numerus/po/es.po

1388 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add Catalan and Spanish translation with gotext[3] I had to choose between [1], [2], and [3]. As far as i could find, [1] is not easy to work with templates[4] and at the moment is not maintained[5]. Both [2] and [3] use the same approach to be used from within templates: you have to define a FuncMap with template functions that call the message catalog. Also, both libraries seems to be reasonably maintained, and have packages in Debian’s repository. However, [2] repeats the same mistakes that POSIX did with its catalogs—using identifiers that are not the strings in the source language—, however this time the catalogs are written in JSON or YAML! This, somehow, makes things worse…. [3], the one i settled with, is fine and decently maintained. There are some surprising things, such as to be able to use directly the PO file, and that it has higher priority over the corresponding MO, or that the order of parameters is reversed in respect to gettext. However, it uses a saner format, and is a lot easier to work with than [3]. The problem, of course, is that xgettext does not know how to find translatable strings inside the template. [3] includes a CLI tool similar to xgettext, but is not a drop-in replacement[6] and does not process templates. The proper way to handle this would be to add a parser to xgettext, but for now i found out that if i surround the call to the translation functions from within the template with parentheses, i can trick xgettext into believing it is parsing Scheme code, and extracts the strings successfully—at least, for what i have tried. Had to add the keyword for pgettext, because Schemed does not have it, but at least i can do that with command line parameters. For now i left only Spanish and Catalan as the two available languages, even though the source text is written in English, because that way i can make sure i do not leave strings untranslated. [1]: https://golang.org/x/text [2]: https://github.com/nicksnyder/go-i18n [3]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext [4]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39954 [5]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12750 [6]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext/issues/38
2023-01-18 18:07:42 +00:00
# Spanish translations for numerus package.
# Copyright (C) 2023 jordi fita mas
# This file is distributed under the same license as the numerus package.
# jordi fita mas <jordi@tandem.blog>, 2023.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: numerus\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: jordi@tandem.blog\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-07-16 20:50+0200\n"
Add Catalan and Spanish translation with gotext[3] I had to choose between [1], [2], and [3]. As far as i could find, [1] is not easy to work with templates[4] and at the moment is not maintained[5]. Both [2] and [3] use the same approach to be used from within templates: you have to define a FuncMap with template functions that call the message catalog. Also, both libraries seems to be reasonably maintained, and have packages in Debian’s repository. However, [2] repeats the same mistakes that POSIX did with its catalogs—using identifiers that are not the strings in the source language—, however this time the catalogs are written in JSON or YAML! This, somehow, makes things worse…. [3], the one i settled with, is fine and decently maintained. There are some surprising things, such as to be able to use directly the PO file, and that it has higher priority over the corresponding MO, or that the order of parameters is reversed in respect to gettext. However, it uses a saner format, and is a lot easier to work with than [3]. The problem, of course, is that xgettext does not know how to find translatable strings inside the template. [3] includes a CLI tool similar to xgettext, but is not a drop-in replacement[6] and does not process templates. The proper way to handle this would be to add a parser to xgettext, but for now i found out that if i surround the call to the translation functions from within the template with parentheses, i can trick xgettext into believing it is parsing Scheme code, and extracts the strings successfully—at least, for what i have tried. Had to add the keyword for pgettext, because Schemed does not have it, but at least i can do that with command line parameters. For now i left only Spanish and Catalan as the two available languages, even though the source text is written in English, because that way i can make sure i do not leave strings untranslated. [1]: https://golang.org/x/text [2]: https://github.com/nicksnyder/go-i18n [3]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext [4]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39954 [5]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12750 [6]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext/issues/38
2023-01-18 18:07:42 +00:00
"PO-Revision-Date: 2023-01-18 17:45+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: jordi fita mas <jordi@tandem.blog>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <es@tp.org.es>\n"
"Language: es\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:2
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:23
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Add Products to Invoice"
msgstr "Añadir productos a la factura"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:9 web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:9
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:9 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:9
#: web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:9 web/template/home.gohtml:2
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:9 web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:9
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:9 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:9
#: web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:9 web/template/contacts/new.gohtml:9
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:9 web/template/contacts/edit.gohtml:10
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: web/template/contacts/import.gohtml:8 web/template/profile.gohtml:9
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:10 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:10
#: web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:10 web/template/tax-details.gohtml:9
#: web/template/products/new.gohtml:9 web/template/products/index.gohtml:9
#: web/template/products/edit.gohtml:10
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Home"
msgstr "Inicio"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:10 web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:10
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:2 web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:10
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:10 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:10
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Invoices"
msgstr "Facturas"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:12 web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:2
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:11 web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Invoice"
msgstr "Nueva factura"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:48
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:48
msgctxt "product"
msgid "All"
msgstr "Todos"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:49
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:49 web/template/products/index.gohtml:45
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Name"
msgstr "Nombre"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:50
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:66 web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:50
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:73 web/template/products/index.gohtml:47
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Price"
msgstr "Precio"
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:64
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:64 web/template/products/index.gohtml:88
msgid "No products added yet."
msgstr "No hay productos."
