camper/po/es.po

849 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add the skeleton of the web application It does nothing more than to server a single page that does nothing interesting. This time i do not use a router. Instead, i am trying out a technique i have seen in an article[0] that i have tried in other, smaller, projects and seems to work surprisingly well: it just “cuts off” the URI path by path, passing the request from handler to handler until it finds its way to a handler that actually serves the request. That helps to loosen the coupling between the application and lower handlers, and makes dependencies explicit, because i need to pass the locale, company, etc. down instead of storing them in contexts. Let’s see if i do not regret it on a later date. I also made a lot more packages that in Numerus. In Numerus i actually only have the single pkg package, and it works, kind of, but i notice how i name my methods to avoid clashing instead of using packages for that. That is, instead of pkg.NewApp i now have app.New. Initially i thought that Locale should be inside app, but then there was a circular dependency between app and template. That is why i created a separate package, but now i am wondering if template should be inside app too, but then i would have app.MustRenderTemplate instead of template.MustRender. The CSS is the most bare-bones file i could write because i am focusing in markup right now; Oriol will fill in the file once the application is working. [0]: https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2017-06-18-how-not-to-use-an-http-router/
2023-07-22 22:11:00 +00:00
# Spanish translations for camper package
# Traducciones al español para el paquete camper.
# Copyright (C) 2023 THE camper'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the camper package.
# jordi fita mas <jordi@tandem.blog>, 2023.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: camper\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: jordi@tandem.blog\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-09-22 02:03+0200\n"
Add the skeleton of the web application It does nothing more than to server a single page that does nothing interesting. This time i do not use a router. Instead, i am trying out a technique i have seen in an article[0] that i have tried in other, smaller, projects and seems to work surprisingly well: it just “cuts off” the URI path by path, passing the request from handler to handler until it finds its way to a handler that actually serves the request. That helps to loosen the coupling between the application and lower handlers, and makes dependencies explicit, because i need to pass the locale, company, etc. down instead of storing them in contexts. Let’s see if i do not regret it on a later date. I also made a lot more packages that in Numerus. In Numerus i actually only have the single pkg package, and it works, kind of, but i notice how i name my methods to avoid clashing instead of using packages for that. That is, instead of pkg.NewApp i now have app.New. Initially i thought that Locale should be inside app, but then there was a circular dependency between app and template. That is why i created a separate package, but now i am wondering if template should be inside app too, but then i would have app.MustRenderTemplate instead of template.MustRender. The CSS is the most bare-bones file i could write because i am focusing in markup right now; Oriol will fill in the file once the application is working. [0]: https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2017-06-18-how-not-to-use-an-http-router/
2023-07-22 22:11:00 +00:00
"PO-Revision-Date: 2023-07-22 23:46+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: jordi fita mas <jordi@tandem.blog>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <es@tp.org.es>\n"
"Language: es\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n"
#: web/templates/public/services.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/public/services.gohtml:15
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Services"
msgstr "Servicios"
#: web/templates/public/services.gohtml:18
msgid "The campsite offers many different services."
msgstr "El camping dispone de varios servicios."
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:6 web/templates/public/layout.gohtml:28
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Home"
msgstr "Inicio"
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:17
msgid "The pleasure of camping in the middle of nature…"
msgstr "El placer de acampar en plena naturaleza…"
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:18
msgctxt "link"
msgid "Booking"
msgstr "Reservar"
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:31
msgid "Our services"
msgstr "Nuestros servicios"
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:34
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:10
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Surroundings"
msgstr "El entorno"
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:37
msgid "Located in <strong>Alta Garrotxa</strong>, between the <strong>Pyrenees</strong> and the <strong>Costa Brava</strong>."
msgstr "Situados en la <strong>Alta Garrotxa</strong>, entre los <strong>Pirineos</strong> y la <strong>Costa Brava</strong>."
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:38
msgid "Nearby there are the <strong>gorges of Sadernes</strong>, <strong>volcanoes</strong>, <strong>La Fageda den Jordà</strong>, the Jewish quarter of <strong>Besalú</strong>, the basaltic cliff of <strong>Castellfollit de la Roca</strong>… much to see and much to do."
msgstr "Cerca tenéis los <strong>piletones de Sadernes</strong>, <strong>volcanes</strong>, <strong>La Fageda den Jordà</strong>, la judería de <strong>Besalú</strong>, el riscal basáltico de <strong>Castellfollit de la Roca</strong>… mucho por ver y mucho por hacer."
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:39
msgid "Less than an hour from <strong>Girona</strong>, one from <strong>La Bisbal dEmpordà</strong>, and two from <strong>Barcelona</strong>."
msgstr "A menos de una hora de <strong>Girona</strong>, a una de <strong>La Bisbal dEmpordà</strong> y a dos de <strong>Barcelona</strong>."
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:40
msgid "Discover the surroundings"
msgstr "Descubre el entorno"
Make home page’s carousel manageable via the database I debated with myself whether to create the home_carousel relation or rather if it would be better to have a single carousel relation for all pages. However, i thought that it would be actually harder to maintain a single relation because i would need an additional column to tell one carrousel from another, and what would that column be? An enum? A foreign key to another relation? home_carousel carries no such issues. I was starting to duplicate logic all over the packages, such as the way to encode media paths or “localization” (l10n) input fields. Therefore, i refactorized them. In the case of media path, i added a function that accepts rows of media, because always need the same columns from the row, and it was yet another repetition if i needed to pass them all the time. Plus, these kind of functions can be called as `table.function`, that make them look like columns from the table; if PostgreSQL implemented virtual generated columns, i would have used that instead. I am not sure whether that media_path function can be immutable. An immutable function is “guaranteed to return the same results given the same arguments forever”, which would be true if the inputs where the hash and the original_filename columns, instead of the whole rows, but i left it as static because i did not know whether PostgreSQL interprets the “same row but with different values” as a different input. That is, whether PostgreSQL’s concept of row is the actual tuple or the space that has a rowid, irrespective of contents; in the latter case, the function can not be immutable. Just to be in the safe side, i left it stable. The home page was starting to grow a bit too much inside the app package, new that it has its own admin handler, and moved it all to a separate package.
