInteger ( form . Quantity , 1 , math . MaxInt32 , gettext ( "Quantity must be a number greater than zero." , form . locale ) )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
}
if validator . CheckRequiredInput ( form . Discount , gettext ( "Discount can not be empty." , form . locale ) ) {
validator . CheckValidInteger ( form . Discount , 0 , 100 , gettext ( "Discount must be a percentage between 0 and 100." , form . locale ) )
}
validator . CheckValidSelectOption ( form . Tax , gettext ( "Selected tax is not valid." , form . locale ) )
2023-03-01 10:55:26 +00:00
validator . CheckAtMostOneOfEachGroup ( form . Tax , gettext ( "You can only select a tax of each class." , form . locale ) )
2023-02-12 20:06:48 +00:00
return validator . AllOK ( )
}
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
2023-04-24 18:40:10 +00:00
func ( form * invoiceProductForm ) Update ( ) {
validator := newFormValidator ( )
if ! validator . CheckValidDecimal ( form . Price , form . company . MinCents ( ) , math . MaxFloat64 , "" ) {
form . Price . Val = "0.0"
form . Price . Errors = nil
}
if ! validator . CheckValidInteger ( form . Quantity , 0 , math . MaxInt32 , "" ) {
form . Quantity . Val = "1"
form . Quantity . Errors = nil
}
if ! validator . CheckValidInteger ( form . Discount , 0 , 100 , "" ) {
form . Discount . Val = "0"
form . Discount . Errors = nil
}
}
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
func ( form * invoiceProductForm ) MustFillFromDatabase ( ctx context . Context , conn * Conn , slug string ) bool {
2023-04-26 11:50:02 +00:00
return ! notFoundErrorOrPanic ( conn . QueryRow ( ctx , selectProductBySlug , [ ] string { slug } ) . Scan (
form . InvoiceProductId ,
2023-04-24 00:00:38 +00:00
form . ProductId ,
form . Name ,
form . Description ,
form . Price ,
form . Quantity ,
form . Discount ,
form . Tax ) )
}
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
func HandleUpdateInvoice ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
locale := getLocale ( r )
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
conn := getConn ( r )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
form := newInvoiceForm ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale , company )
if err := form . Parse ( r ) ; err != nil {
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
return
}
if err := verifyCsrfTokenValid ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusForbidden )
return
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
if r . FormValue ( "quick" ) == "status" {
slug := conn . MustGetText ( r . Context ( ) , "" , "update invoice set invoice_status = $1 where slug = $2 returning slug" , form . InvoiceStatus , params [ 0 ] . Value )
if slug == "" {
http . NotFound ( w , r )
}
2023-04-06 10:20:40 +00:00
htmxRedirect ( w , r , companyURI ( mustGetCompany ( r ) , "/invoices" ) )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
} else {
slug := params [ 0 ] . Value
if ! form . Validate ( ) {
2023-04-19 17:18:29 +00:00
if ! IsHTMxRequest ( r ) {
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusUnprocessableEntity )
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
mustRenderEditInvoiceForm ( w , r , slug , form )
return
}
Add tags for contacts too
With Oriol we agreed that contacts should have tags, too, and that the
“tag pool”, as it were, should be shared with the one for invoices (and
all future tags we might add).
I added the contact_tag relation and tag_contact function, just like
with invoices, and then realized that the SQL queries that Go had to
execute were becoming “complex” enough: i had to get not only the slug,
but the contact id to call tag_contact, and all inside a transaction.
Therefore, i opted to create the add_contact and edit_contact functions,
that mirror those for invoice and products, so now each “major” section
has these functions. They also simplified a bit the handling of the
VATIN and phone numbers, because it is now encapsuled inside the
PL/pgSQL function and Go does not know how to assemble the parts.
2023-03-26 00:32:53 +00:00
slug = conn . MustGetText ( r . Context ( ) , "" , "select edit_invoice($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7)" , slug , form . InvoiceStatus , form . Customer , form . Notes , form . PaymentMethod , form . Tags , EditedInvoiceProductArray ( form . Products ) )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
if slug == "" {
http . NotFound ( w , r )
return
}
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
htmxRedirect ( w , r , companyURI ( company , "/invoices/" + slug ) )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
}
2023-04-06 10:20:40 +00:00
}
func htmxRedirect ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , uri string ) {
if IsHTMxRequest ( r ) {
w . Header ( ) . Set ( HxLocation , MustMarshalHTMxLocation ( & HTMxLocation {
Path : uri ,
Target : "main" ,
} ) )
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusNoContent )
} else {
http . Redirect ( w , r , uri , http . StatusSeeOther )
}
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
}
func ServeEditInvoice ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
slug := params [ 0 ] . Value
locale := getLocale ( r )
form := newInvoiceForm ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale , company )
if ! form . MustFillFromDatabase ( r . Context ( ) , conn , slug ) {
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
http . NotFound ( w , r )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
return
}
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusOK )
mustRenderEditInvoiceForm ( w , r , slug , form )
}
type editInvoicePage struct {
* newInvoicePage
Slug string
Number string
}
func newEditInvoicePage ( slug string , form * invoiceForm , r * http . Request ) * editInvoicePage {
return & editInvoicePage {
newNewInvoicePage ( form , r ) ,
slug ,
Remove the number field from new invoice form
Initially, this field was meant to be left almost always blank, except
for when we deleted invoiced and had to “replace” its number with a new
invoice; using the automatic numbering in this cas would not “fill in”
the missing number in the sequence.
However, we decide to not allow removing invoicer not edit their
numbers, therefore, if everything goes as planned, there should not be
any gap in the sequence, and that field is rendered useless.