#: web/template/invoices/products.gohtml:72 web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:88
#: web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:89 web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:72
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:88 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:89
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add products"
msgstr "Añadir productos"
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:30 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:30
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:30 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:30
2023-05-28 22:02:55 +00:00
msgid "Product “%s” removed"
msgstr "Se ha borrado el producto «%s»"
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:34 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:34
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:34 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:34
2023-05-28 22:02:55 +00:00
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Undo"
msgstr "Deshacer"
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:64 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:71
#: web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:65 web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:64
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:78 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:65
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Subtotal"
msgstr "Subtotal"
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:74 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:75
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:115 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:75
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:74 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:82
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:122 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:75
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:47 web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:49
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Total"
msgstr "Total"
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:92 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:93
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:92 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:93
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:57 web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:59
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Update"
msgstr "Actualizar"
#: web/template/invoices/new.gohtml:95 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:96
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:95 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:96
#: web/template/contacts/new.gohtml:49 web/template/contacts/edit.gohtml:53
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:60 web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:62
#: web/template/products/new.gohtml:30 web/template/products/edit.gohtml:36
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Save"
msgstr "Guardad"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:19
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Download invoices"
msgstr "Descargar facturas"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:21
msgctxt "action"
msgid "New invoice"
msgstr "Nueva factura"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:45 web/template/dashboard.gohtml:23
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:45 web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:38
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:39 web/template/products/index.gohtml:36
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Filter"
msgstr "Filtrar"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:48 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:48
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:41 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:42
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:39
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Reset"
msgstr "Restablecer"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:54
msgctxt "invoice"
msgid "All"
msgstr "Todas"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:55 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:38
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:55 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:37
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Date"
msgstr "Fecha"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:56
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Invoice Num."
msgstr "N.º factura"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:57 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:57
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Customer"
msgstr "Cliente"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:58 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:58
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:51
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Status"
msgstr "Estado"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:59 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:59
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:50 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:52
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:46
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Tags"
msgstr "Etiquetes"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:60 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:60
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:53
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Amount"
msgstr "Importe"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:61 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:61
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:54
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Download"
msgstr "Descargar"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:62 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:62
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:51 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:55
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:48
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Actions"
msgstr "Acciones"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:69
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Select invoice %v"
msgstr "Seleccionar factura %v"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:110
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Download invoice %s"
msgstr "Descargar factura %s"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:118
msgid "Actions for invoice %s"
msgstr "Acciones para la factura %s"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:126 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:19
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:125 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:22
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:82 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:117
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:78
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Edit"
msgstr "Editar"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:134 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:16
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:133 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:19
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Duplicate"
msgstr "Duplicar"
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:144
msgid "No invoices added yet."
msgstr "No hay facturas."
#: web/template/invoices/index.gohtml:151 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:158
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:134
msgid "Total"
msgstr "Total"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:2 web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:37
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Invoice %s"
msgstr "Factura %s"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:22
Convert invoices to PDF with WeasyPrint Although it is possible to just print the invoice from the browser, many people will not even try an assume that they can not create a PDF for the invoice. I thought of using Groff or TeX to create the PDF, but it would mean maintaining two templates in two different systems (HTML and whatever i would use), and would probably look very different, because i do not know Groff or TeX that well. I wish there was a way to tell the browser to print to PDF, and it can be done, but only with the Chrome Protocol to a server-side running Chrome instance. This works, but i would need a Chrome running as a daemon. I also wrote a Qt application that uses QWebEngine to print the PDF, much like wkhtmltopdf, but with support for more recent HTML and CSS standards. Unfortunately, Qt 6.4’s embedded Chromium does not follow break-page-inside as well as WeasyPrint does. To use WeasyPrint, at first i wanted to reach the same URL as the user, passing the cookie to WeasyPrint so that i can access the same invoice as the user, something that can be done with wkhtmltopdf, but WeasyPrint does not have such option. I did it with a custom Python script, but then i need to package and install that script, that is not that much work, but using the Debian-provided script is even less work, and less likely to drift when WeasyPrint changes API. Also, it is unnecessary to do a network round-trip from Go to Python back to Go, because i can already write the invoice HTML as is to WeasyPrint’s stdin.
2023-02-26 16:26:09 +00:00
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Download invoice"
msgstr "Descargar factura"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:25
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Download invoice attachment"
msgstr "Descargar adjunto de factura"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:65 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:72
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Concept"
msgstr "Concepto"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:68 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:75
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Discount"
msgstr "Descuento"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:70 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:77
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Units"
msgstr "Unidades"
#: web/template/invoices/view.gohtml:105 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:112
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Tax Base"
msgstr "Base imponible"
#: web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:2 web/template/invoices/edit.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Invoice “%s”"
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgstr "Edición de la factura «%s»"
#: web/template/home.gohtml:9
msgid "If you want to sign in, just head to %sthe login page%s and enter your credentials in the form."
msgstr "Si quieres acceder a tu usuario solo tienes que ir a %sla página de entrada% y anotar tus credenciales a su sitio."
#: web/template/home.gohtml:12
msgid "manager"
msgstr "gestor"
#: web/template/home.gohtml:16
msgid "Tool to simplify management for small business and freelancers"
msgstr "Herramienta para simplificar la gestión de autónomos y pequeñas empresas."
#: web/template/home.gohtml:19
msgid "Reduce management time, take control of your balance."
msgstr "Reduce el tiempo de gestión, ten controlados tus números."