2023-09-14 23:05:38 +00:00
#: web/templates/public/home.gohtml:54
msgid "Come and enjoy!"
msgstr "¡Ven a disfrutar!"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:13
msgctxt "title"
msgid "What to Do Outside the Campsite?"
msgstr "¿Qué hacer desde el camping?"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:15
msgid "Campsite Montagut is an ideal starting point for quiet outings, climbing, swimming in the river and gorges, volcanoes, the Fageda den Jordà, cycle tours for all ages…."
msgstr "El Camping Montagut es ideal como punto de salida de excursiones tranquilas, escalada, bañarse en el río y piletones, volcanes, la Fageda den Jordà, salidas en bicicleta para todos los niveles…."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:22
msgid "Get to the Costa Brava and enjoy the beaches, the gastronomy or go kayaking…."
msgstr "Llegar hasta la Costa Brava y disfrutar de las playas, la gastronomía o ir en kayak…."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:31
msgid "You will also find museums in Olot, Figures, Girona."
msgstr "También encontraréis museos en Olot, Figueres, Girona."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:32
msgid "As well as music festivals, dance, theater…."
msgstr "Como festivales de música, danza, teatro…."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:38
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Once at the Campsite, We Can Inform You about What Activities are Available"
msgstr "Una vez en el camping, os podemos informar de qué actividades hacer"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:41
msgid "Cycle routes"
msgstr "Rutas en bicicleta"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:42
msgid "There are many bicycle rental companies in Olot."
msgstr "A Olot podéis encontrar empresas de alquiler de bicicletas."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:46
msgid "Routes"
msgstr "Rutas"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:47
msgid "Routes of all kinds, climbing, mountain passes, for all levels."
msgstr "Rutas de todo tipo, escalada, puertos de montaña, para todos los niveles."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:51
msgid "Family outing"
msgstr "Excusiones familiares"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:52
msgid "Many outing possibilities, for all ages."
msgstr "Múltiples excursiones para todas las edades."
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:56
msgid "Kayak"
msgstr "Kayak"
#: web/templates/public/surroundings.gohtml:57
msgid "There are several points where you can go by kayak, from sections of the Ter river as well as on the coast…."
msgstr "Hay diversos puntos dónde podéis ir en kayak, desde tramos del río Ter como también en la costa…."
#: web/templates/public/layout.gohtml:11 web/templates/public/layout.gohtml:23
#: web/templates/public/layout.gohtml:58
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
msgid "Campsite Montagut"
msgstr "Camping Montagut"
#: web/templates/public/layout.gohtml:21 web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:18
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
msgid "Skip to main content"
msgstr "Saltar al contenido principal"
#: web/templates/public/layout.gohtml:32
msgid "Singular Lodges"
msgstr "Alojamientos singulares"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:8
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:26
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Carousel Slide"
msgstr "Edición de la diapositiva del carrusel"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:10
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:28
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Carousel Slide"
msgstr "Nueva diapositiva del carrusel"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:38
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/l10n.gohtml:21
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Caption"
msgstr "Leyenda"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:48
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:71
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:67
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:65
#: web/templates/admin/media/form.gohtml:36
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Update"
msgstr "Actualizar"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/form.gohtml:50
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:73
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:69
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:67
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add"
msgstr "Añadir"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/l10n.gohtml:7
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/l10n.gohtml:15
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Translate Carousel Slide to %s"
msgstr "Traducción de la diapositiva de carrusel a %s"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/l10n.gohtml:22
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:22
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:34
msgid "Source:"
msgstr "Origen:"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/l10n.gohtml:24
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:24
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:37
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Translation:"
msgstr "Traducción"
#: web/templates/admin/carousel/l10n.gohtml:33
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:46
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Translate"
msgstr "Traducir"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:8
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:26
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Campsite"
msgstr "Edición del alojamientos"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:10
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:28
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Campsite"
msgstr "Nuevo alojamiento"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:38
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:20
msgctxt "campsite"
msgid "Active"
msgstr "Activo"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:47
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Campsite Type"
msgstr "Tipo de alojamiento"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:52
msgid "Select campsite type"
msgstr "Escoged un tipo de alojamiento"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/form.gohtml:61
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Label"
msgstr "Etiqueta"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:13
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:70
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Campsites"
msgstr "Alojamientos"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:12
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add Campsite"
msgstr "Añadir alojamiento"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:18
msgctxt "header"
msgid "Label"
msgstr "Etiqueta"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:19
msgctxt "header"
msgid "Type"
msgstr "Tipo"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:28
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:36
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:32
msgid "Yes"
msgstr "Sí"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:28
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:36
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:32
msgid "No"
msgstr "No"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/index.gohtml:34
msgid "No campsites added yet."
msgstr "No se ha añadido ningún alojamiento todavía."
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:8
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:26
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Campsite Type"
msgstr "Edición del tipo de alojamientos"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:10
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:28
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Campsite Type"
msgstr "Nuevo tipo de alojamiento"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:38
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:20
msgctxt "campsite type"
msgid "Active"
msgstr "Activo"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:47
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:21
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:47
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:26
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Name"
msgstr "Nombre"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/form.gohtml:58
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:33
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Description"
msgstr "Descripción"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:13
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:67
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Campsite Types"
msgstr "Tipos de alojamientos"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:12
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add Type"
msgstr "Añadir tipo"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:18
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:18
msgctxt "header"
msgid "Name"
msgstr "Nombre"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:19
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:20
Make home page’s carousel manageable via the database I debated with myself whether to create the home_carousel relation or rather if it would be better to have a single carousel relation for all pages. However, i thought that it would be actually harder to maintain a single relation because i would need an additional column to tell one carrousel from another, and what would that column be? An enum? A foreign key to another relation? home_carousel carries no such issues. I was starting to duplicate logic all over the packages, such as the way to encode media paths or “localization” (l10n) input fields. Therefore, i refactorized them. In the case of media path, i added a function that accepts rows of media, because always need the same columns from the row, and it was yet another repetition if i needed to pass them all the time. Plus, these kind of functions can be called as `table.function`, that make them look like columns from the table; if PostgreSQL implemented virtual generated columns, i would have used that instead. I am not sure whether that media_path function can be immutable. An immutable function is “guaranteed to return the same results given the same arguments forever”, which would be true if the inputs where the hash and the original_filename columns, instead of the whole rows, but i left it as static because i did not know whether PostgreSQL interprets the “same row but with different values” as a different input. That is, whether PostgreSQL’s concept of row is the actual tuple or the space that has a rowid, irrespective of contents; in the latter case, the function can not be immutable. Just to be in the safe side, i left it stable. The home page was starting to grow a bit too much inside the app package, new that it has its own admin handler, and moved it all to a separate package.