Oriol suggested making it a read-only field, both for new and edit
forms, but i do not think it makes sense to have a field if you can not
edit it at all, specially in the new invoice dialog, where it would
always be blank. In the edit form we already show the number in the
title and breadcrumbs, thus no need for the read-only field as
reference.
I still keep a Number member to the form struct, but is now a string
(kind of “a read-only field”, in a way) and just to be written in the
title or breadcrumbs. I did not like the idea of adding a new SQL
query just for that value.
2023-04-01 13:57:56 +00:00
form . Number ,
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
}
}
func mustRenderEditInvoiceForm ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , slug string , form * invoiceForm ) {
page := newEditInvoicePage ( slug , form , r )
2023-04-25 13:28:55 +00:00
mustRenderMainTemplate ( w , r , "invoices/edit.gohtml" , page )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
}
func HandleEditInvoiceAction ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
slug := params [ 0 ] . Value
actionUri := fmt . Sprintf ( "/invoices/%s/edit" , slug )
handleInvoiceAction ( w , r , actionUri , func ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , form * invoiceForm ) {
mustRenderEditInvoiceForm ( w , r , slug , form )
} )
}
type renderFormFunc func ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , form * invoiceForm )
func handleInvoiceAction ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , action string , renderForm renderFormFunc ) {
locale := getLocale ( r )
conn := getConn ( r )
company := mustGetCompany ( r )
form := newInvoiceForm ( r . Context ( ) , conn , locale , company )
if err := form . Parse ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
return
}
if err := verifyCsrfTokenValid ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusForbidden )
return
}
switch r . Form . Get ( "action" ) {
case "update" :
form . Update ( )
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusOK )
renderForm ( w , r , form )
case "select-products" :
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusOK )
mustRenderNewInvoiceProductsForm ( w , r , action , form )
case "add-products" :
2023-04-26 11:50:02 +00:00
form . AddProducts ( r . Context ( ) , conn , r . Form [ "slug" ] )
2023-03-13 14:00:35 +00:00
w . WriteHeader ( http . StatusOK )
renderForm ( w , r , form )
default :
http . Error ( w , gettext ( "Invalid action" , locale ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
2023-03-07 10:52:09 +00:00
}
}
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
type tagsForm struct {
2023-05-08 10:58:54 +00:00
Action string
Slug string
Tags * TagsField
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
}
2023-05-08 10:58:54 +00:00
func newTagsForm ( uri string , slug string , locale * Locale ) * tagsForm {
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
return & tagsForm {
2023-05-08 10:58:54 +00:00
Action : uri ,
Slug : slug ,
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
Tags : & TagsField {
Name : "tags-" + slug ,
Label : pgettext ( "input" , "Tags" , locale ) ,
} ,
}
}
func ( form * tagsForm ) Parse ( r * http . Request ) error {
if err := r . ParseForm ( ) ; err != nil {
return err
}
form . Tags . FillValue ( r )
return nil
}
func ServeEditInvoiceTags ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
conn := getConn ( r )
locale := getLocale ( r )
2023-05-08 10:58:54 +00:00
company := getCompany ( r )
slug := params [ 0 ] . Value
form := newTagsForm ( companyURI ( company , "/invoices/" + slug + "/tags" ) , slug , locale )
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
if notFoundErrorOrPanic ( conn . QueryRow ( r . Context ( ) , ` select array_to_string(tags, ',') from invoice where slug = $1 ` , form . Slug ) . Scan ( & form . Tags ) ) {
http . NotFound ( w , r )
return
}
mustRenderStandaloneTemplate ( w , r , "tags/edit.gohtml" , form )
}
func HandleUpdateInvoiceTags ( w http . ResponseWriter , r * http . Request , params httprouter . Params ) {
locale := getLocale ( r )
conn := getConn ( r )
2023-05-08 10:58:54 +00:00
company := getCompany ( r )
slug := params [ 0 ] . Value
form := newTagsForm ( companyURI ( company , "/invoices/" + slug + "/tags/edit" ) , slug , locale )
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
if err := form . Parse ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusBadRequest )
return
}
if err := verifyCsrfTokenValid ( r ) ; err != nil {
http . Error ( w , err . Error ( ) , http . StatusForbidden )
return
}
2023-05-08 10:58:54 +00:00
if conn . MustGetText ( r . Context ( ) , "" , "update invoice set tags = $1 where slug = $2 returning slug" , form . Tags , form . Slug ) == "" {
Allow editing invoice tags inline from the index table
I use the same pattern as HTMx’s “Click to Edit” example[0], except that
my edit form is triggered by submit and by focus out of the tags input.
I could not, however, use the standard focus out event because it would
also trigger when removing a tag with the mouse, as for a moment the
remove button has the focus and the search input dispatches a bubbling
focusout. I had to resort to a custom event for that, but i am not
happy with it.
The autofocus attribute seems to do nothing in this case, so i need to
manually change the focus to the new input with JavaScript. However,
this means that i can not use the same input ID for all the forms
because getElementById would always return the first in document order,
changing the focus to that same element and automatically submit the
form due to focus out. That’s why in this form i append the invoice’s
slug to the input’s ID.
Finally, this is the first time i am using an HTMx-only solution and i
needed a way to return back just the HTML for the <td>, without <title>,
breadcrumbs, or <dialog>. In principle, the template would be the
“layout”, but then i would need to modify everything to check whether
the template file is empty, or something to that effect, so instead i
created a “standalone” template for these cases.
[0]: https://htmx.org/examples/click-to-edit/
2023-04-11 08:46:27 +00:00
http . NotFound ( w , r )
}
mustRenderStandaloneTemplate ( w , r , "tags/view.gohtml" , form )
}