#: web/template/home.gohtml:20
msgid "application"
msgstr "aplicación"
#: web/template/form.gohtml:36
msgctxt "input"
msgid "(Max. %s)"
msgstr "(Máx. %s)"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: web/template/form.gohtml:200
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Filters"
msgstr "Filtrar"
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:3
Add Catalan and Spanish translation with gotext[3] I had to choose between [1], [2], and [3]. As far as i could find, [1] is not easy to work with templates[4] and at the moment is not maintained[5]. Both [2] and [3] use the same approach to be used from within templates: you have to define a FuncMap with template functions that call the message catalog. Also, both libraries seems to be reasonably maintained, and have packages in Debian’s repository. However, [2] repeats the same mistakes that POSIX did with its catalogs—using identifiers that are not the strings in the source language—, however this time the catalogs are written in JSON or YAML! This, somehow, makes things worse…. [3], the one i settled with, is fine and decently maintained. There are some surprising things, such as to be able to use directly the PO file, and that it has higher priority over the corresponding MO, or that the order of parameters is reversed in respect to gettext. However, it uses a saner format, and is a lot easier to work with than [3]. The problem, of course, is that xgettext does not know how to find translatable strings inside the template. [3] includes a CLI tool similar to xgettext, but is not a drop-in replacement[6] and does not process templates. The proper way to handle this would be to add a parser to xgettext, but for now i found out that if i surround the call to the translation functions from within the template with parentheses, i can trick xgettext into believing it is parsing Scheme code, and extracts the strings successfully—at least, for what i have tried. Had to add the keyword for pgettext, because Schemed does not have it, but at least i can do that with command line parameters. For now i left only Spanish and Catalan as the two available languages, even though the source text is written in English, because that way i can make sure i do not leave strings untranslated. [1]: https://golang.org/x/text [2]: https://github.com/nicksnyder/go-i18n [3]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext [4]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39954 [5]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12750 [6]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext/issues/38
2023-01-18 18:07:42 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Dashboard"
msgstr "Panel"
Add Catalan and Spanish translation with gotext[3] I had to choose between [1], [2], and [3]. As far as i could find, [1] is not easy to work with templates[4] and at the moment is not maintained[5]. Both [2] and [3] use the same approach to be used from within templates: you have to define a FuncMap with template functions that call the message catalog. Also, both libraries seems to be reasonably maintained, and have packages in Debian’s repository. However, [2] repeats the same mistakes that POSIX did with its catalogs—using identifiers that are not the strings in the source language—, however this time the catalogs are written in JSON or YAML! This, somehow, makes things worse…. [3], the one i settled with, is fine and decently maintained. There are some surprising things, such as to be able to use directly the PO file, and that it has higher priority over the corresponding MO, or that the order of parameters is reversed in respect to gettext. However, it uses a saner format, and is a lot easier to work with than [3]. The problem, of course, is that xgettext does not know how to find translatable strings inside the template. [3] includes a CLI tool similar to xgettext, but is not a drop-in replacement[6] and does not process templates. The proper way to handle this would be to add a parser to xgettext, but for now i found out that if i surround the call to the translation functions from within the template with parentheses, i can trick xgettext into believing it is parsing Scheme code, and extracts the strings successfully—at least, for what i have tried. Had to add the keyword for pgettext, because Schemed does not have it, but at least i can do that with command line parameters. For now i left only Spanish and Catalan as the two available languages, even though the source text is written in English, because that way i can make sure i do not leave strings untranslated. [1]: https://golang.org/x/text [2]: https://github.com/nicksnyder/go-i18n [3]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext [4]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39954 [5]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12750 [6]: https://github.com/leonelquinteros/gotext/issues/38
2023-01-18 18:07:42 +00:00
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:29
msgctxt "term"
msgid "Sales"
msgstr "Ventas"
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:33
msgctxt "term"
msgid "Income"
msgstr "Ingresos"
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:37
msgctxt "term"
msgid "Expenses"
msgstr "Gastos"
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:41
msgctxt "term"
msgid "VAT"
msgstr "IVA"
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:45
msgctxt "term"
msgid "IRPF"
msgstr "IRPF"
#: web/template/dashboard.gohtml:49
msgctxt "term"
msgid "Net Income"
msgstr "Ingresos netos"
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:2 web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:23
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Add Products to Quotation"
msgstr "Añadir productos al presupuesto"
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:10 web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:10
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:2 web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:10
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:10 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:10
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Quotations"
msgstr "Presupuestos"
#: web/template/quotes/products.gohtml:12 web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:2
#: web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:11 web/template/quotes/new.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Quotation"
msgstr "Nuevo presupuesto"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:19
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Download quotations"
msgstr "Descargar presupuestos"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:21
msgctxt "action"
msgid "New quotation"
msgstr "Nuevo presupuesto"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:54
msgctxt "quote"
msgid "All"
msgstr "Todos"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:56
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Quotation Num."
msgstr "N.º de presupuesto"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:69
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Select quotation %v"
msgstr "Seleccionar presupuesto %v"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:117
msgid "Actions for quote %s"
msgstr "Acciones para el presupuesto %s"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:141 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:16
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Create invoice"
msgstr "Crear factura"
#: web/template/quotes/index.gohtml:151
msgid "No quotations added yet."
msgstr "No hay presupuestos."