2023-09-14 23:05:38 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:20
msgctxt "campsite type"
msgid "Translations"
msgstr "Traducciones"
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/index.gohtml:42
msgid "No campsite types added yet."
msgstr "No se ha añadido ningún tipo de alojamiento todavía."
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:7
#: web/templates/admin/campsite/type/l10n.gohtml:15
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Translate Campsite Type to %s"
msgstr "Traducción de tipo de alojamiento a %s"
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:8
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:26
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Season"
msgstr "Edición de temporada"
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:10
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:28
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Season"
msgstr "Nueva temporada"
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:38
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:20
msgctxt "season"
msgid "Active"
msgstr "Activa"
#: web/templates/admin/season/form.gohtml:55
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Color"
msgstr "Color"
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:13
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:73
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Seasons"
msgstr "Temporadas"
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:12
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add Season"
msgstr "Añadir temporada"
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:19
msgctxt "header"
msgid "Color"
msgstr "Color"
#: web/templates/admin/season/index.gohtml:38
msgid "No seasons added yet."
msgstr "No se ha añadido ninguna temporada todavía."
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/dashboard.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/dashboard.gohtml:10 web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:49
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Dashboard"
msgstr "Panel"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/login.gohtml:6 web/templates/admin/login.gohtml:13
Add the skeleton of the web application It does nothing more than to server a single page that does nothing interesting. This time i do not use a router. Instead, i am trying out a technique i have seen in an article[0] that i have tried in other, smaller, projects and seems to work surprisingly well: it just “cuts off” the URI path by path, passing the request from handler to handler until it finds its way to a handler that actually serves the request. That helps to loosen the coupling between the application and lower handlers, and makes dependencies explicit, because i need to pass the locale, company, etc. down instead of storing them in contexts. Let’s see if i do not regret it on a later date. I also made a lot more packages that in Numerus. In Numerus i actually only have the single pkg package, and it works, kind of, but i notice how i name my methods to avoid clashing instead of using packages for that. That is, instead of pkg.NewApp i now have app.New. Initially i thought that Locale should be inside app, but then there was a circular dependency between app and template. That is why i created a separate package, but now i am wondering if template should be inside app too, but then i would have app.MustRenderTemplate instead of template.MustRender. The CSS is the most bare-bones file i could write because i am focusing in markup right now; Oriol will fill in the file once the application is working. [0]: https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2017-06-18-how-not-to-use-an-http-router/
2023-07-22 22:11:00 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Login"
msgstr "Entrada"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/login.gohtml:22 web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:35
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:51
Add the skeleton of the web application It does nothing more than to server a single page that does nothing interesting. This time i do not use a router. Instead, i am trying out a technique i have seen in an article[0] that i have tried in other, smaller, projects and seems to work surprisingly well: it just “cuts off” the URI path by path, passing the request from handler to handler until it finds its way to a handler that actually serves the request. That helps to loosen the coupling between the application and lower handlers, and makes dependencies explicit, because i need to pass the locale, company, etc. down instead of storing them in contexts. Let’s see if i do not regret it on a later date. I also made a lot more packages that in Numerus. In Numerus i actually only have the single pkg package, and it works, kind of, but i notice how i name my methods to avoid clashing instead of using packages for that. That is, instead of pkg.NewApp i now have app.New. Initially i thought that Locale should be inside app, but then there was a circular dependency between app and template. That is why i created a separate package, but now i am wondering if template should be inside app too, but then i would have app.MustRenderTemplate instead of template.MustRender. The CSS is the most bare-bones file i could write because i am focusing in markup right now; Oriol will fill in the file once the application is working. [0]: https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2017-06-18-how-not-to-use-an-http-router/
2023-07-22 22:11:00 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Email"
msgstr "Correo-e"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/login.gohtml:31 web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:46
Add the skeleton of the web application It does nothing more than to server a single page that does nothing interesting. This time i do not use a router. Instead, i am trying out a technique i have seen in an article[0] that i have tried in other, smaller, projects and seems to work surprisingly well: it just “cuts off” the URI path by path, passing the request from handler to handler until it finds its way to a handler that actually serves the request. That helps to loosen the coupling between the application and lower handlers, and makes dependencies explicit, because i need to pass the locale, company, etc. down instead of storing them in contexts. Let’s see if i do not regret it on a later date. I also made a lot more packages that in Numerus. In Numerus i actually only have the single pkg package, and it works, kind of, but i notice how i name my methods to avoid clashing instead of using packages for that. That is, instead of pkg.NewApp i now have app.New. Initially i thought that Locale should be inside app, but then there was a circular dependency between app and template. That is why i created a separate package, but now i am wondering if template should be inside app too, but then i would have app.MustRenderTemplate instead of template.MustRender. The CSS is the most bare-bones file i could write because i am focusing in markup right now; Oriol will fill in the file once the application is working. [0]: https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2017-06-18-how-not-to-use-an-http-router/
2023-07-22 22:11:00 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Password"
msgstr "Contraseña"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/login.gohtml:40
Add the skeleton of the web application It does nothing more than to server a single page that does nothing interesting. This time i do not use a router. Instead, i am trying out a technique i have seen in an article[0] that i have tried in other, smaller, projects and seems to work surprisingly well: it just “cuts off” the URI path by path, passing the request from handler to handler until it finds its way to a handler that actually serves the request. That helps to loosen the coupling between the application and lower handlers, and makes dependencies explicit, because i need to pass the locale, company, etc. down instead of storing them in contexts. Let’s see if i do not regret it on a later date. I also made a lot more packages that in Numerus. In Numerus i actually only have the single pkg package, and it works, kind of, but i notice how i name my methods to avoid clashing instead of using packages for that. That is, instead of pkg.NewApp i now have app.New. Initially i thought that Locale should be inside app, but then there was a circular dependency between app and template. That is why i created a separate package, but now i am wondering if template should be inside app too, but then i would have app.MustRenderTemplate instead of template.MustRender. The CSS is the most bare-bones file i could write because i am focusing in markup right now; Oriol will fill in the file once the application is working. [0]: https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2017-06-18-how-not-to-use-an-http-router/
2023-07-22 22:11:00 +00:00
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Login"
msgstr "Entrar"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:79
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Services Page"
msgstr "Página de servicios"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:12
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:12
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Carousel"
msgstr "Carrusel"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:13
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:13
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add slide"
msgstr "Añadir diapositiva"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:18
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:18
msgctxt "header"
msgid "Image"
msgstr "Imagen"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:19
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:19
msgctxt "header"
msgid "Caption"
msgstr "Leyenda"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:21
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:21
msgctxt "campsite type"
msgid "Actions"
msgstr "Acciones"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:40
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:40
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Delete"
msgstr "Borrar"
#: web/templates/admin/services/index.gohtml:48
#: web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:48
msgid "No slides added yet."
