jordi fita mas
c453715ee1
Initially, this field was meant to be left almost always blank, except for when we deleted invoiced and had to “replace” its number with a new invoice; using the automatic numbering in this cas would not “fill in” the missing number in the sequence. However, we decide to not allow removing invoicer not edit their numbers, therefore, if everything goes as planned, there should not be any gap in the sequence, and that field is rendered useless. Oriol suggested making it a read-only field, both for new and edit forms, but i do not think it makes sense to have a field if you can not edit it at all, specially in the new invoice dialog, where it would always be blank. In the edit form we already show the number in the title and breadcrumbs, thus no need for the read-only field as reference. I still keep a Number member to the form struct, but is now a string (kind of “a read-only field”, in a way) and just to be written in the title or breadcrumbs. I did not like the idea of adding a new SQL query just for that value.