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:2 web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:36
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Quotation %s"
msgstr "Estado del presupuesto"
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:25
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Download quotation"
msgstr "Descargar presupuesto"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: web/template/quotes/view.gohtml:65
msgid "Terms and Conditions:"
msgstr "Condiciones de aceptación:"
#: web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:2 web/template/quotes/edit.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Quotation “%s”"
msgstr "Edición del presupuesto «%s»"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:23
msgctxt "menu"
msgid "Account"
msgstr "Cuenta"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:29
msgctxt "menu"
msgid "Tax Details"
msgstr "Configuración fiscal"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:37
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Logout"
msgstr "Salir"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:46
msgctxt "nav"
2023-01-31 12:29:56 +00:00
msgid "Dashboard"
msgstr "Panel"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:47
2023-01-31 12:29:56 +00:00
msgctxt "nav"
msgid "Quotations"
msgstr "Presupuestos"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:48
msgctxt "nav"
msgid "Invoices"
msgstr "Facturas"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:49
msgctxt "nav"
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "Expenses"
msgstr "Gastos"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:50
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "nav"
msgid "Products"
msgstr "Productos"
#: web/template/app.gohtml:51
msgctxt "nav"
msgid "Contacts"
msgstr "Contactos"
#: web/template/contacts/new.gohtml:2 web/template/contacts/new.gohtml:11
#: web/template/contacts/new.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Contact"
msgstr "Nuevo contacto"
#: web/template/contacts/new.gohtml:10 web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:2
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:10 web/template/contacts/edit.gohtml:11
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: web/template/contacts/import.gohtml:9
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Contacts"
msgstr "Contactos"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:15
msgctxt "action"
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
msgid "Import"
msgstr "Importar"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:17
msgctxt "action"
msgid "New contact"
msgstr "Nuevo contacto"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:47 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:48
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Contact"
msgstr "Contacto"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:48
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Email"
msgstr "Correo-e"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:49
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Phone"
msgstr "Teléfono"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:74
msgid "Actions for contact %s"
msgstr "Acciones para el contacto %s"
#: web/template/contacts/index.gohtml:92
msgid "No contacts added yet."
msgstr "No hay contactos."
#: web/template/contacts/edit.gohtml:3 web/template/contacts/edit.gohtml:20
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Contact “%s”"
msgstr "Edición del contacto «%s»"
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: web/template/contacts/import.gohtml:2 web/template/contacts/import.gohtml:10
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Import Contacts"
msgstr "Importación de contactos"
#: web/template/login.gohtml:2 web/template/login.gohtml:15
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Login"
msgstr "Entrada"
#: web/template/login.gohtml:19
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Login"
msgstr "Entrar"
2023-02-03 12:58:10 +00:00
#: web/template/profile.gohtml:2 web/template/profile.gohtml:10
#: web/template/profile.gohtml:18
msgctxt "title"
msgid "User Settings"
msgstr "Configuración usuario"
#: web/template/profile.gohtml:22
msgctxt "title"
msgid "User Access Data"
msgstr "Datos acceso usuario"
#: web/template/profile.gohtml:28
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Password Change"
msgstr "Cambio de contraseña"
#: web/template/profile.gohtml:35
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Language"
msgstr "Idioma"
#: web/template/profile.gohtml:39 web/template/tax-details.gohtml:175
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Save changes"
msgstr "Guardar cambios"
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:3 web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:12
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:20
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Expense"
msgstr "Nuevo gasto"
#: web/template/expenses/new.gohtml:11 web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:3
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:11 web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:11
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Expenses"
msgstr "Gastos"
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:16
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "action"
msgid "New expense"
msgstr "Nuevo gasto"
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:49
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Invoice Date"
msgstr "Fecha de factura"
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:50
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Invoice Number"
msgstr "Número de factura"
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:109
msgid "Actions for expense %s"
msgstr "Acciones para el gasto %s"
#: web/template/expenses/index.gohtml:127
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "No expenses added yet."
msgstr "No hay gastos."
#: web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:3 web/template/expenses/edit.gohtml:20
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Expense “%s”"
msgstr "Edición del gasto «%s»"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:2 web/template/tax-details.gohtml:10
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:18
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Tax Details"
msgstr "Configuración fiscal"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:35
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Currency"
msgstr "Moneda"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:41
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Invoicing and Quoting"
msgstr "Facturación y presupuestos"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:56
msgid "Are you sure?"
msgstr "¿Estáis seguro?"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:62
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Tax Name"
msgstr "Nombre impuesto"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:63
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Rate (%)"
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgstr "Porcentaje"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:64
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Class"
msgstr "Clase"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:88
msgid "No taxes added yet."
msgstr "No hay impuestos."
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:94 web/template/tax-details.gohtml:155
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Line"
msgstr "Nueva línea"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:108
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add new tax"
msgstr "Añadir nuevo impuesto"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:124
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Payment Method"
msgstr "Método de pago"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:125
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Instructions"
msgstr "Instrucciones"
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:149
msgid "No payment methods added yet."
msgstr "No hay métodos de pago."
#: web/template/tax-details.gohtml:167
msgctxt "action"
msgid "Add new payment method"
msgstr "Añadir nuevo método de pago"
#: web/template/products/new.gohtml:2 web/template/products/new.gohtml:11
#: web/template/products/new.gohtml:19
msgctxt "title"
msgid "New Product"
msgstr "Nuevo producto"
#: web/template/products/new.gohtml:10 web/template/products/index.gohtml:2
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:10 web/template/products/edit.gohtml:11
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Products"
msgstr "Productos"
#: web/template/products/search.gohtml:12
msgid "No products found."
msgstr "No se ha encontrado ningún producto."