msgstr "No se ha añadido ninguna diapositiva todavía."
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:6 web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:12
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:29
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Profile"
msgstr "Perfil"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:17
msgctxt "inut"
msgid "Profile Image"
msgstr "Imagen del perfil"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:43
msgctxt "legend"
msgid "Change password"
msgstr "Cambio de contraseña"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:55
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Password Confirmation"
msgstr "Confirmación de la contraseña"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:65
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Language"
msgstr "Idioma"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/profile.gohtml:75
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:145
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Save changes"
msgstr "Guardar los cambios"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:13
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:64
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Tax Details"
msgstr "Configuración fiscal"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:18
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:59
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Business Name"
msgstr "Nombre de empresa"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:27
msgctxt "input"
msgid "VAT Number"
msgstr "NIF"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:35
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Trade Name"
msgstr "Nombre comercial"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:43
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Phone"
msgstr "Teléfono"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:67
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Address"
msgstr "Dirección"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:75
msgctxt "input"
msgid "City"
msgstr "Población"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:83
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Province"
msgstr "Provincia"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:91
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Postal Code"
msgstr "Código postal"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:99
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Country"
msgstr "País"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:109
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Currency"
msgstr "Moneda"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:119
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Default Language"
msgstr "Idioma por defecto"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:129
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Invoice Number Format"
msgstr "Formato de número de factura"
#: web/templates/admin/taxDetails.gohtml:137
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Legal Disclaimer"
msgstr "Nota legal"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:25
msgctxt "title"
msgid "User Menu"
msgstr "Menú de usuario"
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:33
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Company Settings"
msgstr "Parámetros de la empresa"
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:38
Add the logout button Conceptually, to logout we have to “delete the session”, thus the best HTTP verb would be `DELETE`. However, there is no way to send a `DELETE` request with a regular HTML form, and it seems that never will be[0]. I could use a POST, optionally with a “method override” technique, but i was planing to use HTMx anyway, so this was as good an opportunity to include it as any. In this application i am not concerned with people not having JavaScript enabled, because it is for a customer that has a known environment, and we do not have much time anyway. Therefore, i opted to forgo progressive enhancement in cases like this: if `DELETE` is needed, use `hx-delete`. Unfortunately, i can not use a <form> with a hidden <input> for the CSRF token, because `DELETE` requests do not have body and the value should be added as query parameters, like a form with GET method, but HTMx does the incorrect thing here: sends the values in the request’s body. That’s why i have to use a custom header and the `hx-header` directive to include the CSRF token. Then, by default HTMx targets the triggered element for swap with the response from the server, but after a logout i want to redirect the user to the login form again. I could set the hx-target to button to replace the whole body, or tell the client to redirect to the new location. I actually do not know which one is “better”. Maybe the hx-target is best because then everything is handled by the client, but in the case of logout, since it is possible that i might want to load scripts only for logged-in users in the future, i opted for the full page reload. However, HTMx does not want to reload a page that return HTTP 401, hence i had to include the GET method to /login in order to return the login form with a response of HTTP 200, which also helps when reloading in the browser after a failed login attempt. I am not worried with the HTTP 401 when attempting to load a page as guest, because this request most probably comes from the browser, not HTMx, and it will show the login form as intended—even though it is not compliant, since it does not return the WWW-Authenticate header, but this is the best i can do given that no cookie-based authentication method has been accepted[1]. [0]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10671#c16 [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00.html
2023-07-26 11:49:47 +00:00
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Logout"
msgstr "Salir"
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:76 web/templates/admin/home/index.gohtml:6
Make home page’s carousel manageable via the database I debated with myself whether to create the home_carousel relation or rather if it would be better to have a single carousel relation for all pages. However, i thought that it would be actually harder to maintain a single relation because i would need an additional column to tell one carrousel from another, and what would that column be? An enum? A foreign key to another relation? home_carousel carries no such issues. I was starting to duplicate logic all over the packages, such as the way to encode media paths or “localization” (l10n) input fields. Therefore, i refactorized them. In the case of media path, i added a function that accepts rows of media, because always need the same columns from the row, and it was yet another repetition if i needed to pass them all the time. Plus, these kind of functions can be called as `table.function`, that make them look like columns from the table; if PostgreSQL implemented virtual generated columns, i would have used that instead. I am not sure whether that media_path function can be immutable. An immutable function is “guaranteed to return the same results given the same arguments forever”, which would be true if the inputs where the hash and the original_filename columns, instead of the whole rows, but i left it as static because i did not know whether PostgreSQL interprets the “same row but with different values” as a different input. That is, whether PostgreSQL’s concept of row is the actual tuple or the space that has a rowid, irrespective of contents; in the latter case, the function can not be immutable. Just to be in the safe side, i left it stable. The home page was starting to grow a bit too much inside the app package, new that it has its own admin handler, and moved it all to a separate package.
2023-09-14 23:05:38 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Home Page"
msgstr "Página de inicio"
Make home page’s carousel manageable via the database I debated with myself whether to create the home_carousel relation or rather if it would be better to have a single carousel relation for all pages. However, i thought that it would be actually harder to maintain a single relation because i would need an additional column to tell one carrousel from another, and what would that column be? An enum? A foreign key to another relation? home_carousel carries no such issues. I was starting to duplicate logic all over the packages, such as the way to encode media paths or “localization” (l10n) input fields. Therefore, i refactorized them. In the case of media path, i added a function that accepts rows of media, because always need the same columns from the row, and it was yet another repetition if i needed to pass them all the time. Plus, these kind of functions can be called as `table.function`, that make them look like columns from the table; if PostgreSQL implemented virtual generated columns, i would have used that instead. I am not sure whether that media_path function can be immutable. An immutable function is “guaranteed to return the same results given the same arguments forever”, which would be true if the inputs where the hash and the original_filename columns, instead of the whole rows, but i left it as static because i did not know whether PostgreSQL interprets the “same row but with different values” as a different input. That is, whether PostgreSQL’s concept of row is the actual tuple or the space that has a rowid, irrespective of contents; in the latter case, the function can not be immutable. Just to be in the safe side, i left it stable. The home page was starting to grow a bit too much inside the app package, new that it has its own admin handler, and moved it all to a separate package.
2023-09-14 23:05:38 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/layout.gohtml:82
#: web/templates/admin/media/index.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/media/index.gohtml:12
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Media"
msgstr "Medios"
Add the upload form to the media picker It makes easier to upload new images from the place where we need it, instead of having to go to the media section each time. It was a little messy, this one. First of all, I realized that POSTint to /admin/media/picker to get the new media field was wrong: i was not asking the server to “accept an entity”, but only requesting a new HTML value, just like a GET to /admin/media/upload requests the form to upload a new media, thus here i should do the same, except i needed the query parameters to change the field, which is fine—it is actually a different resource, thus a different URL. Then, i thought that i could not POST the upload to /admin/media, because i returned a different HTML —the media field—, so i reused the recently unused POST to /admin/media/picker to upload that file and return the HTML for the field. It was wrong, because i was not requesting the server to put the file as a subordinate of /admin/media/picker, only /admin/media, but i did not come up with any other solution. Since i had two different upload functions now, i created uploadForm’s Handle method to refactorize the duplicated logic to a single place. Unfortunately, i did not work as i expected because uploadForm’s and mediaPicker’s MustRender methods are different, and mediaPicker has to embed uploadForm to render the form in the picker. That made me change Handle’s output to a boolean and error in order for the HTTP handler function know when to render the form with the error messages with the proper MustRender handler. However, I saw the opportunity of reusing that Handler method for editMedia, that was doing mostly the same job, but had to call a different Validate than uploadForm’s, because editMedia does not require the uploaded file. That’s when i realized that i could use an interface and that this interface could be reused not only within media but throughout the application, and added HandleMultipart in form. Had to create a different interface for multipart forms because they need different parameters in Parse that non-multipart form, when i add that interface, hence had to also change Parse to ParseForm to account for the difference in signature; not a big deal. After all that, i realized that i **could** POST to /admin/media in both cases, because i always return “an HTML entity”, it just happens that for the media section it is empty with a redirect, and for the picker is the field. That made the whole Handle method a bit redundant, but i left it nevertheless, as i find it slightly easier to read the uploadMedia function now.
2023-09-21 23:40:22 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:8
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Media Picker"
msgstr "Selector de medio"
Add the upload form to the media picker It makes easier to upload new images from the place where we need it, instead of having to go to the media section each time. It was a little messy, this one. First of all, I realized that POSTint to /admin/media/picker to get the new media field was wrong: i was not asking the server to “accept an entity”, but only requesting a new HTML value, just like a GET to /admin/media/upload requests the form to upload a new media, thus here i should do the same, except i needed the query parameters to change the field, which is fine—it is actually a different resource, thus a different URL. Then, i thought that i could not POST the upload to /admin/media, because i returned a different HTML —the media field—, so i reused the recently unused POST to /admin/media/picker to upload that file and return the HTML for the field. It was wrong, because i was not requesting the server to put the file as a subordinate of /admin/media/picker, only /admin/media, but i did not come up with any other solution. Since i had two different upload functions now, i created uploadForm’s Handle method to refactorize the duplicated logic to a single place. Unfortunately, i did not work as i expected because uploadForm’s and mediaPicker’s MustRender methods are different, and mediaPicker has to embed uploadForm to render the form in the picker. That made me change Handle’s output to a boolean and error in order for the HTTP handler function know when to render the form with the error messages with the proper MustRender handler. However, I saw the opportunity of reusing that Handler method for editMedia, that was doing mostly the same job, but had to call a different Validate than uploadForm’s, because editMedia does not require the uploaded file. That’s when i realized that i could use an interface and that this interface could be reused not only within media but throughout the application, and added HandleMultipart in form. Had to create a different interface for multipart forms because they need different parameters in Parse that non-multipart form, when i add that interface, hence had to also change Parse to ParseForm to account for the difference in signature; not a big deal. After all that, i realized that i **could** POST to /admin/media in both cases, because i always return “an HTML entity”, it just happens that for the media section it is empty with a redirect, and for the picker is the field. That made the whole Handle method a bit redundant, but i left it nevertheless, as i find it slightly easier to read the uploadMedia function now.