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:15
msgctxt "action"
msgid "New product"
msgstr "Nuevo producto"
#: web/template/products/index.gohtml:70
msgid "Actions for product %s"
msgstr "Acciones para el producto %s"
#: web/template/products/edit.gohtml:3 web/template/products/edit.gohtml:20
msgctxt "title"
msgid "Edit Product “%s”"
msgstr "Edición del producto «%s»"
#: pkg/login.go:37 pkg/company.go:127 pkg/profile.go:40 pkg/contacts.go:267
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Email"
msgstr "Correo-e"
#: pkg/login.go:48 pkg/profile.go:49
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Password"
msgstr "Contraseña"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/login.go:70 pkg/company.go:283 pkg/profile.go:89
msgid "Email can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el correo-e en blanco."
#: pkg/login.go:71 pkg/company.go:284 pkg/profile.go:90 pkg/contacts.go:411
msgid "This value is not a valid email. It should be like name@domain.com."
msgstr "Este valor no es un correo-e válido. Tiene que ser parecido a nombre@dominio.es."
#: pkg/login.go:73
msgid "Password can not be empty."
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgstr "No podéis dejar la contraseña en blanco."
#: pkg/login.go:109
msgid "Invalid user or password."
msgstr "Nombre de usuario o contraseña inválido."
#: pkg/products.go:164 pkg/products.go:268 pkg/quote.go:887
#: pkg/invoices.go:1002 pkg/contacts.go:140 pkg/contacts.go:253
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Name"
msgstr "Nombre"
#: pkg/products.go:169 pkg/products.go:295 pkg/quote.go:174 pkg/quote.go:694
#: pkg/expenses.go:274 pkg/expenses.go:433 pkg/invoices.go:174
#: pkg/invoices.go:732 pkg/invoices.go:1304 pkg/contacts.go:145
#: pkg/contacts.go:353
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Tags"
msgstr "Etiquetes"
#: pkg/products.go:173 pkg/quote.go:178 pkg/expenses.go:443 pkg/invoices.go:178
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: pkg/contacts.go:149
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Tags Condition"
msgstr "Condición de las etiquetas"
#: pkg/products.go:177 pkg/quote.go:182 pkg/expenses.go:447 pkg/invoices.go:182
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: pkg/contacts.go:153
msgctxt "tag condition"
msgid "All"
msgstr "Todas"
#: pkg/products.go:178 pkg/expenses.go:448 pkg/invoices.go:183
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: pkg/contacts.go:154
msgid "Invoices must have all the specified labels."
msgstr "Las facturas deben tener todas las etiquetas."
#: pkg/products.go:182 pkg/quote.go:187 pkg/expenses.go:452 pkg/invoices.go:187
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: pkg/contacts.go:158
msgctxt "tag condition"
msgid "Any"
msgstr "Cualquiera"
#: pkg/products.go:183 pkg/expenses.go:453 pkg/invoices.go:188
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
#: pkg/contacts.go:159
msgid "Invoices must have at least one of the specified labels."
msgstr "Las facturas deben tener como mínimo una de las etiquetas."
#: pkg/products.go:274 pkg/quote.go:901 pkg/invoices.go:1016
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Description"
msgstr "Descripción"
#: pkg/products.go:279 pkg/quote.go:905 pkg/invoices.go:1020
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Price"
msgstr "Precio"
#: pkg/products.go:289 pkg/quote.go:934 pkg/expenses.go:242
#: pkg/invoices.go:1049
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Taxes"
msgstr "Impuestos"
#: pkg/products.go:314 pkg/quote.go:983 pkg/profile.go:92 pkg/invoices.go:1098
#: pkg/contacts.go:403
msgid "Name can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre en blanco."
#: pkg/products.go:315 pkg/quote.go:984 pkg/invoices.go:1099
msgid "Price can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el precio en blanco."
#: pkg/products.go:316 pkg/quote.go:985 pkg/invoices.go:1100
msgid "Price must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "El precio tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
#: pkg/products.go:318 pkg/quote.go:993 pkg/expenses.go:310
#: pkg/invoices.go:1108
msgid "Selected tax is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un impuesto que no es válido."
#: pkg/products.go:319 pkg/quote.go:994 pkg/expenses.go:311
#: pkg/invoices.go:1109
msgid "You can only select a tax of each class."
msgstr "Solo podéis escoger un impuesto de cada clase."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:113
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Trade name"
msgstr "Nombre comercial"
#: pkg/company.go:118 pkg/contacts.go:259
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Phone"
msgstr "Teléfono"
#: pkg/company.go:136 pkg/contacts.go:275
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Web"
msgstr "Web"
#: pkg/company.go:144 pkg/contacts.go:287
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Business name"
msgstr "Nombre y apellidos"
#: pkg/company.go:154 pkg/contacts.go:297
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "VAT number"
msgstr "DNI / NIF"
#: pkg/company.go:160 pkg/contacts.go:303
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Address"
msgstr "Dirección"
#: pkg/company.go:169 pkg/contacts.go:312
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "City"
msgstr "Población"
#: pkg/company.go:175 pkg/contacts.go:318
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Province"
msgstr "Provincia"
#: pkg/company.go:181 pkg/contacts.go:324
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Postal code"
msgstr "Código postal"
#: pkg/company.go:190 pkg/contacts.go:333
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Country"
msgstr "País"
#: pkg/company.go:200
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Currency"
msgstr "Moneda"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:207
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Invoice number format"
msgstr "Formato del número de factura"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:213
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Next invoice number"
msgstr "Siguiente número de factura"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:222
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Quotation number format"
msgstr "Formato del número de presupuesto"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:228
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Next quotation number"
msgstr "Siguiente número de presupuesto"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:237
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Legal disclaimer"
msgstr "Nota legal"
#: pkg/company.go:271 pkg/contacts.go:385
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Selected country is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un país que no es válido."