2023-09-21 23:40:22 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Upload New Media"
msgstr "Subida de un nuevo medio"
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:22
#: web/templates/admin/media/upload.gohtml:18
msgctxt "input"
msgid "File"
msgstr "Archivo"
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:26
Add the upload form to the media picker It makes easier to upload new images from the place where we need it, instead of having to go to the media section each time. It was a little messy, this one. First of all, I realized that POSTint to /admin/media/picker to get the new media field was wrong: i was not asking the server to “accept an entity”, but only requesting a new HTML value, just like a GET to /admin/media/upload requests the form to upload a new media, thus here i should do the same, except i needed the query parameters to change the field, which is fine—it is actually a different resource, thus a different URL. Then, i thought that i could not POST the upload to /admin/media, because i returned a different HTML —the media field—, so i reused the recently unused POST to /admin/media/picker to upload that file and return the HTML for the field. It was wrong, because i was not requesting the server to put the file as a subordinate of /admin/media/picker, only /admin/media, but i did not come up with any other solution. Since i had two different upload functions now, i created uploadForm’s Handle method to refactorize the duplicated logic to a single place. Unfortunately, i did not work as i expected because uploadForm’s and mediaPicker’s MustRender methods are different, and mediaPicker has to embed uploadForm to render the form in the picker. That made me change Handle’s output to a boolean and error in order for the HTTP handler function know when to render the form with the error messages with the proper MustRender handler. However, I saw the opportunity of reusing that Handler method for editMedia, that was doing mostly the same job, but had to call a different Validate than uploadForm’s, because editMedia does not require the uploaded file. That’s when i realized that i could use an interface and that this interface could be reused not only within media but throughout the application, and added HandleMultipart in form. Had to create a different interface for multipart forms because they need different parameters in Parse that non-multipart form, when i add that interface, hence had to also change Parse to ParseForm to account for the difference in signature; not a big deal. After all that, i realized that i **could** POST to /admin/media in both cases, because i always return “an HTML entity”, it just happens that for the media section it is empty with a redirect, and for the picker is the field. That made the whole Handle method a bit redundant, but i left it nevertheless, as i find it slightly easier to read the uploadMedia function now.
2023-09-21 23:40:22 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/media/form.gohtml:23
#: web/templates/admin/media/upload.gohtml:22
msgid "Maximum upload file size: %s"
msgstr "Tamaño máximo del archivos a subir: %s"
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:31
#: web/templates/admin/media/upload.gohtml:27
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Upload"
msgstr "Subir"
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:44
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Choose Existing Media"
msgstr "Elección de un medio existente"
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:55
#: web/templates/admin/media/index.gohtml:21
msgid "No media uploaded yet."
msgstr "No se ha subido ningún medio todavía."
Add the upload form to the media picker It makes easier to upload new images from the place where we need it, instead of having to go to the media section each time. It was a little messy, this one. First of all, I realized that POSTint to /admin/media/picker to get the new media field was wrong: i was not asking the server to “accept an entity”, but only requesting a new HTML value, just like a GET to /admin/media/upload requests the form to upload a new media, thus here i should do the same, except i needed the query parameters to change the field, which is fine—it is actually a different resource, thus a different URL. Then, i thought that i could not POST the upload to /admin/media, because i returned a different HTML —the media field—, so i reused the recently unused POST to /admin/media/picker to upload that file and return the HTML for the field. It was wrong, because i was not requesting the server to put the file as a subordinate of /admin/media/picker, only /admin/media, but i did not come up with any other solution. Since i had two different upload functions now, i created uploadForm’s Handle method to refactorize the duplicated logic to a single place. Unfortunately, i did not work as i expected because uploadForm’s and mediaPicker’s MustRender methods are different, and mediaPicker has to embed uploadForm to render the form in the picker. That made me change Handle’s output to a boolean and error in order for the HTTP handler function know when to render the form with the error messages with the proper MustRender handler. However, I saw the opportunity of reusing that Handler method for editMedia, that was doing mostly the same job, but had to call a different Validate than uploadForm’s, because editMedia does not require the uploaded file. That’s when i realized that i could use an interface and that this interface could be reused not only within media but throughout the application, and added HandleMultipart in form. Had to create a different interface for multipart forms because they need different parameters in Parse that non-multipart form, when i add that interface, hence had to also change Parse to ParseForm to account for the difference in signature; not a big deal. After all that, i realized that i **could** POST to /admin/media in both cases, because i always return “an HTML entity”, it just happens that for the media section it is empty with a redirect, and for the picker is the field. That made the whole Handle method a bit redundant, but i left it nevertheless, as i find it slightly easier to read the uploadMedia function now.
2023-09-21 23:40:22 +00:00
#: web/templates/admin/media/picker.gohtml:58
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Cancel"
msgstr "Cancelar"
#: web/templates/admin/media/form.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/media/form.gohtml:13
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Media"
msgstr "Edición de medio"
#: web/templates/admin/media/form.gohtml:19
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Updated file"
msgstr "Archivo actualizado"
#: web/templates/admin/media/form.gohtml:28
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Filename"
msgstr "Nombre de archivo"
#: web/templates/admin/media/index.gohtml:13
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Upload media"
msgstr "Subir medio"
#: web/templates/admin/media/upload.gohtml:6
#: web/templates/admin/media/upload.gohtml:13
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Upload Media"
msgstr "Subida de medio"
#: pkg/carousel/admin.go:233 pkg/campsite/types/admin.go:236
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Cover image"
msgstr "Imagen de portada"
#: pkg/carousel/admin.go:234
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Set cover image"
msgstr "Establecer la imagen de portada"
#: pkg/carousel/admin.go:286
msgid "Slide image can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la imagen de la diapositiva en blanco."
#: pkg/carousel/admin.go:287 pkg/campsite/types/admin.go:276
msgid "Cover image must be a image media."
msgstr "La imagen de portada tiene que ser un medio de imagen."
#: pkg/app/login.go:56 pkg/app/user.go:246 pkg/company/admin.go:203
msgid "Email can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el correo-e en blanco."
#: pkg/app/login.go:57 pkg/app/user.go:247 pkg/company/admin.go:204
msgid "This email is not valid. It should be like name@domain.com."
msgstr "Este correo-e no es válido. Tiene que ser parecido a nombre@dominio.com."