#: pkg/company.go:275 pkg/contacts.go:388
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Business name can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre y los apellidos en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:276 pkg/contacts.go:389
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Business name must have at least two letters."
msgstr "El nombre y los apellidos deben contener como mínimo dos letras."
#: pkg/company.go:277 pkg/contacts.go:391
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "VAT number can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el DNI o NIF en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:278 pkg/contacts.go:392
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "This value is not a valid VAT number."
msgstr "Este valor no es un DNI o NIF válido."
#: pkg/company.go:280
msgid "Phone can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el teléfono en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:281 pkg/contacts.go:408
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "This value is not a valid phone number."
msgstr "Este valor no es un teléfono válido."
#: pkg/company.go:287 pkg/contacts.go:414
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "This value is not a valid web address. It should be like https://domain.com/."
msgstr "Este valor no es una dirección web válida. Tiene que ser parecida a https://dominio.es/."
#: pkg/company.go:289 pkg/contacts.go:394
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Address can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la dirección en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:290 pkg/contacts.go:395
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "City can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la población en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:291 pkg/contacts.go:396
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Province can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la provincia en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:292 pkg/contacts.go:398
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Postal code can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el código postal en blanco."
#: pkg/company.go:293 pkg/contacts.go:399
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "This value is not a valid postal code."
msgstr "Este valor no es un código postal válido válido."
#: pkg/company.go:295
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgid "Selected currency is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido una moneda que no es válida."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:296
msgid "Invoice number format can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el formato del número de factura en blanco."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:297
msgid "Next invoice number must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "El siguiente número de factura tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:298
msgid "Quotation number format can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el formato del número de presupuesto en blanco."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:299
msgid "Next quotation number must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "El siguiente número de presupuesto tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:563
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Tax name"
msgstr "Nombre impuesto"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:569
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Tax Class"
msgstr "Clase de impuesto"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:572
msgid "Select a tax class"
msgstr "Escoged una clase de impuesto"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:576
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Rate (%)"
msgstr "Porcentaje"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:599
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgid "Tax name can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre del impuesto en blanco."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:600
msgid "Selected tax class is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido una clase impuesto que no es válida."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:601
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgid "Tax rate can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el porcentaje en blanco."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:602
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgid "Tax rate must be an integer between -99 and 99."
msgstr "El porcentaje tiene que estar entre -99 y 99."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:665
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Payment method name"
msgstr "Nombre del método de pago"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:671
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Instructions"
msgstr "Instrucciones"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:689
msgid "Payment method name can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el nombre del método de pago en blanco."
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
#: pkg/company.go:690
msgid "Payment instructions can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar las instrucciones de pago en blanco."
#: pkg/quote.go:147 pkg/quote.go:672 pkg/invoices.go:147 pkg/invoices.go:715
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Customer"
msgstr "Cliente"
#: pkg/quote.go:148 pkg/invoices.go:148
msgid "All customers"
msgstr "Todos los clientes"
#: pkg/quote.go:153 pkg/quote.go:666
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Quotation Status"
msgstr "Estado del presupuesto"
#: pkg/quote.go:154 pkg/expenses.go:438 pkg/invoices.go:154
msgid "All status"
msgstr "Todos los estados"
#: pkg/quote.go:159
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Quotation Number"
msgstr "Número de presupuesto"
#: pkg/quote.go:164 pkg/expenses.go:423 pkg/invoices.go:164
msgctxt "input"
msgid "From Date"
msgstr "A partir de la fecha"
#: pkg/quote.go:169 pkg/expenses.go:428 pkg/invoices.go:169
msgctxt "input"
msgid "To Date"
msgstr "Hasta la fecha"
#: pkg/quote.go:183
msgid "Quotations must have all the specified labels."
msgstr "Los presupuestos deben tener todas las etiquetas."
#: pkg/quote.go:188
msgid "Quotations must have at least one of the specified labels."
msgstr "Los presupuestos deben tener como mínimo una de las etiquetas."
#: pkg/quote.go:614
msgid "quotations.zip"
msgstr "presupuestos.zip"
#: pkg/quote.go:620 pkg/quote.go:1149 pkg/quote.go:1157 pkg/expenses.go:620
#: pkg/invoices.go:663 pkg/invoices.go:1279 pkg/invoices.go:1287
msgid "Invalid action"
msgstr "Acción inválida."
#: pkg/quote.go:673
msgid "Select a customer to quote."
msgstr "Escoged un cliente a presupuestar."
#: pkg/quote.go:678
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Quotation Date"
msgstr "Fecha del presupuesto"
#: pkg/quote.go:684
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Terms and conditions"
msgstr "Condiciones de aceptación"
#: pkg/quote.go:689 pkg/invoices.go:727
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Notes"
msgstr "Notas"
#: pkg/quote.go:698 pkg/invoices.go:737
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Payment Method"
msgstr "Método de pago"
#: pkg/quote.go:699
msgid "Select a payment method."
msgstr "Escoged un método e pago."
#: pkg/quote.go:735
msgid "Selected quotation status is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un estado de presupuesto que no es válido."
#: pkg/quote.go:737 pkg/invoices.go:792
msgid "Selected customer is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un cliente que no es válido."