Add the logout button Conceptually, to logout we have to “delete the session”, thus the best HTTP verb would be `DELETE`. However, there is no way to send a `DELETE` request with a regular HTML form, and it seems that never will be[0]. I could use a POST, optionally with a “method override” technique, but i was planing to use HTMx anyway, so this was as good an opportunity to include it as any. In this application i am not concerned with people not having JavaScript enabled, because it is for a customer that has a known environment, and we do not have much time anyway. Therefore, i opted to forgo progressive enhancement in cases like this: if `DELETE` is needed, use `hx-delete`. Unfortunately, i can not use a <form> with a hidden <input> for the CSRF token, because `DELETE` requests do not have body and the value should be added as query parameters, like a form with GET method, but HTMx does the incorrect thing here: sends the values in the request’s body. That’s why i have to use a custom header and the `hx-header` directive to include the CSRF token. Then, by default HTMx targets the triggered element for swap with the response from the server, but after a logout i want to redirect the user to the login form again. I could set the hx-target to button to replace the whole body, or tell the client to redirect to the new location. I actually do not know which one is “better”. Maybe the hx-target is best because then everything is handled by the client, but in the case of logout, since it is possible that i might want to load scripts only for logged-in users in the future, i opted for the full page reload. However, HTMx does not want to reload a page that return HTTP 401, hence i had to include the GET method to /login in order to return the login form with a response of HTTP 200, which also helps when reloading in the browser after a failed login attempt. I am not worried with the HTTP 401 when attempting to load a page as guest, because this request most probably comes from the browser, not HTMx, and it will show the login form as intended—even though it is not compliant, since it does not return the WWW-Authenticate header, but this is the best i can do given that no cookie-based authentication method has been accepted[1]. [0]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10671#c16 [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00.html
2023-07-26 11:49:47 +00:00
#: pkg/app/login.go:59
msgid "Password can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la contraseña en blanco."
#: pkg/app/login.go:86
msgid "Invalid user or password."
msgstr "Usuario o contraseña incorrectos."
Add the logout button Conceptually, to logout we have to “delete the session”, thus the best HTTP verb would be `DELETE`. However, there is no way to send a `DELETE` request with a regular HTML form, and it seems that never will be[0]. I could use a POST, optionally with a “method override” technique, but i was planing to use HTMx anyway, so this was as good an opportunity to include it as any. In this application i am not concerned with people not having JavaScript enabled, because it is for a customer that has a known environment, and we do not have much time anyway. Therefore, i opted to forgo progressive enhancement in cases like this: if `DELETE` is needed, use `hx-delete`. Unfortunately, i can not use a <form> with a hidden <input> for the CSRF token, because `DELETE` requests do not have body and the value should be added as query parameters, like a form with GET method, but HTMx does the incorrect thing here: sends the values in the request’s body. That’s why i have to use a custom header and the `hx-header` directive to include the CSRF token. Then, by default HTMx targets the triggered element for swap with the response from the server, but after a logout i want to redirect the user to the login form again. I could set the hx-target to button to replace the whole body, or tell the client to redirect to the new location. I actually do not know which one is “better”. Maybe the hx-target is best because then everything is handled by the client, but in the case of logout, since it is possible that i might want to load scripts only for logged-in users in the future, i opted for the full page reload. However, HTMx does not want to reload a page that return HTTP 401, hence i had to include the GET method to /login in order to return the login form with a response of HTTP 200, which also helps when reloading in the browser after a failed login attempt. I am not worried with the HTTP 401 when attempting to load a page as guest, because this request most probably comes from the browser, not HTMx, and it will show the login form as intended—even though it is not compliant, since it does not return the WWW-Authenticate header, but this is the best i can do given that no cookie-based authentication method has been accepted[1]. [0]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10671#c16 [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00.html
2023-07-26 11:49:47 +00:00
#: pkg/app/user.go:197
msgctxt "language option"
msgid "Automatic"
msgstr "Automático"
#: pkg/app/user.go:249 pkg/campsite/types/l10n.go:82
#: pkg/campsite/types/admin.go:274 pkg/season/admin.go:203
msgid "Name can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre en blanco."
#: pkg/app/user.go:250
msgid "Confirmation does not match password."
msgstr "La confirmación no se corresponde con la contraseña."
#: pkg/app/user.go:251 pkg/company/admin.go:218
msgid "Selected language is not valid."
msgstr "El idioma escogido no es válido."
#: pkg/app/user.go:253
msgid "File must be a valid PNG or JPEG image."
msgstr "El archivo tiene que ser una imagen PNG o JPEG válida."
#: pkg/app/admin.go:53
Split templates and handlers into admin and public I need to check that the user is an employee (or admin) in administration handlers, but i do not want to do it for each handler, because i am bound to forget it. Thus, i added the /admin sub-path for these resources. The public-facing web is the rest of the resources outside /admin, but for now there is only home, to test whether it works as expected or not. The public-facing web can not relay on the user’s language settings, as the guest user has no way to set that. I would be happy to just use the Accept-Language header for that, but apparently Google does not use that header[0], and they give four alternatives: a country-specific domain, a subdomain with a generic top-level domain (gTLD), subdirectories with a gTLD, or URL parameters (e.g., site.com?loc=de). Of the four, Google does not recommend URL parameters, and the customer is already using subdirectories with the current site, therefor that’s what i have chosen. Google also tells me that it is a very good idea to have links between localized version of the same resources, either with <link> elements, Link HTTP response headers, or a sitemap file[1]; they are all equivalent in the eyes of Google. I have choosen the Link response headers way, because for that i can simply “augment” ResponseHeader to automatically add these headers when the response status is 2xx, otherwise i would need to pass down the original URL path until it reaches the template. Even though Camper is supposed to be a “generic”, multi-company application, i think i will stick to the easiest route and write the templates for just the “first” customer. [0]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions
2023-08-05 01:42:37 +00:00
msgid "Access forbidden"
msgstr "Acceso prohibido"
#: pkg/campsite/types/admin.go:237
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Set campsite type cover"
msgstr "Establecer la portada del tipo de alojamiento"
#: pkg/campsite/types/admin.go:275
msgid "Cover image can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la imagen de portada en blanco."