#: pkg/quote.go:739
msgid "Quotation date can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la fecha del presupuesto en blanco."
#: pkg/quote.go:740
msgid "Quotation date must be a valid date."
msgstr "La fecha de presupuesto debe ser válida."
#: pkg/quote.go:743 pkg/invoices.go:796
msgid "Selected payment method is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un método de pago que no es válido."
#: pkg/quote.go:877 pkg/quote.go:882 pkg/invoices.go:992 pkg/invoices.go:997
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Id"
msgstr "Identificador"
#: pkg/quote.go:915 pkg/invoices.go:1030
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Quantity"
msgstr "Cantidad"
#: pkg/quote.go:924 pkg/invoices.go:1039
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Discount (%)"
msgstr "Descuento (%)"
#: pkg/quote.go:978
msgid "Quotation product ID must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "El ID de producto de presupuesto tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
#: pkg/quote.go:981 pkg/invoices.go:1096
msgid "Product ID must be a positive number or zero."
msgstr "El ID de producto tiene que ser un número positivo o cero."
#: pkg/quote.go:987 pkg/invoices.go:1102
msgid "Quantity can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la cantidad en blanco."
#: pkg/quote.go:988 pkg/invoices.go:1103
msgid "Quantity must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "La cantidad tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
#: pkg/quote.go:990 pkg/invoices.go:1105
msgid "Discount can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el descuento en blanco."
#: pkg/quote.go:991 pkg/invoices.go:1106
msgid "Discount must be a percentage between 0 and 100."
msgstr "El descuento tiene que ser un porcentaje entre 0 y 100."
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
#: pkg/profile.go:25
msgctxt "language option"
msgid "Automatic"
msgstr "Automático"
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
#: pkg/profile.go:31
msgctxt "input"
msgid "User name"
msgstr "Nombre de usuario"
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
#: pkg/profile.go:57
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Password Confirmation"
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgstr "Confirmación contraseña"
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
#: pkg/profile.go:65
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Language"
msgstr "Idioma"
#: pkg/profile.go:93
msgid "Confirmation does not match password."
msgstr "La confirmación no corresponde con la contraseña."
#: pkg/profile.go:94
msgid "Selected language is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un idioma que no es válido."
#: pkg/dashboard.go:138
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Period"
msgstr "Periodo"
#: pkg/dashboard.go:141
msgctxt "period option"
msgid "Month"
msgstr "Mes"
#: pkg/dashboard.go:145
msgctxt "period option"
msgid "Previous month"
msgstr "Mes anterior"
#: pkg/dashboard.go:149
msgctxt "period option"
msgid "Quarter"
msgstr "Trimestre"
#: pkg/dashboard.go:153
msgctxt "period option"
msgid "Previous quarter"
msgstr "Trimestre anterior"
#: pkg/dashboard.go:157
msgctxt "period option"
msgid "Year"
msgstr "Año"
#: pkg/dashboard.go:161
msgctxt "period option"
msgid "Previous year"
msgstr "Año anterior"
#: pkg/expenses.go:168
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "Select a contact."
msgstr "Escoged un contacto"
#: pkg/expenses.go:225 pkg/expenses.go:412
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Contact"
msgstr "Contacto"
#: pkg/expenses.go:231
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Invoice number"
msgstr "Número de factura"
#: pkg/expenses.go:236 pkg/invoices.go:721
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Invoice Date"
msgstr "Fecha de factura"
#: pkg/expenses.go:251
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Amount"
msgstr "Importe"
#: pkg/expenses.go:262 pkg/invoices.go:743
msgctxt "input"
msgid "File"
msgstr "Archivo"
#: pkg/expenses.go:268 pkg/expenses.go:437
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Expense Status"
msgstr "Estado del gasto"
#: pkg/expenses.go:308
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "Selected contact is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un contacto que no es válido."
#: pkg/expenses.go:309 pkg/invoices.go:794
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "Invoice date must be a valid date."
msgstr "La fecha de factura debe ser válida."
#: pkg/expenses.go:312
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "Amount can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar el importe en blanco."
#: pkg/expenses.go:313
2023-05-03 10:46:25 +00:00
msgid "Amount must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "El importe tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
#: pkg/expenses.go:315
msgid "Selected expense status is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un estado de gasto que no es válido."
#: pkg/expenses.go:413
msgid "All contacts"
msgstr "Todos los contactos"
#: pkg/expenses.go:418 pkg/invoices.go:159
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Invoice Number"
msgstr "Número de factura"
#: pkg/invoices.go:153 pkg/invoices.go:709
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Invoice Status"
msgstr "Estado de la factura"
#: pkg/invoices.go:553
msgid "Select a customer to bill."
msgstr "Escoged un cliente a facturar."
#: pkg/invoices.go:657
msgid "invoices.zip"
msgstr "facturas.zip"
#: pkg/invoices.go:791
msgid "Selected invoice status is not valid."
msgstr "Habéis escogido un estado de factura que no es válido."
#: pkg/invoices.go:793
msgid "Invoice date can not be empty."
msgstr "No podéis dejar la fecha de la factura en blanco."
#: pkg/invoices.go:929
#, c-format
msgid "Re: quotation #%s of %s"
msgstr "Ref: presupuesto n.º %s del %s"
#: pkg/invoices.go:930
msgctxt "to_char"
msgid "MM/DD/YYYY"
msgstr "DD/MM/YYYY"
#: pkg/invoices.go:1093
msgid "Invoice product ID must be a number greater than zero."
msgstr "El ID de producto de factura tiene que ser un número mayor a cero."
#: pkg/contacts.go:283
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Need to input tax details"
msgstr "Necesito facturar este contacto"
#: pkg/contacts.go:343
msgctxt "input"
msgid "IBAN"
msgstr "IBAN"
#: pkg/contacts.go:348
msgctxt "bic"
msgid "BIC"
msgstr "BIC"
#: pkg/contacts.go:404
Split contact relation into tax_details, phone, web, and email We need to have contacts with just a name: we need to assign freelancer’s quote as expense linked the government, but of course we do not have a phone or email for that “contact”, much less a VATIN or other tax details. It is also interesting for other expenses-only contacts to not have to input all tax details, as we may not need to invoice then, thus are useless for us, but sometimes it might be interesting to have them, “just in case”. Of course, i did not want to make nullable any of the tax details required to generate an invoice, otherwise we could allow illegal invoices. Therefore, that data had to go in a different relation, and invoice’s foreign key update to point to that relation, not just customer, or we would again be able to create invalid invoices. We replaced the contact’s trade name with just name, because we do not need _three_ names for a contact, but we _do_ need two: the one we use to refer to them and the business name for tax purposes. The new contact_phone, contact_web, and contact_email relations could be simply a nullable field, but i did not see the point, since there are not that many instances where i need any of this data. Now company.taxDetailsForm is no longer “the same as contactForm with some extra fields”, because i have to add a check whether the user needs to invoice the contact, to check that the required values are there. I have an additional problem with the contact form when not using JavaScript: i must set the required field to all tax details fields to avoid the “(optional)” suffix, and because they _are_ required when that checkbox is enabled, but i can not set them optional when the check is unchecked. My solution for now is to ignore the form validation, and later i will add some JavaScript that adds the validation again, so it will work in all cases.
2023-06-30 19:32:48 +00:00
msgid "Name must have at least two letters."
msgstr "El nombre debe contener como mínimo dos letras."
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
#: pkg/contacts.go:417
msgid "This values is not a valid IBAN."
msgstr "Este valor no es un IBAN válido."
#: pkg/contacts.go:420
msgid "This values is not a valid BIC."
msgstr "Este valor no es un BIC válido."
#: pkg/contacts.go:534
Allow importing contacts from Holded This allows to import an Excel file exported from Holded, because it is our own user case. When we have more customers, we will give out an Excel template file to fill out. Why XLSX files instead of CSV, for instance? First, because this is the output from Holded, but even then we would have more trouble with CSV than with XLSX because of Microsoft: they royally fucked up interoperability when decided that CSV files, the files that only other applications or programmers see, should be “localized”, and use a comma or a **semicolon** to separate a **comma** separated file depending on the locale’s decimal separator. This is ridiculous because it means that CSV files created with an Excel in USA uses comma while the same Excel but with a French locale expects the fields to be separated by semicolon. And for no good reason, either. Since they fucked up so bad, decided to add a non-standard “meta” field to specify the separator, writing a `sep=,` in the first line, but this only works for reading, because saving the same file changes the separator back to the locale-dependent character and removes the “meta” field. And since everyone expects to open spreadsheet with Excel, i can not use CSV if i do not want a bunch of support tickets telling me that the template is all in a single line. I use an extremely old version of a xlsx reading library for golang[0] because it is already available in Debian repositories, and the only thing i want from it is to convert the convoluted XML file into a string array. Go is only responsible to read the file and dump its contents into a temporary table, so that it can execute the PL/pgSQL function that will actually move that data to the correct relations, much like add_contact does but in batch. In PostgreSQL version 16 they added a pg_input_is_valid function that i would use to test whether input values really conform to domains, but i will have to wait for Debian to pick up the new version. Meanwhile, i use a couple of temporary functions, in lieu of nested functions support in PostgreSQL. Part of #45 [0]: https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
2023-07-02 22:05:47 +00:00
msgctxt "input"
msgid "Holded Excel file"
msgstr "Archivo Excel de Holded"
#~ msgctxt "expense"
#~ msgid "All"
#~ msgstr "Todos"
#~ msgctxt "action"
#~ msgid "Update contact"
#~ msgstr "Actualizar contacto"
#~ msgctxt "action"
#~ msgid "Update expense"
#~ msgstr "Actualizar gasto"
#~ msgctxt "action"
#~ msgid "Update product"
#~ msgstr "Actualizar producto"
#~ msgctxt "action"
#~ msgid "Edit invoice"
#~ msgstr "Editar factura"
#~ msgctxt "contact"
#~ msgid "All"
#~ msgstr "Todos"
#~ msgid "Product ID can not be empty."
#~ msgstr "No podéis dejar el identificador de producto en blanco."
#~ msgctxt "input"
#~ msgid "Number"
#~ msgstr "Número"
#~ msgctxt "title"
#~ msgid "Label"
#~ msgstr "Etiqueta"
#~ msgid "Select a tax for this product."
#~ msgstr "Escoged un impuesto para este producto."
2023-02-03 12:29:10 +00:00
#~ msgctxt "input"
#~ msgid "Tax"
#~ msgstr "Impuesto"
#~ msgctxt "title"
#~ msgid "Customers"
#~ msgstr "Clientes"
#~ msgid "No customers added yet."
#~ msgstr "No hay clientes."