#: pkg/campsite/admin.go:218
msgid "Selected campsite type is not valid."
msgstr "El tipo de alojamiento escogido no es válido."
#: pkg/campsite/admin.go:219
msgid "Label can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la etiqueta en blanco."
#: pkg/season/admin.go:204
msgid "Color can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el color en blanco."
#: pkg/season/admin.go:205
msgid "This color is not valid. It must be like #123abc."
msgstr "Este color no es válido. Tiene que ser parecido a #123abc."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:186
msgid "Selected country is not valid."
msgstr "El país escogido no es válido."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:190
msgid "Business name can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre de empresa en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:191
msgid "Business name must have at least two letters."
msgstr "El nombre de la empresa tiene que tener como mínimo dos letras."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:193
msgid "VAT number can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el NIF en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:194
msgid "This VAT number is not valid."
msgstr "Este NIF no es válido."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:198
msgid "Phone can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el teléfono en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:199
msgid "This phone number is not valid."
msgstr "Este teléfono no es válido."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:207
msgid "This web address is not valid. It should be like https://domain.com/."
msgstr "Esta dirección web no es válida. Tiene que ser parecido a https://dominio.com/."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:209
msgid "Address can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la dirección en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:210
msgid "City can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la población en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:211
msgid "Province can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la provincia en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:212
msgid "Postal code can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el código postal en blanco."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:213
msgid "This postal code is not valid."
msgstr "Este código postal no es válido."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:217
msgid "Selected currency is not valid."
msgstr "La moneda escogida no es válida."
#: pkg/company/admin.go:219
msgid "Invoice number format can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el formato de número de factura en blanco."
#: pkg/auth/user.go:40
Add the logout button Conceptually, to logout we have to “delete the session”, thus the best HTTP verb would be `DELETE`. However, there is no way to send a `DELETE` request with a regular HTML form, and it seems that never will be[0]. I could use a POST, optionally with a “method override” technique, but i was planing to use HTMx anyway, so this was as good an opportunity to include it as any. In this application i am not concerned with people not having JavaScript enabled, because it is for a customer that has a known environment, and we do not have much time anyway. Therefore, i opted to forgo progressive enhancement in cases like this: if `DELETE` is needed, use `hx-delete`. Unfortunately, i can not use a <form> with a hidden <input> for the CSRF token, because `DELETE` requests do not have body and the value should be added as query parameters, like a form with GET method, but HTMx does the incorrect thing here: sends the values in the request’s body. That’s why i have to use a custom header and the `hx-header` directive to include the CSRF token. Then, by default HTMx targets the triggered element for swap with the response from the server, but after a logout i want to redirect the user to the login form again. I could set the hx-target to button to replace the whole body, or tell the client to redirect to the new location. I actually do not know which one is “better”. Maybe the hx-target is best because then everything is handled by the client, but in the case of logout, since it is possible that i might want to load scripts only for logged-in users in the future, i opted for the full page reload. However, HTMx does not want to reload a page that return HTTP 401, hence i had to include the GET method to /login in order to return the login form with a response of HTTP 200, which also helps when reloading in the browser after a failed login attempt. I am not worried with the HTTP 401 when attempting to load a page as guest, because this request most probably comes from the browser, not HTMx, and it will show the login form as intended—even though it is not compliant, since it does not return the WWW-Authenticate header, but this is the best i can do given that no cookie-based authentication method has been accepted[1]. [0]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10671#c16 [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00.html
2023-07-26 11:49:47 +00:00
msgid "Cross-site request forgery detected."
msgstr "Se ha detectado un intento de falsificación de petición en sitios cruzados."
#: pkg/media/admin.go:265
msgid "Uploaded file can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el archivo del medio en blanco."
#: pkg/media/admin.go:324
msgid "Filename can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre del archivo en blanco."
#~ msgid "Surroundings"
#~ msgstr "Entorno"
Make home page’s carousel manageable via the database I debated with myself whether to create the home_carousel relation or rather if it would be better to have a single carousel relation for all pages. However, i thought that it would be actually harder to maintain a single relation because i would need an additional column to tell one carrousel from another, and what would that column be? An enum? A foreign key to another relation? home_carousel carries no such issues. I was starting to duplicate logic all over the packages, such as the way to encode media paths or “localization” (l10n) input fields. Therefore, i refactorized them. In the case of media path, i added a function that accepts rows of media, because always need the same columns from the row, and it was yet another repetition if i needed to pass them all the time. Plus, these kind of functions can be called as `table.function`, that make them look like columns from the table; if PostgreSQL implemented virtual generated columns, i would have used that instead. I am not sure whether that media_path function can be immutable. An immutable function is “guaranteed to return the same results given the same arguments forever”, which would be true if the inputs where the hash and the original_filename columns, instead of the whole rows, but i left it as static because i did not know whether PostgreSQL interprets the “same row but with different values” as a different input. That is, whether PostgreSQL’s concept of row is the actual tuple or the space that has a rowid, irrespective of contents; in the latter case, the function can not be immutable. Just to be in the safe side, i left it stable. The home page was starting to grow a bit too much inside the app package, new that it has its own admin handler, and moved it all to a separate package.
2023-09-14 23:05:38 +00:00
#~ msgid "Legend"
#~ msgstr "Leyenda"
#~ msgid "Environment"
#~ msgstr "Entorno"
#~ msgctxt "input"
#~ msgid "Title"
#~ msgstr "Título"
#~ msgctxt "input"
#~ msgid "Content"
#~ msgstr "Contenido"
#~ msgctxt "title"
#~ msgid "Pages"
#~ msgstr "Páginas"
#~ msgctxt "action"
#~ msgid "Add Page"
#~ msgstr "Añadir página"
#~ msgctxt "header"
#~ msgid "Title"
#~ msgstr "Título"